Cargando…

Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer.

Residual retroperitoneal masses may remain after chemotherapy for metastatic non-seminomatous testicular cancer, which harbour residual tumour or totally benign tissue (necrosis/fibrosis). These residual masses may be effectively removed by a surgical resection. We evaluated current selection criter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steyerberg, E. W., Keizer, H. J., Fosså, S. D., Sleijfer, D. T., Bajorin, D. F., Donohue, J. P., Habbema, J. D.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8912551
_version_ 1782138038729572352
author Steyerberg, E. W.
Keizer, H. J.
Fosså, S. D.
Sleijfer, D. T.
Bajorin, D. F.
Donohue, J. P.
Habbema, J. D.
author_facet Steyerberg, E. W.
Keizer, H. J.
Fosså, S. D.
Sleijfer, D. T.
Bajorin, D. F.
Donohue, J. P.
Habbema, J. D.
author_sort Steyerberg, E. W.
collection PubMed
description Residual retroperitoneal masses may remain after chemotherapy for metastatic non-seminomatous testicular cancer, which harbour residual tumour or totally benign tissue (necrosis/fibrosis). These residual masses may be effectively removed by a surgical resection. We evaluated current selection criteria and tried to develop alternative criteria in a data set of 544 patients, who had retroperitoneal lymph node dissection of residual masses. Six resection policies were identified from the literature. Two alternative policies were developed with logistic regression analysis. Evaluation of the policies focused on the true-positive rate (resection in case of tumour), and the false-positive rate (resection in case of necrosis). It appeared that most current policies use the size of the residual mass (> or = 10 mm or > or = 20 mm) as the predominant selection criterion. This resulted in high true-positive rates (most > 90%), but false-positive rates between 37% and 87%. The alternative policies included five well-known predictors of necrosis in addition to residual mass size (primary tumour histology, prechemotherapy levels of the three tumour markers alphafetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and mass shrinkage during chemotherapy). This strategy resulted in improved true- and false-positive rates, even when categories of the predictors were simplified for practical application. We conclude that a simple statistical model, based on a limited number of patient characteristics, provides better guidelines for patient selection than those currently used in clinical practice.
format Text
id pubmed-2074767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20747672009-09-10 Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer. Steyerberg, E. W. Keizer, H. J. Fosså, S. D. Sleijfer, D. T. Bajorin, D. F. Donohue, J. P. Habbema, J. D. Br J Cancer Research Article Residual retroperitoneal masses may remain after chemotherapy for metastatic non-seminomatous testicular cancer, which harbour residual tumour or totally benign tissue (necrosis/fibrosis). These residual masses may be effectively removed by a surgical resection. We evaluated current selection criteria and tried to develop alternative criteria in a data set of 544 patients, who had retroperitoneal lymph node dissection of residual masses. Six resection policies were identified from the literature. Two alternative policies were developed with logistic regression analysis. Evaluation of the policies focused on the true-positive rate (resection in case of tumour), and the false-positive rate (resection in case of necrosis). It appeared that most current policies use the size of the residual mass (> or = 10 mm or > or = 20 mm) as the predominant selection criterion. This resulted in high true-positive rates (most > 90%), but false-positive rates between 37% and 87%. The alternative policies included five well-known predictors of necrosis in addition to residual mass size (primary tumour histology, prechemotherapy levels of the three tumour markers alphafetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and mass shrinkage during chemotherapy). This strategy resulted in improved true- and false-positive rates, even when categories of the predictors were simplified for practical application. We conclude that a simple statistical model, based on a limited number of patient characteristics, provides better guidelines for patient selection than those currently used in clinical practice. Nature Publishing Group 1996-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2074767/ /pubmed/8912551 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Steyerberg, E. W.
Keizer, H. J.
Fosså, S. D.
Sleijfer, D. T.
Bajorin, D. F.
Donohue, J. P.
Habbema, J. D.
Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer.
title Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer.
title_full Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer.
title_fullStr Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer.
title_short Resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. The ReHiT study group. Re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer.
title_sort resection of residual retroperitoneal masses in testicular cancer: evaluation and improvement of selection criteria. the rehit study group. re-analysis of histology in testicular cancer.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8912551
work_keys_str_mv AT steyerbergew resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer
AT keizerhj resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer
AT fossasd resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer
AT sleijferdt resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer
AT bajorindf resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer
AT donohuejp resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer
AT habbemajd resectionofresidualretroperitonealmassesintesticularcancerevaluationandimprovementofselectioncriteriatherehitstudygroupreanalysisofhistologyintesticularcancer