Cargando…

Quantitative analysis of low-resistance junctions between cultured cells and correlation with gap-junctional areas

Electrophysiological studies of low-resistance junctions between Novikoff hepatoma cells grown in suspension cultures were carried out and correlated with gap-junctional areas per inferface determined by freeze-fracture. The mean coupling coefficient between isolated cell pairs was 0.773 +/- 0.025 (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheridan, J. D., Hammer-Wilson, M., Preus, D., Johnson, R. G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1978
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2109986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10605455
_version_ 1782139454814683136
author Sheridan, J. D.
Hammer-Wilson, M.
Preus, D.
Johnson, R. G.
author_facet Sheridan, J. D.
Hammer-Wilson, M.
Preus, D.
Johnson, R. G.
author_sort Sheridan, J. D.
collection PubMed
description Electrophysiological studies of low-resistance junctions between Novikoff hepatoma cells grown in suspension cultures were carried out and correlated with gap-junctional areas per inferface determined by freeze-fracture. The mean coupling coefficient between isolated cell pairs was 0.773 +/- 0.025 (SEM) in 67G medium and 0.653 +/- 0.028 in M67 medium; the respective means for the central pairs of four-cell chains were 0.714 +/- 0.034 and 0.595 +/- 0.026. Mean estimates of nonjunctional resistances for cell pairs were 3.0 +/- 0.32 x 10(7) ohm (67G) and 2.01 +/- 0.01 x 10(7) ohm (M67), and the respective estimates for specific nonjunctional resistances were 158.6 +/- 8.1 ohm-cm2 (67G) and 133.0 +/- 812 ohm-cm2 (M67). Mean estimates of junctional conductances were 0.409 +/- 0.058 x 10(-6) mho (67G) and 0.211 +/- 0.018 x 10(-6) mho (M67) for pairs and 0.291 +/- 0.063 x 10(-6) mho (67G) and 0.212 +/- 0.04 mho (M67) for four-cell chains. The mean area of gap junction per interface for separate cell populations was 0.187 +/- 0.049 micron 2 and 0.269 +/- 0.054 micron 2 for cells fixed in loose pellets and in suspension, respectively. When compared with the mean junctional conductance, these values gave specific junctional conductance estimates of 1.13 x 10(2) mho/cm2 and 0.78 x 10(2) mho/cm2, respectively. These values are higher than most previous estimates, but are consistent with the hypothesis that gap-junctional particles contain central hydrophilic channels, about 2 nm in diameter, which have cytoplasmic resistivity.
format Text
id pubmed-2109986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1978
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21099862008-05-01 Quantitative analysis of low-resistance junctions between cultured cells and correlation with gap-junctional areas Sheridan, J. D. Hammer-Wilson, M. Preus, D. Johnson, R. G. J Cell Biol Journal Article Electrophysiological studies of low-resistance junctions between Novikoff hepatoma cells grown in suspension cultures were carried out and correlated with gap-junctional areas per inferface determined by freeze-fracture. The mean coupling coefficient between isolated cell pairs was 0.773 +/- 0.025 (SEM) in 67G medium and 0.653 +/- 0.028 in M67 medium; the respective means for the central pairs of four-cell chains were 0.714 +/- 0.034 and 0.595 +/- 0.026. Mean estimates of nonjunctional resistances for cell pairs were 3.0 +/- 0.32 x 10(7) ohm (67G) and 2.01 +/- 0.01 x 10(7) ohm (M67), and the respective estimates for specific nonjunctional resistances were 158.6 +/- 8.1 ohm-cm2 (67G) and 133.0 +/- 812 ohm-cm2 (M67). Mean estimates of junctional conductances were 0.409 +/- 0.058 x 10(-6) mho (67G) and 0.211 +/- 0.018 x 10(-6) mho (M67) for pairs and 0.291 +/- 0.063 x 10(-6) mho (67G) and 0.212 +/- 0.04 mho (M67) for four-cell chains. The mean area of gap junction per interface for separate cell populations was 0.187 +/- 0.049 micron 2 and 0.269 +/- 0.054 micron 2 for cells fixed in loose pellets and in suspension, respectively. When compared with the mean junctional conductance, these values gave specific junctional conductance estimates of 1.13 x 10(2) mho/cm2 and 0.78 x 10(2) mho/cm2, respectively. These values are higher than most previous estimates, but are consistent with the hypothesis that gap-junctional particles contain central hydrophilic channels, about 2 nm in diameter, which have cytoplasmic resistivity. The Rockefeller University Press 1978-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2109986/ /pubmed/10605455 Text en This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Journal Article
Sheridan, J. D.
Hammer-Wilson, M.
Preus, D.
Johnson, R. G.
Quantitative analysis of low-resistance junctions between cultured cells and correlation with gap-junctional areas
title Quantitative analysis of low-resistance junctions between cultured cells and correlation with gap-junctional areas
title_full Quantitative analysis of low-resistance junctions between cultured cells and correlation with gap-junctional areas
title_fullStr Quantitative analysis of low-resistance junctions between cultured cells and correlation with gap-junctional areas
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative analysis of low-resistance junctions between cultured cells and correlation with gap-junctional areas
title_short Quantitative analysis of low-resistance junctions between cultured cells and correlation with gap-junctional areas
title_sort quantitative analysis of low-resistance junctions between cultured cells and correlation with gap-junctional areas
topic Journal Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2109986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10605455
work_keys_str_mv AT sheridanjd quantitativeanalysisoflowresistancejunctionsbetweenculturedcellsandcorrelationwithgapjunctionalareas
AT hammerwilsonm quantitativeanalysisoflowresistancejunctionsbetweenculturedcellsandcorrelationwithgapjunctionalareas
AT preusd quantitativeanalysisoflowresistancejunctionsbetweenculturedcellsandcorrelationwithgapjunctionalareas
AT johnsonrg quantitativeanalysisoflowresistancejunctionsbetweenculturedcellsandcorrelationwithgapjunctionalareas