Cargando…

MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature

PURPOSE: The clinical diagnosis and management of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast presents difficulties. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of ILC. Small studies addressing different aspects of MRI in ILC have been p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mann, Ritse M., Hoogeveen, Yvonne L., Blickman, Johan G., Boetes, Carla
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2096637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18043894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9528-5
_version_ 1782138246580404224
author Mann, Ritse M.
Hoogeveen, Yvonne L.
Blickman, Johan G.
Boetes, Carla
author_facet Mann, Ritse M.
Hoogeveen, Yvonne L.
Blickman, Johan G.
Boetes, Carla
author_sort Mann, Ritse M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The clinical diagnosis and management of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast presents difficulties. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of ILC. Small studies addressing different aspects of MRI in ILC have been presented but no large series to date. To address the usefulness of MRI in the work-up of ILC, we performed a review of the currently published literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search using the query “lobular AND (MRI OR MR OR MRT OR magnetic)” in the Cochrane library, PubMed and scholar.google.com, to retrieve all articles that dealt with the use of MRI in patients with ILC. We addressed sensitivity, morphologic appearance, correlation with pathology, detection of additional lesions, and impact of MRI on surgery as different endpoints. Whenever possible we performed meta-analysis of the pooled data. RESULTS: Sensitivity is 93.3% and equal to overall sensitivity of MRI for malignancy in the breast. Morphologic appearance is highly heterogeneous and probably heavily influenced by interreader variability. Correlation with pathology ranges from 0.81 to 0.97; overestimation of lesion size occurs but is rare. In 32% of patients, additional ipsilateral lesions are detected and in 7% contralateral lesions are only detected by MRI. Consequently, MRI induces change in surgical management in 28.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates MRI to be valuable in the work-up of ILC. It provides additional knowledge that cannot be obtained by conventional imaging modalities which can be helpful in patient treatment.
format Text
id pubmed-2096637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20966372007-11-28 MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature Mann, Ritse M. Hoogeveen, Yvonne L. Blickman, Johan G. Boetes, Carla Breast Cancer Res Treat Review PURPOSE: The clinical diagnosis and management of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast presents difficulties. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of ILC. Small studies addressing different aspects of MRI in ILC have been presented but no large series to date. To address the usefulness of MRI in the work-up of ILC, we performed a review of the currently published literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search using the query “lobular AND (MRI OR MR OR MRT OR magnetic)” in the Cochrane library, PubMed and scholar.google.com, to retrieve all articles that dealt with the use of MRI in patients with ILC. We addressed sensitivity, morphologic appearance, correlation with pathology, detection of additional lesions, and impact of MRI on surgery as different endpoints. Whenever possible we performed meta-analysis of the pooled data. RESULTS: Sensitivity is 93.3% and equal to overall sensitivity of MRI for malignancy in the breast. Morphologic appearance is highly heterogeneous and probably heavily influenced by interreader variability. Correlation with pathology ranges from 0.81 to 0.97; overestimation of lesion size occurs but is rare. In 32% of patients, additional ipsilateral lesions are detected and in 7% contralateral lesions are only detected by MRI. Consequently, MRI induces change in surgical management in 28.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates MRI to be valuable in the work-up of ILC. It provides additional knowledge that cannot be obtained by conventional imaging modalities which can be helpful in patient treatment. Springer US 2007-02-15 2008-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2096637/ /pubmed/18043894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9528-5 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007
spellingShingle Review
Mann, Ritse M.
Hoogeveen, Yvonne L.
Blickman, Johan G.
Boetes, Carla
MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature
title MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature
title_full MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature
title_fullStr MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature
title_full_unstemmed MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature
title_short MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature
title_sort mri compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2096637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18043894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9528-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mannritsem mricomparedtoconventionaldiagnosticworkupinthedetectionandevaluationofinvasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastareviewofexistingliterature
AT hoogeveenyvonnel mricomparedtoconventionaldiagnosticworkupinthedetectionandevaluationofinvasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastareviewofexistingliterature
AT blickmanjohang mricomparedtoconventionaldiagnosticworkupinthedetectionandevaluationofinvasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastareviewofexistingliterature
AT boetescarla mricomparedtoconventionaldiagnosticworkupinthedetectionandevaluationofinvasivelobularcarcinomaofthebreastareviewofexistingliterature