Cargando…

Membrane channel formation by the lymphocyte pore-forming protein: comparison between susceptible and resistant target cells

The assembly of pores by the pore-forming protein (perforin) of cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer cells on the membranes of different cell lines was studied. Using the patch clamp technique in the whole cell configuration, we measured the conductance increase induced by perforin in s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1990
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2116140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1693622
_version_ 1782140821279080448
collection PubMed
description The assembly of pores by the pore-forming protein (perforin) of cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer cells on the membranes of different cell lines was studied. Using the patch clamp technique in the whole cell configuration, we measured the conductance increase induced by perforin in susceptible cell lines as well as in resistant CTL lines (CTLLs). The results showed that although the amplitudes of the first observed conductance steps produced in both cell types were comparable, CTLLs required at least 10-fold higher doses of perforin to form membrane pores. Outside-out patches excised from CTLL-R8, on the other hand, appeared to be more susceptible to channel formation by perforin than intact cells, as lower doses were able to induce conductance increases. Once channels were induced in CTL membranes, however, their conductances (greater than 1 nS) were indistinguishable from the ones obtained in susceptible cell lines. Fluorescence measurements with quin-2 showed that perforin induced rapid increases in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration in susceptible EL4 cells. In marked contrast, a perforin dose 60-120-fold higher than the minimal dose required to elicit Ca2+ changes in EL4 cells was not able to induce any measurable Ca2+ increase in CTLL-R8. The data suggest that the resistance of CTLs to lysis mediated by their own mediator perforin is at least in part due to their ability to avoid pore formation by this protein. The mechanism underlying this phenomenon is not yet understood, but the observation that outside-out patches excised from CTLL-R8 are more susceptible to channel formation by perforin than intact cells raises the possibility that an intracellular mechanism may be involved.
format Text
id pubmed-2116140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1990
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21161402008-05-01 Membrane channel formation by the lymphocyte pore-forming protein: comparison between susceptible and resistant target cells J Cell Biol Articles The assembly of pores by the pore-forming protein (perforin) of cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer cells on the membranes of different cell lines was studied. Using the patch clamp technique in the whole cell configuration, we measured the conductance increase induced by perforin in susceptible cell lines as well as in resistant CTL lines (CTLLs). The results showed that although the amplitudes of the first observed conductance steps produced in both cell types were comparable, CTLLs required at least 10-fold higher doses of perforin to form membrane pores. Outside-out patches excised from CTLL-R8, on the other hand, appeared to be more susceptible to channel formation by perforin than intact cells, as lower doses were able to induce conductance increases. Once channels were induced in CTL membranes, however, their conductances (greater than 1 nS) were indistinguishable from the ones obtained in susceptible cell lines. Fluorescence measurements with quin-2 showed that perforin induced rapid increases in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration in susceptible EL4 cells. In marked contrast, a perforin dose 60-120-fold higher than the minimal dose required to elicit Ca2+ changes in EL4 cells was not able to induce any measurable Ca2+ increase in CTLL-R8. The data suggest that the resistance of CTLs to lysis mediated by their own mediator perforin is at least in part due to their ability to avoid pore formation by this protein. The mechanism underlying this phenomenon is not yet understood, but the observation that outside-out patches excised from CTLL-R8 are more susceptible to channel formation by perforin than intact cells raises the possibility that an intracellular mechanism may be involved. The Rockefeller University Press 1990-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2116140/ /pubmed/1693622 Text en This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Membrane channel formation by the lymphocyte pore-forming protein: comparison between susceptible and resistant target cells
title Membrane channel formation by the lymphocyte pore-forming protein: comparison between susceptible and resistant target cells
title_full Membrane channel formation by the lymphocyte pore-forming protein: comparison between susceptible and resistant target cells
title_fullStr Membrane channel formation by the lymphocyte pore-forming protein: comparison between susceptible and resistant target cells
title_full_unstemmed Membrane channel formation by the lymphocyte pore-forming protein: comparison between susceptible and resistant target cells
title_short Membrane channel formation by the lymphocyte pore-forming protein: comparison between susceptible and resistant target cells
title_sort membrane channel formation by the lymphocyte pore-forming protein: comparison between susceptible and resistant target cells
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2116140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1693622