Cargando…

Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.

Immunohistochemical staining for oestrogen receptor (ER) has been carried out using antibody ER ID5 on 170 women who received first-line tamoxifen treatment for evaluable metastatic breast cancer. ER status had been determined some years previously, using a ligand-binding cytosol assay. The adequacy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnes, D. M., Harris, W. H., Smith, P., Millis, R. R., Rubens, R. D.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8912543
_version_ 1782138039894540288
author Barnes, D. M.
Harris, W. H.
Smith, P.
Millis, R. R.
Rubens, R. D.
author_facet Barnes, D. M.
Harris, W. H.
Smith, P.
Millis, R. R.
Rubens, R. D.
author_sort Barnes, D. M.
collection PubMed
description Immunohistochemical staining for oestrogen receptor (ER) has been carried out using antibody ER ID5 on 170 women who received first-line tamoxifen treatment for evaluable metastatic breast cancer. ER status had been determined some years previously, using a ligand-binding cytosol assay. The adequacy of the tissue used for the cytosol assay was always checked by histology on an adjacent block and was deemed to be typical of the tumour overall as was the block used for immunohistochemistry. Six different methods were used to assess the degree of staining and comparisons were made to determine which method gave the most clinically relevant results. Clinical outcome was assessed both in terms of duration of response to tamoxifen determined by log-rank analysis and type of response using the chi-squared test. The ER immunohistochemical assay gave superior results compared with the cytosol assay, with all of the subjective methods of assessment of staining giving statistically significant correlations with clinical outcome. The additional contribution of progesterone receptor (PR) staining with antibody NCL PGR was also studied. IMAGES:
format Text
id pubmed-2074773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20747732009-09-10 Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. Barnes, D. M. Harris, W. H. Smith, P. Millis, R. R. Rubens, R. D. Br J Cancer Research Article Immunohistochemical staining for oestrogen receptor (ER) has been carried out using antibody ER ID5 on 170 women who received first-line tamoxifen treatment for evaluable metastatic breast cancer. ER status had been determined some years previously, using a ligand-binding cytosol assay. The adequacy of the tissue used for the cytosol assay was always checked by histology on an adjacent block and was deemed to be typical of the tumour overall as was the block used for immunohistochemistry. Six different methods were used to assess the degree of staining and comparisons were made to determine which method gave the most clinically relevant results. Clinical outcome was assessed both in terms of duration of response to tamoxifen determined by log-rank analysis and type of response using the chi-squared test. The ER immunohistochemical assay gave superior results compared with the cytosol assay, with all of the subjective methods of assessment of staining giving statistically significant correlations with clinical outcome. The additional contribution of progesterone receptor (PR) staining with antibody NCL PGR was also studied. IMAGES: Nature Publishing Group 1996-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2074773/ /pubmed/8912543 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barnes, D. M.
Harris, W. H.
Smith, P.
Millis, R. R.
Rubens, R. D.
Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.
title Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.
title_full Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.
title_fullStr Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.
title_full_unstemmed Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.
title_short Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.
title_sort immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8912543
work_keys_str_mv AT barnesdm immunohistochemicaldeterminationofoestrogenreceptorcomparisonofdifferentmethodsofassessmentofstainingandcorrelationwithclinicaloutcomeofbreastcancerpatients
AT harriswh immunohistochemicaldeterminationofoestrogenreceptorcomparisonofdifferentmethodsofassessmentofstainingandcorrelationwithclinicaloutcomeofbreastcancerpatients
AT smithp immunohistochemicaldeterminationofoestrogenreceptorcomparisonofdifferentmethodsofassessmentofstainingandcorrelationwithclinicaloutcomeofbreastcancerpatients
AT millisrr immunohistochemicaldeterminationofoestrogenreceptorcomparisonofdifferentmethodsofassessmentofstainingandcorrelationwithclinicaloutcomeofbreastcancerpatients
AT rubensrd immunohistochemicaldeterminationofoestrogenreceptorcomparisonofdifferentmethodsofassessmentofstainingandcorrelationwithclinicaloutcomeofbreastcancerpatients