Cargando…

Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms

BACKGROUND: Virtually all horses are infected with helminth parasites. For some decades, the control of parasites of Swedish horses has been based on routine treatments with anthelmintics, often several times per year. Since anthelmintic resistance is becoming an increasing problem it is essential t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lind, Eva Osterman, Rautalinko, Erik, Uggla, Arvid, Waller, Peter J, Morrison, David A, Höglund, Johan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2093939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17897438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-49-25
_version_ 1782138205845323776
author Lind, Eva Osterman
Rautalinko, Erik
Uggla, Arvid
Waller, Peter J
Morrison, David A
Höglund, Johan
author_facet Lind, Eva Osterman
Rautalinko, Erik
Uggla, Arvid
Waller, Peter J
Morrison, David A
Höglund, Johan
author_sort Lind, Eva Osterman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Virtually all horses are infected with helminth parasites. For some decades, the control of parasites of Swedish horses has been based on routine treatments with anthelmintics, often several times per year. Since anthelmintic resistance is becoming an increasing problem it is essential to develop more sustainable control strategies, which are adapted to different types of horse management. The aim of this study was to obtain information on practices used by Swedish horse owners for the control of endoparasites. METHODS: A questionnaire with 26 questions about management practices and parasite control routines was posted to 627 randomly selected horse establishments covering most types of horse management in Sweden. RESULTS: The response rate was good in all categories of respondents (66–78%). A total of 444 questionnaires were used in the analyses. It was found that virtually all horses had access to grazing areas, usually permanent. Generally, pasture hygiene was infrequently practiced. Thirty-six percent of the respondents clipped or chain harrowed their pastures, whereas weekly removal of faeces from the grazing areas was performed by 6% of the respondents, and mixed or rotational grazing with other livestock by 10%. The number of anthelmintic treatments per year varied from 1–8 with an average of 3.2. Thirty-eight percent considered late autumn (Oct-Dec) to be the most important time for deworming. This finding, and an increased use of macrocyclic lactones in the autumn, suggests a concern about bot flies, Gasterophilus intestinalis. Only 1% of the respondents stated that faecal egg counts (FEC) were performed on a regular basis. The relatively high cost of FEC analyses compared to purchase of anthelmintics was thought to contribute to the preference of deworming without a previous FEC. From the study it was evident that all categories of horse owners took advice mainly from veterinarians. CONCLUSION: The results show that routines for endoparasite control can be improved in many horse establishments. To increase the knowledge of equine endoparasite control and follow the recommendations for how to reduce the spread of anthelmintic resistance, a closer collaboration between parasitologists and veterinary practitioners is desirable.
format Text
id pubmed-2093939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20939392007-11-24 Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms Lind, Eva Osterman Rautalinko, Erik Uggla, Arvid Waller, Peter J Morrison, David A Höglund, Johan Acta Vet Scand Research BACKGROUND: Virtually all horses are infected with helminth parasites. For some decades, the control of parasites of Swedish horses has been based on routine treatments with anthelmintics, often several times per year. Since anthelmintic resistance is becoming an increasing problem it is essential to develop more sustainable control strategies, which are adapted to different types of horse management. The aim of this study was to obtain information on practices used by Swedish horse owners for the control of endoparasites. METHODS: A questionnaire with 26 questions about management practices and parasite control routines was posted to 627 randomly selected horse establishments covering most types of horse management in Sweden. RESULTS: The response rate was good in all categories of respondents (66–78%). A total of 444 questionnaires were used in the analyses. It was found that virtually all horses had access to grazing areas, usually permanent. Generally, pasture hygiene was infrequently practiced. Thirty-six percent of the respondents clipped or chain harrowed their pastures, whereas weekly removal of faeces from the grazing areas was performed by 6% of the respondents, and mixed or rotational grazing with other livestock by 10%. The number of anthelmintic treatments per year varied from 1–8 with an average of 3.2. Thirty-eight percent considered late autumn (Oct-Dec) to be the most important time for deworming. This finding, and an increased use of macrocyclic lactones in the autumn, suggests a concern about bot flies, Gasterophilus intestinalis. Only 1% of the respondents stated that faecal egg counts (FEC) were performed on a regular basis. The relatively high cost of FEC analyses compared to purchase of anthelmintics was thought to contribute to the preference of deworming without a previous FEC. From the study it was evident that all categories of horse owners took advice mainly from veterinarians. CONCLUSION: The results show that routines for endoparasite control can be improved in many horse establishments. To increase the knowledge of equine endoparasite control and follow the recommendations for how to reduce the spread of anthelmintic resistance, a closer collaboration between parasitologists and veterinary practitioners is desirable. BioMed Central 2007-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2093939/ /pubmed/17897438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-49-25 Text en Copyright © 2007 Lind et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lind, Eva Osterman
Rautalinko, Erik
Uggla, Arvid
Waller, Peter J
Morrison, David A
Höglund, Johan
Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms
title Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms
title_full Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms
title_fullStr Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms
title_full_unstemmed Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms
title_short Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms
title_sort parasite control practices on swedish horse farms
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2093939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17897438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-49-25
work_keys_str_mv AT lindevaosterman parasitecontrolpracticesonswedishhorsefarms
AT rautalinkoerik parasitecontrolpracticesonswedishhorsefarms
AT ugglaarvid parasitecontrolpracticesonswedishhorsefarms
AT wallerpeterj parasitecontrolpracticesonswedishhorsefarms
AT morrisondavida parasitecontrolpracticesonswedishhorsefarms
AT hoglundjohan parasitecontrolpracticesonswedishhorsefarms