Cargando…
Nascent secretory chain binding and translocation are distinct processes: differentiation by chemical alkylation
We have investigated the effects of chemical alkylation of microsomal membranes on nascent chain binding and translocation. Assays were conducted using either full-length or truncated preprolactin transcripts in combination with a reconstituted membrane system consisting of proteolyzed rough microso...
Formato: | Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
1989
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2115388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2537834 |
_version_ | 1782140644565712896 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | We have investigated the effects of chemical alkylation of microsomal membranes on nascent chain binding and translocation. Assays were conducted using either full-length or truncated preprolactin transcripts in combination with a reconstituted membrane system consisting of proteolyzed rough microsomes and the cytoplasmic domain of the signal recognition particle receptor. Treatment of rough microsomes with N-ethylmaleimide was observed to inhibit preprolactin processing at a site other than the signal recognition particle or the signal recognition particle receptor. As formation of a translocation competent junction between the ribosome/nascent chain complex and the membrane has recently been demonstrated to require GTP (Connolly, T., and R. Gilmore. J. Cell Biol. 1986. 103:2253-2261), the effects of membrane alkylation on this parameter were assessed. N-ethylmaleimide treatment did not inhibit nascent chain targeting or GTP-dependent signal sequence insertion. Translocation of the targeted and inserted nascent chain was, however, blocked. These data indicate (a) that the process of nascent chain translocation is distinct from targeting and signal sequence insertion, and (b) translocation of the peptide chain across the membrane is mediated by an N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive membrane protein component(s). To further substantiate the observation that nascent chain targeting and signal sequence insertion can be distinguished from translocation, the temperature dependencies of the two phenomena were compared. Signal sequence insertion occurred at low temperatures (4 degrees C) and was maximal between 10 and 15 degrees C. Translocation was only observed at higher temperatures and was maximal between 25 and 30 degrees C. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2115388 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1989 |
publisher | The Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21153882008-05-01 Nascent secretory chain binding and translocation are distinct processes: differentiation by chemical alkylation J Cell Biol Articles We have investigated the effects of chemical alkylation of microsomal membranes on nascent chain binding and translocation. Assays were conducted using either full-length or truncated preprolactin transcripts in combination with a reconstituted membrane system consisting of proteolyzed rough microsomes and the cytoplasmic domain of the signal recognition particle receptor. Treatment of rough microsomes with N-ethylmaleimide was observed to inhibit preprolactin processing at a site other than the signal recognition particle or the signal recognition particle receptor. As formation of a translocation competent junction between the ribosome/nascent chain complex and the membrane has recently been demonstrated to require GTP (Connolly, T., and R. Gilmore. J. Cell Biol. 1986. 103:2253-2261), the effects of membrane alkylation on this parameter were assessed. N-ethylmaleimide treatment did not inhibit nascent chain targeting or GTP-dependent signal sequence insertion. Translocation of the targeted and inserted nascent chain was, however, blocked. These data indicate (a) that the process of nascent chain translocation is distinct from targeting and signal sequence insertion, and (b) translocation of the peptide chain across the membrane is mediated by an N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive membrane protein component(s). To further substantiate the observation that nascent chain targeting and signal sequence insertion can be distinguished from translocation, the temperature dependencies of the two phenomena were compared. Signal sequence insertion occurred at low temperatures (4 degrees C) and was maximal between 10 and 15 degrees C. Translocation was only observed at higher temperatures and was maximal between 25 and 30 degrees C. The Rockefeller University Press 1989-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2115388/ /pubmed/2537834 Text en This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Nascent secretory chain binding and translocation are distinct processes: differentiation by chemical alkylation |
title | Nascent secretory chain binding and translocation are distinct processes: differentiation by chemical alkylation |
title_full | Nascent secretory chain binding and translocation are distinct processes: differentiation by chemical alkylation |
title_fullStr | Nascent secretory chain binding and translocation are distinct processes: differentiation by chemical alkylation |
title_full_unstemmed | Nascent secretory chain binding and translocation are distinct processes: differentiation by chemical alkylation |
title_short | Nascent secretory chain binding and translocation are distinct processes: differentiation by chemical alkylation |
title_sort | nascent secretory chain binding and translocation are distinct processes: differentiation by chemical alkylation |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2115388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2537834 |