Cargando…
Modification and re-validation of the ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for pesticides in produce
The ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for determination of pesticide residues in produce has been modified for gas chromatographic (GC) analysis by implementation of dispersive solid-phase extraction (using primary–secondary amine and graphitized carbon black) and large-volume (20 μL) injecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2117333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17563885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1357-1 |
_version_ | 1782140901493047296 |
---|---|
author | Mol, Hans G. J. Rooseboom, Astrid van Dam, Ruud Roding, Marleen Arondeus, Karin Sunarto, Suryati |
author_facet | Mol, Hans G. J. Rooseboom, Astrid van Dam, Ruud Roding, Marleen Arondeus, Karin Sunarto, Suryati |
author_sort | Mol, Hans G. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for determination of pesticide residues in produce has been modified for gas chromatographic (GC) analysis by implementation of dispersive solid-phase extraction (using primary–secondary amine and graphitized carbon black) and large-volume (20 μL) injection. The same extract, before clean-up and after a change of solvent, was also analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS–MS). All aspects related to sample preparation were re-assessed with regard to ease and speed of the analysis. The principle of the extraction procedure (solvent, salt) was not changed, to avoid the possibility invalidating data acquired over past decades. The modifications were made with techniques currently commonly applied in routine laboratories, GC–MS and LC–MS–MS, in mind. The modified method enables processing (from homogenization until final extracts for both GC and LC) of 30 samples per eight hours per person. Limits of quantification (LOQs) of 0.01 mg kg(−1) were achieved with both GC–MS (full-scan acquisition, 10 mg matrix equivalent injected) and LC–MS–MS (2 mg injected) for most of the pesticides. Validation data for 341 pesticides and degradation products are presented. A compilation of analytical quality-control data for pesticides routinely analyzed by GC–MS (135 compounds) and LC–MS–MS (136 compounds) in over 100 different matrices, obtained over a period of 15 months, are also presented and discussed. At the 0.05 mg kg(−1) level acceptable recoveries were obtained for 93% (GC–MS) and 92% (LC–MS–MS) of pesticide–matrix combinations. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2117333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21173332007-12-07 Modification and re-validation of the ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for pesticides in produce Mol, Hans G. J. Rooseboom, Astrid van Dam, Ruud Roding, Marleen Arondeus, Karin Sunarto, Suryati Anal Bioanal Chem Original Paper The ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for determination of pesticide residues in produce has been modified for gas chromatographic (GC) analysis by implementation of dispersive solid-phase extraction (using primary–secondary amine and graphitized carbon black) and large-volume (20 μL) injection. The same extract, before clean-up and after a change of solvent, was also analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS–MS). All aspects related to sample preparation were re-assessed with regard to ease and speed of the analysis. The principle of the extraction procedure (solvent, salt) was not changed, to avoid the possibility invalidating data acquired over past decades. The modifications were made with techniques currently commonly applied in routine laboratories, GC–MS and LC–MS–MS, in mind. The modified method enables processing (from homogenization until final extracts for both GC and LC) of 30 samples per eight hours per person. Limits of quantification (LOQs) of 0.01 mg kg(−1) were achieved with both GC–MS (full-scan acquisition, 10 mg matrix equivalent injected) and LC–MS–MS (2 mg injected) for most of the pesticides. Validation data for 341 pesticides and degradation products are presented. A compilation of analytical quality-control data for pesticides routinely analyzed by GC–MS (135 compounds) and LC–MS–MS (136 compounds) in over 100 different matrices, obtained over a period of 15 months, are also presented and discussed. At the 0.05 mg kg(−1) level acceptable recoveries were obtained for 93% (GC–MS) and 92% (LC–MS–MS) of pesticide–matrix combinations. Springer-Verlag 2007-06-12 2007-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2117333/ /pubmed/17563885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1357-1 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007 |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Mol, Hans G. J. Rooseboom, Astrid van Dam, Ruud Roding, Marleen Arondeus, Karin Sunarto, Suryati Modification and re-validation of the ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for pesticides in produce |
title | Modification and re-validation of the ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for pesticides in produce |
title_full | Modification and re-validation of the ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for pesticides in produce |
title_fullStr | Modification and re-validation of the ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for pesticides in produce |
title_full_unstemmed | Modification and re-validation of the ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for pesticides in produce |
title_short | Modification and re-validation of the ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for pesticides in produce |
title_sort | modification and re-validation of the ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for pesticides in produce |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2117333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17563885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1357-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molhansgj modificationandrevalidationoftheethylacetatebasedmultiresiduemethodforpesticidesinproduce AT rooseboomastrid modificationandrevalidationoftheethylacetatebasedmultiresiduemethodforpesticidesinproduce AT vandamruud modificationandrevalidationoftheethylacetatebasedmultiresiduemethodforpesticidesinproduce AT rodingmarleen modificationandrevalidationoftheethylacetatebasedmultiresiduemethodforpesticidesinproduce AT arondeuskarin modificationandrevalidationoftheethylacetatebasedmultiresiduemethodforpesticidesinproduce AT sunartosuryati modificationandrevalidationoftheethylacetatebasedmultiresiduemethodforpesticidesinproduce |