Cargando…

Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Hawaii

INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence that breast cancer screening reduces morbidity and mortality, many women do not obtain mammograms. Our objective was to analyze the relationship between income and mammography screening for members enrolled in a large health plan in Hawaii. METHODS: We analyzed claims...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halliday, Timothy, Taira, Deborah A, Davis, James, Chan, Henry
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2099289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17875266
_version_ 1782138300914466816
author Halliday, Timothy
Taira, Deborah A
Davis, James
Chan, Henry
author_facet Halliday, Timothy
Taira, Deborah A
Davis, James
Chan, Henry
author_sort Halliday, Timothy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence that breast cancer screening reduces morbidity and mortality, many women do not obtain mammograms. Our objective was to analyze the relationship between income and mammography screening for members enrolled in a large health plan in Hawaii. METHODS: We analyzed claims data for women (N = 46,328) aged 50 to 70 years during 2003 and 2004. We used parametric and nonparametric regression techniques. We used probit estimation to conduct multivariate analysis. RESULTS: At the 5th percentile of the earnings distribution, the probability of mammography is 57.1%, and at the 95th percentile, it is 67.7%. Movement from the 5th percentile to the 35th percentile of the earnings distribution increases the probability of mammography by 0.0378 percentage points. A similar movement from the 65th percentile to the 95th percentile increases the probability by 0.0394 percentage points. Also, we observed an income gradient within narrowly defined geographic regions where physical access to medical care providers is not an issue. CONCLUSION: We observed a steep income gradient in mammography screening in Hawaii. Because of the prevalence of measurement error, this gradient is probably far greater than our estimate. We cannot plausibly attribute our findings to disparities in coverage because 100% of our sample had health insurance coverage. The gradient also does not appear to result from poorer people residing in areas that are geographically isolated from providers of medical care.
format Text
id pubmed-2099289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20992892007-12-28 Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Hawaii Halliday, Timothy Taira, Deborah A Davis, James Chan, Henry Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence that breast cancer screening reduces morbidity and mortality, many women do not obtain mammograms. Our objective was to analyze the relationship between income and mammography screening for members enrolled in a large health plan in Hawaii. METHODS: We analyzed claims data for women (N = 46,328) aged 50 to 70 years during 2003 and 2004. We used parametric and nonparametric regression techniques. We used probit estimation to conduct multivariate analysis. RESULTS: At the 5th percentile of the earnings distribution, the probability of mammography is 57.1%, and at the 95th percentile, it is 67.7%. Movement from the 5th percentile to the 35th percentile of the earnings distribution increases the probability of mammography by 0.0378 percentage points. A similar movement from the 65th percentile to the 95th percentile increases the probability by 0.0394 percentage points. Also, we observed an income gradient within narrowly defined geographic regions where physical access to medical care providers is not an issue. CONCLUSION: We observed a steep income gradient in mammography screening in Hawaii. Because of the prevalence of measurement error, this gradient is probably far greater than our estimate. We cannot plausibly attribute our findings to disparities in coverage because 100% of our sample had health insurance coverage. The gradient also does not appear to result from poorer people residing in areas that are geographically isolated from providers of medical care. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2007-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2099289/ /pubmed/17875266 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Halliday, Timothy
Taira, Deborah A
Davis, James
Chan, Henry
Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Hawaii
title Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Hawaii
title_full Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Hawaii
title_fullStr Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Hawaii
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Hawaii
title_short Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Hawaii
title_sort socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening in hawaii
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2099289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17875266
work_keys_str_mv AT hallidaytimothy socioeconomicdisparitiesinbreastcancerscreeninginhawaii
AT tairadeboraha socioeconomicdisparitiesinbreastcancerscreeninginhawaii
AT davisjames socioeconomicdisparitiesinbreastcancerscreeninginhawaii
AT chanhenry socioeconomicdisparitiesinbreastcancerscreeninginhawaii