Cargando…

Retinal Wave Behavior through Activity-Dependent Refractory Periods

In the developing mammalian visual system, spontaneous retinal ganglion cell (RGC) activity contributes to and drives several aspects of visual system organization. This spontaneous activity takes the form of spreading patches of synchronized bursting that slowly advance across portions of the retin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godfrey, Keith B, Swindale, Nicholas V
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2098868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18052546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030245
_version_ 1782138284189679616
author Godfrey, Keith B
Swindale, Nicholas V
author_facet Godfrey, Keith B
Swindale, Nicholas V
author_sort Godfrey, Keith B
collection PubMed
description In the developing mammalian visual system, spontaneous retinal ganglion cell (RGC) activity contributes to and drives several aspects of visual system organization. This spontaneous activity takes the form of spreading patches of synchronized bursting that slowly advance across portions of the retina. These patches are non-repeating and tile the retina in minutes. Several transmitter systems are known to be involved, but the basic mechanism underlying wave production is still not well-understood. We present a model for retinal waves that focuses on acetylcholine mediated waves but whose principles are adaptable to other developmental stages. Its assumptions are that a) spontaneous depolarizations of amacrine cells drive wave activity; b) amacrine cells are locally connected, and c) cells receiving more input during their depolarization are subsequently less responsive and have longer periods between spontaneous depolarizations. The resulting model produces waves with non-repeating borders and randomly distributed initiation points. The wave generation mechanism appears to be chaotic and does not require neural noise to produce this wave behavior. Variations in parameter settings allow the model to produce waves that are similar in size, frequency, and velocity to those observed in several species. Our results suggest that retinal wave behavior results from activity-dependent refractory periods and that the average velocity of retinal waves depends on the duration a cell is excitatory: longer periods of excitation result in slower waves. In contrast to previous studies, we find that a single layer of cells is sufficient for wave generation. The principles described here are very general and may be adaptable to the description of spontaneous wave activity in other areas of the nervous system.
format Text
id pubmed-2098868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20988682007-11-29 Retinal Wave Behavior through Activity-Dependent Refractory Periods Godfrey, Keith B Swindale, Nicholas V PLoS Comput Biol Research Article In the developing mammalian visual system, spontaneous retinal ganglion cell (RGC) activity contributes to and drives several aspects of visual system organization. This spontaneous activity takes the form of spreading patches of synchronized bursting that slowly advance across portions of the retina. These patches are non-repeating and tile the retina in minutes. Several transmitter systems are known to be involved, but the basic mechanism underlying wave production is still not well-understood. We present a model for retinal waves that focuses on acetylcholine mediated waves but whose principles are adaptable to other developmental stages. Its assumptions are that a) spontaneous depolarizations of amacrine cells drive wave activity; b) amacrine cells are locally connected, and c) cells receiving more input during their depolarization are subsequently less responsive and have longer periods between spontaneous depolarizations. The resulting model produces waves with non-repeating borders and randomly distributed initiation points. The wave generation mechanism appears to be chaotic and does not require neural noise to produce this wave behavior. Variations in parameter settings allow the model to produce waves that are similar in size, frequency, and velocity to those observed in several species. Our results suggest that retinal wave behavior results from activity-dependent refractory periods and that the average velocity of retinal waves depends on the duration a cell is excitatory: longer periods of excitation result in slower waves. In contrast to previous studies, we find that a single layer of cells is sufficient for wave generation. The principles described here are very general and may be adaptable to the description of spontaneous wave activity in other areas of the nervous system. Public Library of Science 2007-11 2007-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2098868/ /pubmed/18052546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030245 Text en © 2007 Godfrey and Swindale. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Godfrey, Keith B
Swindale, Nicholas V
Retinal Wave Behavior through Activity-Dependent Refractory Periods
title Retinal Wave Behavior through Activity-Dependent Refractory Periods
title_full Retinal Wave Behavior through Activity-Dependent Refractory Periods
title_fullStr Retinal Wave Behavior through Activity-Dependent Refractory Periods
title_full_unstemmed Retinal Wave Behavior through Activity-Dependent Refractory Periods
title_short Retinal Wave Behavior through Activity-Dependent Refractory Periods
title_sort retinal wave behavior through activity-dependent refractory periods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2098868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18052546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030245
work_keys_str_mv AT godfreykeithb retinalwavebehaviorthroughactivitydependentrefractoryperiods
AT swindalenicholasv retinalwavebehaviorthroughactivitydependentrefractoryperiods