Cargando…

A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.

The current prognostic systems have failed to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients who require aggressive therapy. These staging systems do not reliably distinguish patients with different prognoses. This paper explores the possibility of improving the prognostic forecast in MM by considering som...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grignani, G., Gobbi, P. G., Formisano, R., Pieresca, C., Ucci, G., Brugnatelli, S., Riccardi, A., Ascari, E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8624271
_version_ 1782137960239464448
author Grignani, G.
Gobbi, P. G.
Formisano, R.
Pieresca, C.
Ucci, G.
Brugnatelli, S.
Riccardi, A.
Ascari, E.
author_facet Grignani, G.
Gobbi, P. G.
Formisano, R.
Pieresca, C.
Ucci, G.
Brugnatelli, S.
Riccardi, A.
Ascari, E.
author_sort Grignani, G.
collection PubMed
description The current prognostic systems have failed to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients who require aggressive therapy. These staging systems do not reliably distinguish patients with different prognoses. This paper explores the possibility of improving the prognostic forecast in MM by considering some clinical characteristics at diagnosis together with response to first-line chemotherapy. A total of 231 patients were prospectively randomised in a multicentre trial to no therapy vs melphalan + prednisone (MP) for stage I, MP in stage II, and MP vs peptichemio, vincristine and prednisone for stage III. The clinical features of these groups were evaluated for prognostic variables predictive of overall survival by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. The independently significant variables were incorporated into a model that identified three groups of patients with different risks of death and different overall survival. Three variables retained statistical significance: the staging system proposed by the British Medical Research Council, a composite parameter integrating the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells with cytological features of the infiltrating elements (plasma cell vs plasmablast), and response to 6 months of first-line chemotherapy. These three variables led the proposal of a scoring system able to identify three different risk classes (with median overall survival of 52, 28 and 13 months respectively) and to estimate individual patient prognosis more flexibly. The proposed risk classes, drawn from both diagnostic and therapeutic parameters, are thought to be a clinical and investigational instrument for separating MM patients into comparable groups, for selecting the best available therapy and for evaluating response with respect to the disease of each new patient.
format Text
id pubmed-2074407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20744072009-09-10 A prognostic index for multiple myeloma. Grignani, G. Gobbi, P. G. Formisano, R. Pieresca, C. Ucci, G. Brugnatelli, S. Riccardi, A. Ascari, E. Br J Cancer Research Article The current prognostic systems have failed to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients who require aggressive therapy. These staging systems do not reliably distinguish patients with different prognoses. This paper explores the possibility of improving the prognostic forecast in MM by considering some clinical characteristics at diagnosis together with response to first-line chemotherapy. A total of 231 patients were prospectively randomised in a multicentre trial to no therapy vs melphalan + prednisone (MP) for stage I, MP in stage II, and MP vs peptichemio, vincristine and prednisone for stage III. The clinical features of these groups were evaluated for prognostic variables predictive of overall survival by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. The independently significant variables were incorporated into a model that identified three groups of patients with different risks of death and different overall survival. Three variables retained statistical significance: the staging system proposed by the British Medical Research Council, a composite parameter integrating the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells with cytological features of the infiltrating elements (plasma cell vs plasmablast), and response to 6 months of first-line chemotherapy. These three variables led the proposal of a scoring system able to identify three different risk classes (with median overall survival of 52, 28 and 13 months respectively) and to estimate individual patient prognosis more flexibly. The proposed risk classes, drawn from both diagnostic and therapeutic parameters, are thought to be a clinical and investigational instrument for separating MM patients into comparable groups, for selecting the best available therapy and for evaluating response with respect to the disease of each new patient. Nature Publishing Group 1996-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2074407/ /pubmed/8624271 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grignani, G.
Gobbi, P. G.
Formisano, R.
Pieresca, C.
Ucci, G.
Brugnatelli, S.
Riccardi, A.
Ascari, E.
A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.
title A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.
title_full A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.
title_fullStr A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.
title_full_unstemmed A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.
title_short A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.
title_sort prognostic index for multiple myeloma.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8624271
work_keys_str_mv AT grignanig aprognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT gobbipg aprognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT formisanor aprognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT pierescac aprognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT uccig aprognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT brugnatellis aprognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT riccardia aprognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT ascarie aprognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT grignanig prognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT gobbipg prognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT formisanor prognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT pierescac prognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT uccig prognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT brugnatellis prognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT riccardia prognosticindexformultiplemyeloma
AT ascarie prognosticindexformultiplemyeloma