Cargando…

Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study

BACKGROUND: Individuals with idiopathic environmental illness with attribution to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) believe they suffer negative health effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields from everyday objects such as mobile phone base stations. OBJECTIVES: This study used both open provoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eltiti, Stacy, Wallace, Denise, Ridgewell, Anna, Zougkou, Konstantina, Russo, Riccardo, Sepulveda, Francisco, Mirshekar-Syahkal, Dariush, Rasor, Paul, Deeble, Roger, Fox, Elaine
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2072835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18007992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10286
_version_ 1782137792418021376
author Eltiti, Stacy
Wallace, Denise
Ridgewell, Anna
Zougkou, Konstantina
Russo, Riccardo
Sepulveda, Francisco
Mirshekar-Syahkal, Dariush
Rasor, Paul
Deeble, Roger
Fox, Elaine
author_facet Eltiti, Stacy
Wallace, Denise
Ridgewell, Anna
Zougkou, Konstantina
Russo, Riccardo
Sepulveda, Francisco
Mirshekar-Syahkal, Dariush
Rasor, Paul
Deeble, Roger
Fox, Elaine
author_sort Eltiti, Stacy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals with idiopathic environmental illness with attribution to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) believe they suffer negative health effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields from everyday objects such as mobile phone base stations. OBJECTIVES: This study used both open provocation and double-blind tests to determine if sensitive and control individuals experience more negative health effects when exposed to base station-like signals compared with sham. METHODS: Fifty-six self-reported sensitive and 120 control participants were tested in an open provocation test. Of these, 12 sensitive and 6 controls withdrew after the first session. The remainder completed a series of double-blind tests. Subjective measures of well-being and symptoms as well as physiological measures of blood volume pulse, heart rate, and skin conductance were obtained. RESULTS: During the open provocation, sensitive individuals reported lower levels of well-being in both the global system for mobile communication (GSM) and universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS) compared with sham exposure, whereas controls reported more symptoms during the UMTS exposure. During double-blind tests the GSM signal did not have any effect on either group. Sensitive participants did report elevated levels of arousal during the UMTS condition, whereas the number or severity of symptoms experienced did not increase. Physiological measures did not differ across the three exposure conditions for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term exposure to a typical GSM base station-like signal did not affect well-being or physiological functions in sensitive or control individuals. Sensitive individuals reported elevated levels of arousal when exposed to a UMTS signal. Further analysis, however, indicated that this difference was likely to be due to the effect of order of exposure rather than the exposure itself.
format Text
id pubmed-2072835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20728352007-11-14 Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study Eltiti, Stacy Wallace, Denise Ridgewell, Anna Zougkou, Konstantina Russo, Riccardo Sepulveda, Francisco Mirshekar-Syahkal, Dariush Rasor, Paul Deeble, Roger Fox, Elaine Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: Individuals with idiopathic environmental illness with attribution to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) believe they suffer negative health effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields from everyday objects such as mobile phone base stations. OBJECTIVES: This study used both open provocation and double-blind tests to determine if sensitive and control individuals experience more negative health effects when exposed to base station-like signals compared with sham. METHODS: Fifty-six self-reported sensitive and 120 control participants were tested in an open provocation test. Of these, 12 sensitive and 6 controls withdrew after the first session. The remainder completed a series of double-blind tests. Subjective measures of well-being and symptoms as well as physiological measures of blood volume pulse, heart rate, and skin conductance were obtained. RESULTS: During the open provocation, sensitive individuals reported lower levels of well-being in both the global system for mobile communication (GSM) and universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS) compared with sham exposure, whereas controls reported more symptoms during the UMTS exposure. During double-blind tests the GSM signal did not have any effect on either group. Sensitive participants did report elevated levels of arousal during the UMTS condition, whereas the number or severity of symptoms experienced did not increase. Physiological measures did not differ across the three exposure conditions for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term exposure to a typical GSM base station-like signal did not affect well-being or physiological functions in sensitive or control individuals. Sensitive individuals reported elevated levels of arousal when exposed to a UMTS signal. Further analysis, however, indicated that this difference was likely to be due to the effect of order of exposure rather than the exposure itself. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2007-11 2007-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2072835/ /pubmed/18007992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10286 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Eltiti, Stacy
Wallace, Denise
Ridgewell, Anna
Zougkou, Konstantina
Russo, Riccardo
Sepulveda, Francisco
Mirshekar-Syahkal, Dariush
Rasor, Paul
Deeble, Roger
Fox, Elaine
Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study
title Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study
title_full Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study
title_fullStr Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study
title_full_unstemmed Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study
title_short Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study
title_sort does short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals increase symptoms in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields? a double-blind randomized provocation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2072835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18007992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10286
work_keys_str_mv AT eltitistacy doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy
AT wallacedenise doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy
AT ridgewellanna doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy
AT zougkoukonstantina doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy
AT russoriccardo doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy
AT sepulvedafrancisco doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy
AT mirshekarsyahkaldariush doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy
AT rasorpaul doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy
AT deebleroger doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy
AT foxelaine doesshorttermexposuretomobilephonebasestationsignalsincreasesymptomsinindividualswhoreportsensitivitytoelectromagneticfieldsadoubleblindrandomizedprovocationstudy