Cargando…
Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer.
Residual retroperitoneal masses may remain after chemotherapy for metastatic non-seminomatous testicular cancer, which harbour residual tumour or totally benign tissue (necrosis/fibrosis). These residual masses may be effectively removed by a surgical resection. We evaluated current selection criter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1996
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8912551 |
_version_ | 1782138038729572352 |
---|---|
author | Steyerberg, E. W. Keizer, H. J. Fosså, S. D. Sleijfer, D. T. Bajorin, D. F. Donohue, J. P. Habbema, J. D. |
author_facet | Steyerberg, E. W. Keizer, H. J. Fosså, S. D. Sleijfer, D. T. Bajorin, D. F. Donohue, J. P. Habbema, J. D. |
author_sort | Steyerberg, E. W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Residual retroperitoneal masses may remain after chemotherapy for metastatic non-seminomatous testicular cancer, which harbour residual tumour or totally benign tissue (necrosis/fibrosis). These residual masses may be effectively removed by a surgical resection. We evaluated current selection criteria and tried to develop alternative criteria in a data set of 544 patients, who had retroperitoneal lymph node dissection of residual masses. Six resection policies were identified from the literature. Two alternative policies were developed with logistic regression analysis. Evaluation of the policies focused on the true-positive rate (resection in case of tumour), and the false-positive rate (resection in case of necrosis). It appeared that most current policies use the size of the residual mass (> or = 10 mm or > or = 20 mm) as the predominant selection criterion. This resulted in high true-positive rates (most > 90%), but false-positive rates between 37% and 87%. The alternative policies included five well-known predictors of necrosis in addition to residual mass size (primary tumour histology, prechemotherapy levels of the three tumour markers alphafetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and mass shrinkage during chemotherapy). This strategy resulted in improved true- and false-positive rates, even when categories of the predictors were simplified for practical application. We conclude that a simple statistical model, based on a limited number of patient characteristics, provides better guidelines for patient selection than those currently used in clinical practice. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2074767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1996 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20747672009-09-10 Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer. Steyerberg, E. W. Keizer, H. J. Fosså, S. D. Sleijfer, D. T. Bajorin, D. F. Donohue, J. P. Habbema, J. D. Br J Cancer Research Article Residual retroperitoneal masses may remain after chemotherapy for metastatic non-seminomatous testicular cancer, which harbour residual tumour or totally benign tissue (necrosis/fibrosis). These residual masses may be effectively removed by a surgical resection. We evaluated current selection criteria and tried to develop alternative criteria in a data set of 544 patients, who had retroperitoneal lymph node dissection of residual masses. Six resection policies were identified from the literature. Two alternative policies were developed with logistic regression analysis. Evaluation of the policies focused on the true-positive rate (resection in case of tumour), and the false-positive rate (resection in case of necrosis). It appeared that most current policies use the size of the residual mass (> or = 10 mm or > or = 20 mm) as the predominant selection criterion. This resulted in high true-positive rates (most > 90%), but false-positive rates between 37% and 87%. The alternative policies included five well-known predictors of necrosis in addition to residual mass size (primary tumour histology, prechemotherapy levels of the three tumour markers alphafetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and mass shrinkage during chemotherapy). This strategy resulted in improved true- and false-positive rates, even when categories of the predictors were simplified for practical application. We conclude that a simple statistical model, based on a limited number of patient characteristics, provides better guidelines for patient selection than those currently used in clinical practice. Nature Publishing Group 1996-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2074767/ /pubmed/8912551 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Steyerberg, E. W. Keizer, H. J. Fosså, S. D. Sleijfer, D. T. Bajorin, D. F. Donohue, J. P. Habbema, J. D. Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer. |
title | Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer. |
title_full | Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer. |
title_fullStr | Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer. |
title_full_unstemmed | Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer. |
title_short | Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer. |
title_sort | resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. the rehit study group. re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8912551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steyerbergew resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer AT keizerhj resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer AT fossasd resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer AT sleijferdt resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer AT bajorindf resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer AT donohuejp resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer AT habbemajd resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer |