Cargando…

The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a socially devastating problem. The treatment algorithm depends on the aetiology of the problem. Large anal sphincter defects can be treated by sphincter replacement procedures: the dynamic graciloplasty and the artificial bowel sphincter (ABS). MATER...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melenhorst, Jarno, Koch, Sacha M., van Gemert, Wim G., Baeten, Cor G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2077921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17929038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0357-0
_version_ 1782138127210512384
author Melenhorst, Jarno
Koch, Sacha M.
van Gemert, Wim G.
Baeten, Cor G.
author_facet Melenhorst, Jarno
Koch, Sacha M.
van Gemert, Wim G.
Baeten, Cor G.
author_sort Melenhorst, Jarno
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a socially devastating problem. The treatment algorithm depends on the aetiology of the problem. Large anal sphincter defects can be treated by sphincter replacement procedures: the dynamic graciloplasty and the artificial bowel sphincter (ABS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were included between 1997 and 2006. A full preoperative workup was mandatory for all patients. During the follow-up, the Williams incontinence score was used to classify the symptoms, and anal manometry was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (25 women) were included, of which, 33 patients received an ABS. The mean follow-up was 17.4 (0.8–106.3) months. The Williams score improved significantly after placement of the ABS (p < 0.0001). The postoperative anal resting pressure with an empty cuff was not altered (p = 0.89). The postoperative ABS pressure was significantly higher then the baseline squeeze pressure (p = 0.003). Seven patients had an infection necessitating explantation. One patient was successfully reimplanted. CONCLUSION: The artificial bowel sphincter is an effective treatment for FI in patients with a large anal sphincter defect. Infectious complications are the largest threat necessitating explantation of the device.
format Text
id pubmed-2077921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20779212007-11-15 The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study Melenhorst, Jarno Koch, Sacha M. van Gemert, Wim G. Baeten, Cor G. Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a socially devastating problem. The treatment algorithm depends on the aetiology of the problem. Large anal sphincter defects can be treated by sphincter replacement procedures: the dynamic graciloplasty and the artificial bowel sphincter (ABS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were included between 1997 and 2006. A full preoperative workup was mandatory for all patients. During the follow-up, the Williams incontinence score was used to classify the symptoms, and anal manometry was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (25 women) were included, of which, 33 patients received an ABS. The mean follow-up was 17.4 (0.8–106.3) months. The Williams score improved significantly after placement of the ABS (p < 0.0001). The postoperative anal resting pressure with an empty cuff was not altered (p = 0.89). The postoperative ABS pressure was significantly higher then the baseline squeeze pressure (p = 0.003). Seven patients had an infection necessitating explantation. One patient was successfully reimplanted. CONCLUSION: The artificial bowel sphincter is an effective treatment for FI in patients with a large anal sphincter defect. Infectious complications are the largest threat necessitating explantation of the device. Springer-Verlag 2007-10-10 2008-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2077921/ /pubmed/17929038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0357-0 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Melenhorst, Jarno
Koch, Sacha M.
van Gemert, Wim G.
Baeten, Cor G.
The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study
title The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study
title_full The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study
title_fullStr The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study
title_full_unstemmed The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study
title_short The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study
title_sort artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2077921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17929038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0357-0
work_keys_str_mv AT melenhorstjarno theartificialbowelsphincterforfaecalincontinenceasinglecentrestudy
AT kochsacham theartificialbowelsphincterforfaecalincontinenceasinglecentrestudy
AT vangemertwimg theartificialbowelsphincterforfaecalincontinenceasinglecentrestudy
AT baetencorg theartificialbowelsphincterforfaecalincontinenceasinglecentrestudy
AT melenhorstjarno artificialbowelsphincterforfaecalincontinenceasinglecentrestudy
AT kochsacham artificialbowelsphincterforfaecalincontinenceasinglecentrestudy
AT vangemertwimg artificialbowelsphincterforfaecalincontinenceasinglecentrestudy
AT baetencorg artificialbowelsphincterforfaecalincontinenceasinglecentrestudy