Cargando…

Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours.

The study was designed to investigate possible relationships between tumour response and exposure to cisplatin (area under the curve of unbound cisplatin in plasma, AUC) and DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes (WBC) in patients with solid tumours. Patients were treated with six weekly courses of cisp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schellens, J. H., Ma, J., Planting, A. S., van der Burg, M. E., van Meerten, E., de Boer-Dennert, M., Schmitz, P. I., Stoter, G., Verweij, J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8664132
_version_ 1782137992002928640
author Schellens, J. H.
Ma, J.
Planting, A. S.
van der Burg, M. E.
van Meerten, E.
de Boer-Dennert, M.
Schmitz, P. I.
Stoter, G.
Verweij, J.
author_facet Schellens, J. H.
Ma, J.
Planting, A. S.
van der Burg, M. E.
van Meerten, E.
de Boer-Dennert, M.
Schmitz, P. I.
Stoter, G.
Verweij, J.
author_sort Schellens, J. H.
collection PubMed
description The study was designed to investigate possible relationships between tumour response and exposure to cisplatin (area under the curve of unbound cisplatin in plasma, AUC) and DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes (WBC) in patients with solid tumours. Patients were treated with six weekly courses of cisplatin at a dose of 70 or 80 mg m-2. The AUC was determined during the first course and DNA-adduct levels in WBC during all courses at baseline, 1 h (A(max)) and 15 h after a 3 h infusion of cisplatin. The area under the DNA-adduct-time curve (AUA) was calculated. The tumour response was determined after six courses. Forty-five evaluable patients received 237 courses of cisplatin. Sixteen patients with head and neck cancer received a dose of 80 mg m-2 and 29 with various other tumour types received 70 mg m-2 plus daily 50 mg oral etoposide. There were 20 responders (partial and complete) and 25 non-responders (stable and progressive disease). The AUC was highly variable (mean +/- s.d. = 2.48 +/- 0.51 micrograms h-1 ml-1; range 1.10-3.82) and was closely correlated with the AUA (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001) and A(max) (r = 0.73, P < 0.0001). The AUC, AUA and A(max) were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders in the total population (P < 0.0001) and in the two subgroups treated at 70 or 80 mg m-2. In logistic regression analysis AUC, AUA and A(max) were important predictors of response. The magnitude of exposure to cisplatin is, through DNA-adduct formation, the major determinant of the response rate in this population. Hence, individualised dosing of cisplatin using AUC or DNA-adducts should lead to increased response rates.
format Text
id pubmed-2074557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20745572009-09-10 Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours. Schellens, J. H. Ma, J. Planting, A. S. van der Burg, M. E. van Meerten, E. de Boer-Dennert, M. Schmitz, P. I. Stoter, G. Verweij, J. Br J Cancer Research Article The study was designed to investigate possible relationships between tumour response and exposure to cisplatin (area under the curve of unbound cisplatin in plasma, AUC) and DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes (WBC) in patients with solid tumours. Patients were treated with six weekly courses of cisplatin at a dose of 70 or 80 mg m-2. The AUC was determined during the first course and DNA-adduct levels in WBC during all courses at baseline, 1 h (A(max)) and 15 h after a 3 h infusion of cisplatin. The area under the DNA-adduct-time curve (AUA) was calculated. The tumour response was determined after six courses. Forty-five evaluable patients received 237 courses of cisplatin. Sixteen patients with head and neck cancer received a dose of 80 mg m-2 and 29 with various other tumour types received 70 mg m-2 plus daily 50 mg oral etoposide. There were 20 responders (partial and complete) and 25 non-responders (stable and progressive disease). The AUC was highly variable (mean +/- s.d. = 2.48 +/- 0.51 micrograms h-1 ml-1; range 1.10-3.82) and was closely correlated with the AUA (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001) and A(max) (r = 0.73, P < 0.0001). The AUC, AUA and A(max) were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders in the total population (P < 0.0001) and in the two subgroups treated at 70 or 80 mg m-2. In logistic regression analysis AUC, AUA and A(max) were important predictors of response. The magnitude of exposure to cisplatin is, through DNA-adduct formation, the major determinant of the response rate in this population. Hence, individualised dosing of cisplatin using AUC or DNA-adducts should lead to increased response rates. Nature Publishing Group 1996-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2074557/ /pubmed/8664132 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schellens, J. H.
Ma, J.
Planting, A. S.
van der Burg, M. E.
van Meerten, E.
de Boer-Dennert, M.
Schmitz, P. I.
Stoter, G.
Verweij, J.
Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours.
title Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours.
title_full Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours.
title_fullStr Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours.
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours.
title_short Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours.
title_sort relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, dna-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8664132
work_keys_str_mv AT schellensjh relationshipbetweentheexposuretocisplatindnaadductformationinleucocytesandtumourresponseinpatientswithsolidtumours
AT maj relationshipbetweentheexposuretocisplatindnaadductformationinleucocytesandtumourresponseinpatientswithsolidtumours
AT plantingas relationshipbetweentheexposuretocisplatindnaadductformationinleucocytesandtumourresponseinpatientswithsolidtumours
AT vanderburgme relationshipbetweentheexposuretocisplatindnaadductformationinleucocytesandtumourresponseinpatientswithsolidtumours
AT vanmeertene relationshipbetweentheexposuretocisplatindnaadductformationinleucocytesandtumourresponseinpatientswithsolidtumours
AT deboerdennertm relationshipbetweentheexposuretocisplatindnaadductformationinleucocytesandtumourresponseinpatientswithsolidtumours
AT schmitzpi relationshipbetweentheexposuretocisplatindnaadductformationinleucocytesandtumourresponseinpatientswithsolidtumours
AT stoterg relationshipbetweentheexposuretocisplatindnaadductformationinleucocytesandtumourresponseinpatientswithsolidtumours
AT verweijj relationshipbetweentheexposuretocisplatindnaadductformationinleucocytesandtumourresponseinpatientswithsolidtumours