Cargando…

Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

A phase I study was designed to assess whether dose intensity of an 'accelerated' cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide (CDE) regimen plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could be increased further, in an outpatient setting, by escalating the dose of each single drug of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ardizzoni, A., Pennucci, M. C., Danova, M., Viscoli, C., Mariani, G. L., Giorgi, G., Venturini, M., Mereu, C., Scolaro, T., Rosso, R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2077108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8855989
_version_ 1782138098573901824
author Ardizzoni, A.
Pennucci, M. C.
Danova, M.
Viscoli, C.
Mariani, G. L.
Giorgi, G.
Venturini, M.
Mereu, C.
Scolaro, T.
Rosso, R.
author_facet Ardizzoni, A.
Pennucci, M. C.
Danova, M.
Viscoli, C.
Mariani, G. L.
Giorgi, G.
Venturini, M.
Mereu, C.
Scolaro, T.
Rosso, R.
author_sort Ardizzoni, A.
collection PubMed
description A phase I study was designed to assess whether dose intensity of an 'accelerated' cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide (CDE) regimen plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could be increased further, in an outpatient setting, by escalating the dose of each single drug of the regimen. Patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) received escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (C) 1100-1300 mg m-2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, doxorubicin (D) 50-60 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1, etoposide (E) 110-130 mg m-2 i.v. on days 1, 2, 3 and every 14 days for at least three courses. Along with chemotherapy, G-CSF (filgastrim) 5 micrograms kg-1 from day 5 to day 11 was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to all patients. Twenty-five patients were enrolled into the study. All patients at the first dose level (C 1100, D 50, E 110 x 3) completed three or more cycles at the dose and schedule planned by the protocol and no 'dose-limiting toxicity' (DLT) was seen. At the second dose level (C 1200, D 55, E 120 x 3) three out of five patients had a DLT consisting of 'granulocytopenic fever' (GCPF). Another six patients were treated at this dose level with the addition of ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice a day and only two patients had a DLT [one episode of documented oral candidiasis and one of 'fever of unknown origin' (FUO) with generalised mucositis]. Accrual of patients proceeded to the third dose level (C 1300, D 60, E 130 x 3) with the prophylactic use of ciprofloxacin. Four out of six patients experienced a DLT consisting of GCPF or documented non-bacterial infection. Accrual of patients at the third dose level was then resumed adding to ciprofloxacin anti-fungal prophylaxis (fluconazole 100 mg daily) and anti-viral prophylaxis (acyclovir 800 mg twice a day) from day 5 to 11. Out of five patients treated three experienced a DLT consisting of severe leucopenia and fever or infection. With a simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration it is indeed possible to take maximum advantage of G-CSF activity and to increase CDE dose intensity by a factor 1.65-1.80 for a maximum of 3-4 courses. The role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in this setting deserves to be investigated further.
format Text
id pubmed-2077108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20771082009-09-10 Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer. Ardizzoni, A. Pennucci, M. C. Danova, M. Viscoli, C. Mariani, G. L. Giorgi, G. Venturini, M. Mereu, C. Scolaro, T. Rosso, R. Br J Cancer Research Article A phase I study was designed to assess whether dose intensity of an 'accelerated' cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide (CDE) regimen plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could be increased further, in an outpatient setting, by escalating the dose of each single drug of the regimen. Patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) received escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (C) 1100-1300 mg m-2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, doxorubicin (D) 50-60 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1, etoposide (E) 110-130 mg m-2 i.v. on days 1, 2, 3 and every 14 days for at least three courses. Along with chemotherapy, G-CSF (filgastrim) 5 micrograms kg-1 from day 5 to day 11 was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to all patients. Twenty-five patients were enrolled into the study. All patients at the first dose level (C 1100, D 50, E 110 x 3) completed three or more cycles at the dose and schedule planned by the protocol and no 'dose-limiting toxicity' (DLT) was seen. At the second dose level (C 1200, D 55, E 120 x 3) three out of five patients had a DLT consisting of 'granulocytopenic fever' (GCPF). Another six patients were treated at this dose level with the addition of ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice a day and only two patients had a DLT [one episode of documented oral candidiasis and one of 'fever of unknown origin' (FUO) with generalised mucositis]. Accrual of patients proceeded to the third dose level (C 1300, D 60, E 130 x 3) with the prophylactic use of ciprofloxacin. Four out of six patients experienced a DLT consisting of GCPF or documented non-bacterial infection. Accrual of patients at the third dose level was then resumed adding to ciprofloxacin anti-fungal prophylaxis (fluconazole 100 mg daily) and anti-viral prophylaxis (acyclovir 800 mg twice a day) from day 5 to 11. Out of five patients treated three experienced a DLT consisting of severe leucopenia and fever or infection. With a simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration it is indeed possible to take maximum advantage of G-CSF activity and to increase CDE dose intensity by a factor 1.65-1.80 for a maximum of 3-4 courses. The role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in this setting deserves to be investigated further. Nature Publishing Group 1996-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2077108/ /pubmed/8855989 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ardizzoni, A.
Pennucci, M. C.
Danova, M.
Viscoli, C.
Mariani, G. L.
Giorgi, G.
Venturini, M.
Mereu, C.
Scolaro, T.
Rosso, R.
Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer.
title Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer.
title_full Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer.
title_fullStr Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer.
title_short Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer.
title_sort phase i study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2077108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8855989
work_keys_str_mv AT ardizzonia phaseistudyofsimultaneousdoseescalationandscheduleaccelerationofcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinetoposideusinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorwithorwithoutantimicrobialprophylaxisinpatientswithsmallcelllungcancer
AT pennuccimc phaseistudyofsimultaneousdoseescalationandscheduleaccelerationofcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinetoposideusinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorwithorwithoutantimicrobialprophylaxisinpatientswithsmallcelllungcancer
AT danovam phaseistudyofsimultaneousdoseescalationandscheduleaccelerationofcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinetoposideusinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorwithorwithoutantimicrobialprophylaxisinpatientswithsmallcelllungcancer
AT viscolic phaseistudyofsimultaneousdoseescalationandscheduleaccelerationofcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinetoposideusinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorwithorwithoutantimicrobialprophylaxisinpatientswithsmallcelllungcancer
AT marianigl phaseistudyofsimultaneousdoseescalationandscheduleaccelerationofcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinetoposideusinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorwithorwithoutantimicrobialprophylaxisinpatientswithsmallcelllungcancer
AT giorgig phaseistudyofsimultaneousdoseescalationandscheduleaccelerationofcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinetoposideusinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorwithorwithoutantimicrobialprophylaxisinpatientswithsmallcelllungcancer
AT venturinim phaseistudyofsimultaneousdoseescalationandscheduleaccelerationofcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinetoposideusinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorwithorwithoutantimicrobialprophylaxisinpatientswithsmallcelllungcancer
AT mereuc phaseistudyofsimultaneousdoseescalationandscheduleaccelerationofcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinetoposideusinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorwithorwithoutantimicrobialprophylaxisinpatientswithsmallcelllungcancer
AT scolarot phaseistudyofsimultaneousdoseescalationandscheduleaccelerationofcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinetoposideusinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorwithorwithoutantimicrobialprophylaxisinpatientswithsmallcelllungcancer
AT rossor phaseistudyofsimultaneousdoseescalationandscheduleaccelerationofcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinetoposideusinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorwithorwithoutantimicrobialprophylaxisinpatientswithsmallcelllungcancer