Cargando…

A comparison of axillary node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds.

Screen-detected breast cancers are smaller than those detected in symptomatic populations and, for any given size, they are associated with fewer lymph node metastases. The management of axillary lymph nodes in patients with screen-detected breast cancer remains controversial. We have previously rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holland, P. A., Walls, J., Boggis, C. R., Knox, F., Baildam, A. D., Bundred, N. J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8932348
_version_ 1782138059403296768
author Holland, P. A.
Walls, J.
Boggis, C. R.
Knox, F.
Baildam, A. D.
Bundred, N. J.
author_facet Holland, P. A.
Walls, J.
Boggis, C. R.
Knox, F.
Baildam, A. D.
Bundred, N. J.
author_sort Holland, P. A.
collection PubMed
description Screen-detected breast cancers are smaller than those detected in symptomatic populations and, for any given size, they are associated with fewer lymph node metastases. The management of axillary lymph nodes in patients with screen-detected breast cancer remains controversial. We have previously reported that prevalence (initial screen)-detected cancers are associated with nodal metastases in 17.4% of cases overall. Cancers < or = 10 mm, of any grade, are associated with metastases in only 5% of cases, and grade I cancers <30 mm are not associated with metastases. This led to our recommendation that axillary surgery is unnecessary for these groups of women. The present study compared the nodal status of cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence (second) screens in order to determine whether our recommendation is appropriate for cancers detected at the first incidence screen. Overall, 30.1% of cancers detected in the first incidence screen presented axillary nodal metastases. At all size ranges, cancers detected at the first incidence screen were associated with significantly more lymph node metastases than prevalence-detected cancers. In particular, cancers < or = 10 mm were associated with metastases in 14.3% of cases. With the possible exception of grade I cancers, we believe that surgical staging of the axilla is essential for cancers detected at the first incidence screen, irrespective of size.
format Text
id pubmed-2074862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20748622009-09-10 A comparison of axillary node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds. Holland, P. A. Walls, J. Boggis, C. R. Knox, F. Baildam, A. D. Bundred, N. J. Br J Cancer Research Article Screen-detected breast cancers are smaller than those detected in symptomatic populations and, for any given size, they are associated with fewer lymph node metastases. The management of axillary lymph nodes in patients with screen-detected breast cancer remains controversial. We have previously reported that prevalence (initial screen)-detected cancers are associated with nodal metastases in 17.4% of cases overall. Cancers < or = 10 mm, of any grade, are associated with metastases in only 5% of cases, and grade I cancers <30 mm are not associated with metastases. This led to our recommendation that axillary surgery is unnecessary for these groups of women. The present study compared the nodal status of cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence (second) screens in order to determine whether our recommendation is appropriate for cancers detected at the first incidence screen. Overall, 30.1% of cancers detected in the first incidence screen presented axillary nodal metastases. At all size ranges, cancers detected at the first incidence screen were associated with significantly more lymph node metastases than prevalence-detected cancers. In particular, cancers < or = 10 mm were associated with metastases in 14.3% of cases. With the possible exception of grade I cancers, we believe that surgical staging of the axilla is essential for cancers detected at the first incidence screen, irrespective of size. Nature Publishing Group 1996-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2074862/ /pubmed/8932348 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Holland, P. A.
Walls, J.
Boggis, C. R.
Knox, F.
Baildam, A. D.
Bundred, N. J.
A comparison of axillary node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds.
title A comparison of axillary node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds.
title_full A comparison of axillary node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds.
title_fullStr A comparison of axillary node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of axillary node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds.
title_short A comparison of axillary node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds.
title_sort comparison of axillary node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2074862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8932348
work_keys_str_mv AT hollandpa acomparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT wallsj acomparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT boggiscr acomparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT knoxf acomparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT baildamad acomparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT bundrednj acomparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT hollandpa comparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT wallsj comparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT boggiscr comparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT knoxf comparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT baildamad comparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds
AT bundrednj comparisonofaxillarynodestatusbetweencancersdetectedattheprevalenceandfirstincidencebreastscreeningrounds