Cargando…
Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study
BACKGROUND: Individuals with idiopathic environmental illness with attribution to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) believe they suffer negative health effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields from everyday objects such as mobile phone base stations. OBJECTIVES: This study used both open provoc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2072835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18007992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10286 |
_version_ | 1782137792418021376 |
---|---|
author | Eltiti, Stacy Wallace, Denise Ridgewell, Anna Zougkou, Konstantina Russo, Riccardo Sepulveda, Francisco Mirshekar-Syahkal, Dariush Rasor, Paul Deeble, Roger Fox, Elaine |
author_facet | Eltiti, Stacy Wallace, Denise Ridgewell, Anna Zougkou, Konstantina Russo, Riccardo Sepulveda, Francisco Mirshekar-Syahkal, Dariush Rasor, Paul Deeble, Roger Fox, Elaine |
author_sort | Eltiti, Stacy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Individuals with idiopathic environmental illness with attribution to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) believe they suffer negative health effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields from everyday objects such as mobile phone base stations. OBJECTIVES: This study used both open provocation and double-blind tests to determine if sensitive and control individuals experience more negative health effects when exposed to base station-like signals compared with sham. METHODS: Fifty-six self-reported sensitive and 120 control participants were tested in an open provocation test. Of these, 12 sensitive and 6 controls withdrew after the first session. The remainder completed a series of double-blind tests. Subjective measures of well-being and symptoms as well as physiological measures of blood volume pulse, heart rate, and skin conductance were obtained. RESULTS: During the open provocation, sensitive individuals reported lower levels of well-being in both the global system for mobile communication (GSM) and universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS) compared with sham exposure, whereas controls reported more symptoms during the UMTS exposure. During double-blind tests the GSM signal did not have any effect on either group. Sensitive participants did report elevated levels of arousal during the UMTS condition, whereas the number or severity of symptoms experienced did not increase. Physiological measures did not differ across the three exposure conditions for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term exposure to a typical GSM base station-like signal did not affect well-being or physiological functions in sensitive or control individuals. Sensitive individuals reported elevated levels of arousal when exposed to a UMTS signal. Further analysis, however, indicated that this difference was likely to be due to the effect of order of exposure rather than the exposure itself. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2072835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20728352007-11-14 Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study Eltiti, Stacy Wallace, Denise Ridgewell, Anna Zougkou, Konstantina Russo, Riccardo Sepulveda, Francisco Mirshekar-Syahkal, Dariush Rasor, Paul Deeble, Roger Fox, Elaine Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: Individuals with idiopathic environmental illness with attribution to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) believe they suffer negative health effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields from everyday objects such as mobile phone base stations. OBJECTIVES: This study used both open provocation and double-blind tests to determine if sensitive and control individuals experience more negative health effects when exposed to base station-like signals compared with sham. METHODS: Fifty-six self-reported sensitive and 120 control participants were tested in an open provocation test. Of these, 12 sensitive and 6 controls withdrew after the first session. The remainder completed a series of double-blind tests. Subjective measures of well-being and symptoms as well as physiological measures of blood volume pulse, heart rate, and skin conductance were obtained. RESULTS: During the open provocation, sensitive individuals reported lower levels of well-being in both the global system for mobile communication (GSM) and universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS) compared with sham exposure, whereas controls reported more symptoms during the UMTS exposure. During double-blind tests the GSM signal did not have any effect on either group. Sensitive participants did report elevated levels of arousal during the UMTS condition, whereas the number or severity of symptoms experienced did not increase. Physiological measures did not differ across the three exposure conditions for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term exposure to a typical GSM base station-like signal did not affect well-being or physiological functions in sensitive or control individuals. Sensitive individuals reported elevated levels of arousal when exposed to a UMTS signal. Further analysis, however, indicated that this difference was likely to be due to the effect of order of exposure rather than the exposure itself. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2007-11 2007-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2072835/ /pubmed/18007992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10286 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Research Eltiti, Stacy Wallace, Denise Ridgewell, Anna Zougkou, Konstantina Russo, Riccardo Sepulveda, Francisco Mirshekar-Syahkal, Dariush Rasor, Paul Deeble, Roger Fox, Elaine Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study |
title | Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study |
title_full | Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study |
title_fullStr | Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study |
title_short | Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study |
title_sort | does short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals increase symptoms in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields? a double-blind randomized provocation study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2072835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18007992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eltitistacy doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy AT wallacedenise doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy AT ridgewellanna doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy AT zougkoukonstantina doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy AT russoriccardo doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy AT sepulvedafrancisco doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy AT mirshekarsyahkaldariush doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy AT rasorpaul doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy AT deebleroger doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy AT foxelaine doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy |