Cargando…

Patient Satisfaction with Different Interpreting Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Growth of the foreign-born population in the U.S. has led to increasing numbers of limited-English-proficient (LEP) patients. Innovative medical interpreting strategies, including remote simultaneous medical interpreting (RSMI), have arisen to address the language barrier. This study eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gany, Francesca, Leng, Jennifer, Shapiro, Ephraim, Abramson, David, Motola, Ivette, Shield, David C., Changrani, Jyotsna
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2078551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17957417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0360-8
_version_ 1782138133836464128
author Gany, Francesca
Leng, Jennifer
Shapiro, Ephraim
Abramson, David
Motola, Ivette
Shield, David C.
Changrani, Jyotsna
author_facet Gany, Francesca
Leng, Jennifer
Shapiro, Ephraim
Abramson, David
Motola, Ivette
Shield, David C.
Changrani, Jyotsna
author_sort Gany, Francesca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Growth of the foreign-born population in the U.S. has led to increasing numbers of limited-English-proficient (LEP) patients. Innovative medical interpreting strategies, including remote simultaneous medical interpreting (RSMI), have arisen to address the language barrier. This study evaluates the impact of interpreting method on patient satisfaction. METHODS: 1,276 English-, Spanish-, Mandarin-, and Cantonese-speaking patients attending the primary care clinic and emergency department of a large New York City municipal hospital were screened for enrollment in a randomized controlled trial. Language-discordant patients were randomized to RSMI or usual and customary (U&C) interpreting. Patients with language-concordant providers received usual care. Demographic and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered to all participants. RESULTS: 541 patients were language-concordant with their providers and not randomized; 371 were randomized to RSMI, 167 of whom were exposed to RSMI; and 364 were randomized to U&C, 198 of whom were exposed to U&C. Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely than those with U&C to think doctors treated them with respect (RSMI 71%, U&C 64%, p < 0.05), but they did not differ in other measures of physician communication/care. In a linear regression analysis, exposure to RSMI was significantly associated with an increase in overall satisfaction with physician communication/care (β 0.10, 95% CI 0.02–0.18, scale 0–1.0). Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely to think the interpreting method protected their privacy (RSMI 51%, U&C 38%, p < 0.05). Patients randomized to either arm of interpretation reported less comprehension and satisfaction than patients in language-concordant encounters. CONCLUSIONS: While not a substitute for language-concordant providers, RSMI can improve patient satisfaction and privacy among LEP patients. Implementing RSMI should be considered an important component of a multipronged approach to addressing language barriers in health care.
format Text
id pubmed-2078551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20785512008-05-06 Patient Satisfaction with Different Interpreting Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial Gany, Francesca Leng, Jennifer Shapiro, Ephraim Abramson, David Motola, Ivette Shield, David C. Changrani, Jyotsna J Gen Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Growth of the foreign-born population in the U.S. has led to increasing numbers of limited-English-proficient (LEP) patients. Innovative medical interpreting strategies, including remote simultaneous medical interpreting (RSMI), have arisen to address the language barrier. This study evaluates the impact of interpreting method on patient satisfaction. METHODS: 1,276 English-, Spanish-, Mandarin-, and Cantonese-speaking patients attending the primary care clinic and emergency department of a large New York City municipal hospital were screened for enrollment in a randomized controlled trial. Language-discordant patients were randomized to RSMI or usual and customary (U&C) interpreting. Patients with language-concordant providers received usual care. Demographic and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered to all participants. RESULTS: 541 patients were language-concordant with their providers and not randomized; 371 were randomized to RSMI, 167 of whom were exposed to RSMI; and 364 were randomized to U&C, 198 of whom were exposed to U&C. Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely than those with U&C to think doctors treated them with respect (RSMI 71%, U&C 64%, p < 0.05), but they did not differ in other measures of physician communication/care. In a linear regression analysis, exposure to RSMI was significantly associated with an increase in overall satisfaction with physician communication/care (β 0.10, 95% CI 0.02–0.18, scale 0–1.0). Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely to think the interpreting method protected their privacy (RSMI 51%, U&C 38%, p < 0.05). Patients randomized to either arm of interpretation reported less comprehension and satisfaction than patients in language-concordant encounters. CONCLUSIONS: While not a substitute for language-concordant providers, RSMI can improve patient satisfaction and privacy among LEP patients. Implementing RSMI should be considered an important component of a multipronged approach to addressing language barriers in health care. Springer-Verlag 2007-10-24 2007-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2078551/ /pubmed/17957417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0360-8 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Gany, Francesca
Leng, Jennifer
Shapiro, Ephraim
Abramson, David
Motola, Ivette
Shield, David C.
Changrani, Jyotsna
Patient Satisfaction with Different Interpreting Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Patient Satisfaction with Different Interpreting Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Patient Satisfaction with Different Interpreting Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Patient Satisfaction with Different Interpreting Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Patient Satisfaction with Different Interpreting Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Patient Satisfaction with Different Interpreting Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort patient satisfaction with different interpreting methods: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2078551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17957417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0360-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ganyfrancesca patientsatisfactionwithdifferentinterpretingmethodsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lengjennifer patientsatisfactionwithdifferentinterpretingmethodsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shapiroephraim patientsatisfactionwithdifferentinterpretingmethodsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abramsondavid patientsatisfactionwithdifferentinterpretingmethodsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT motolaivette patientsatisfactionwithdifferentinterpretingmethodsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shielddavidc patientsatisfactionwithdifferentinterpretingmethodsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT changranijyotsna patientsatisfactionwithdifferentinterpretingmethodsarandomizedcontrolledtrial