Cargando…

Ultrasound-mediated DNA transfer for bacteria

In environmental microbiology, the most commonly used methods of bacterial DNA transfer are conjugation and electroporation. However, conjugation requires physical contact and cell–pilus–cell interactions; electroporation requires low-ionic strength medium and high voltage. These limitations have ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Yizhi, Hahn, Thomas, Thompson, Ian P., Mason, Timothy J., Preston, Gail M., Li, Guanghe, Paniwnyk, Larysa, Huang, Wei E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2095817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17890732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm710
_version_ 1782138230213181440
author Song, Yizhi
Hahn, Thomas
Thompson, Ian P.
Mason, Timothy J.
Preston, Gail M.
Li, Guanghe
Paniwnyk, Larysa
Huang, Wei E.
author_facet Song, Yizhi
Hahn, Thomas
Thompson, Ian P.
Mason, Timothy J.
Preston, Gail M.
Li, Guanghe
Paniwnyk, Larysa
Huang, Wei E.
author_sort Song, Yizhi
collection PubMed
description In environmental microbiology, the most commonly used methods of bacterial DNA transfer are conjugation and electroporation. However, conjugation requires physical contact and cell–pilus–cell interactions; electroporation requires low-ionic strength medium and high voltage. These limitations have hampered broad applications of bacterial DNA delivery. We have employed a standard low frequency 40 kHz ultrasound bath to successfully transfer plasmid pBBR1MCS2 into Pseudomonas putida UWC1, Escherichia coli DH5α and Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 with high efficiency. Under optimal conditions: ultrasound exposure time of 10 s, 50 mM CaCl(2), temperature of 22°C, plasmid concentration of 0.8 ng/µl, P. putida UWC1 cell concentration of 2.5 × 10(9) CFU (colony forming unit)/ml and reaction volume of 500 µl, the efficiency of ultrasound DNA delivery (UDD) was 9.8 ± 2.3 × 10(−6) transformants per cell, which was nine times more efficient than conjugation, and even four times greater than electroporation. We have also transferred pBBR1MCS2 into E. coli DH5α and P. fluorescens SBW25 with efficiencies of 1.16 ± 0.13 × 10(−6) and 4.33 ± 0.78 × 10(−6) transformants per cell, respectively. Low frequency UDD can be readily scaled up, allowing for the application of UDD not only in laboratory conditions but also on an industrial scale.
format Text
id pubmed-2095817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20958172007-12-07 Ultrasound-mediated DNA transfer for bacteria Song, Yizhi Hahn, Thomas Thompson, Ian P. Mason, Timothy J. Preston, Gail M. Li, Guanghe Paniwnyk, Larysa Huang, Wei E. Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online In environmental microbiology, the most commonly used methods of bacterial DNA transfer are conjugation and electroporation. However, conjugation requires physical contact and cell–pilus–cell interactions; electroporation requires low-ionic strength medium and high voltage. These limitations have hampered broad applications of bacterial DNA delivery. We have employed a standard low frequency 40 kHz ultrasound bath to successfully transfer plasmid pBBR1MCS2 into Pseudomonas putida UWC1, Escherichia coli DH5α and Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 with high efficiency. Under optimal conditions: ultrasound exposure time of 10 s, 50 mM CaCl(2), temperature of 22°C, plasmid concentration of 0.8 ng/µl, P. putida UWC1 cell concentration of 2.5 × 10(9) CFU (colony forming unit)/ml and reaction volume of 500 µl, the efficiency of ultrasound DNA delivery (UDD) was 9.8 ± 2.3 × 10(−6) transformants per cell, which was nine times more efficient than conjugation, and even four times greater than electroporation. We have also transferred pBBR1MCS2 into E. coli DH5α and P. fluorescens SBW25 with efficiencies of 1.16 ± 0.13 × 10(−6) and 4.33 ± 0.78 × 10(−6) transformants per cell, respectively. Low frequency UDD can be readily scaled up, allowing for the application of UDD not only in laboratory conditions but also on an industrial scale. Oxford University Press 2007-10 2007-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2095817/ /pubmed/17890732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm710 Text en © 2007 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods Online
Song, Yizhi
Hahn, Thomas
Thompson, Ian P.
Mason, Timothy J.
Preston, Gail M.
Li, Guanghe
Paniwnyk, Larysa
Huang, Wei E.
Ultrasound-mediated DNA transfer for bacteria
title Ultrasound-mediated DNA transfer for bacteria
title_full Ultrasound-mediated DNA transfer for bacteria
title_fullStr Ultrasound-mediated DNA transfer for bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-mediated DNA transfer for bacteria
title_short Ultrasound-mediated DNA transfer for bacteria
title_sort ultrasound-mediated dna transfer for bacteria
topic Methods Online
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2095817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17890732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm710
work_keys_str_mv AT songyizhi ultrasoundmediateddnatransferforbacteria
AT hahnthomas ultrasoundmediateddnatransferforbacteria
AT thompsonianp ultrasoundmediateddnatransferforbacteria
AT masontimothyj ultrasoundmediateddnatransferforbacteria
AT prestongailm ultrasoundmediateddnatransferforbacteria
AT liguanghe ultrasoundmediateddnatransferforbacteria
AT paniwnyklarysa ultrasoundmediateddnatransferforbacteria
AT huangweie ultrasoundmediateddnatransferforbacteria