Cargando…
Comparison of probabilistic Boolean network and dynamic Bayesian network approaches for inferring gene regulatory networks
BACKGROUND: The regulation of gene expression is achieved through gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in which collections of genes interact with one another and other substances in a cell. In order to understand the underlying function of organisms, it is necessary to study the behavior of genes in a g...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2099481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-S7-S13 |
_version_ | 1782138315051368448 |
---|---|
author | Li, Peng Zhang, Chaoyang Perkins, Edward J Gong, Ping Deng, Youping |
author_facet | Li, Peng Zhang, Chaoyang Perkins, Edward J Gong, Ping Deng, Youping |
author_sort | Li, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The regulation of gene expression is achieved through gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in which collections of genes interact with one another and other substances in a cell. In order to understand the underlying function of organisms, it is necessary to study the behavior of genes in a gene regulatory network context. Several computational approaches are available for modeling gene regulatory networks with different datasets. In order to optimize modeling of GRN, these approaches must be compared and evaluated in terms of accuracy and efficiency. RESULTS: In this paper, two important computational approaches for modeling gene regulatory networks, probabilistic Boolean network methods and dynamic Bayesian network methods, are compared using a biological time-series dataset from the Drosophila Interaction Database to construct a Drosophila gene network. A subset of time points and gene samples from the whole dataset is used to evaluate the performance of these two approaches. CONCLUSION: The comparison indicates that both approaches had good performance in modeling the gene regulatory networks. The accuracy in terms of recall and precision can be improved if a smaller subset of genes is selected for inferring GRNs. The accuracy of both approaches is dependent upon the number of selected genes and time points of gene samples. In all tested cases, DBN identified more gene interactions and gave better recall than PBN. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2099481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20994812007-12-03 Comparison of probabilistic Boolean network and dynamic Bayesian network approaches for inferring gene regulatory networks Li, Peng Zhang, Chaoyang Perkins, Edward J Gong, Ping Deng, Youping BMC Bioinformatics Proceedings BACKGROUND: The regulation of gene expression is achieved through gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in which collections of genes interact with one another and other substances in a cell. In order to understand the underlying function of organisms, it is necessary to study the behavior of genes in a gene regulatory network context. Several computational approaches are available for modeling gene regulatory networks with different datasets. In order to optimize modeling of GRN, these approaches must be compared and evaluated in terms of accuracy and efficiency. RESULTS: In this paper, two important computational approaches for modeling gene regulatory networks, probabilistic Boolean network methods and dynamic Bayesian network methods, are compared using a biological time-series dataset from the Drosophila Interaction Database to construct a Drosophila gene network. A subset of time points and gene samples from the whole dataset is used to evaluate the performance of these two approaches. CONCLUSION: The comparison indicates that both approaches had good performance in modeling the gene regulatory networks. The accuracy in terms of recall and precision can be improved if a smaller subset of genes is selected for inferring GRNs. The accuracy of both approaches is dependent upon the number of selected genes and time points of gene samples. In all tested cases, DBN identified more gene interactions and gave better recall than PBN. BioMed Central 2007-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2099481/ /pubmed/18047712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-S7-S13 Text en Copyright © 2007 Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Li, Peng Zhang, Chaoyang Perkins, Edward J Gong, Ping Deng, Youping Comparison of probabilistic Boolean network and dynamic Bayesian network approaches for inferring gene regulatory networks |
title | Comparison of probabilistic Boolean network and dynamic Bayesian network approaches for inferring gene regulatory networks |
title_full | Comparison of probabilistic Boolean network and dynamic Bayesian network approaches for inferring gene regulatory networks |
title_fullStr | Comparison of probabilistic Boolean network and dynamic Bayesian network approaches for inferring gene regulatory networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of probabilistic Boolean network and dynamic Bayesian network approaches for inferring gene regulatory networks |
title_short | Comparison of probabilistic Boolean network and dynamic Bayesian network approaches for inferring gene regulatory networks |
title_sort | comparison of probabilistic boolean network and dynamic bayesian network approaches for inferring gene regulatory networks |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2099481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18047712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-S7-S13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipeng comparisonofprobabilisticbooleannetworkanddynamicbayesiannetworkapproachesforinferringgeneregulatorynetworks AT zhangchaoyang comparisonofprobabilisticbooleannetworkanddynamicbayesiannetworkapproachesforinferringgeneregulatorynetworks AT perkinsedwardj comparisonofprobabilisticbooleannetworkanddynamicbayesiannetworkapproachesforinferringgeneregulatorynetworks AT gongping comparisonofprobabilisticbooleannetworkanddynamicbayesiannetworkapproachesforinferringgeneregulatorynetworks AT dengyouping comparisonofprobabilisticbooleannetworkanddynamicbayesiannetworkapproachesforinferringgeneregulatorynetworks |