Cargando…
Hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions promoting T cell lineage commitment and maturation
Notch1 (N1) receptor signaling is essential and sufficient for T cell development, and recently developed in vitro culture systems point to members of the Delta family as being the physiological N1 ligands. We explored the ability of Delta1 (DL1) and DL4 to induce T cell lineage commitment and/or ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2118717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17261636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20061442 |
_version_ | 1782141091167862784 |
---|---|
author | Besseyrias, Valerie Fiorini, Emma Strobl, Lothar J. Zimber-Strobl, Ursula Dumortier, Alexis Koch, Ute Arcangeli, Marie-Laure Ezine, Sophie MacDonald, H. Robson Radtke, Freddy |
author_facet | Besseyrias, Valerie Fiorini, Emma Strobl, Lothar J. Zimber-Strobl, Ursula Dumortier, Alexis Koch, Ute Arcangeli, Marie-Laure Ezine, Sophie MacDonald, H. Robson Radtke, Freddy |
author_sort | Besseyrias, Valerie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Notch1 (N1) receptor signaling is essential and sufficient for T cell development, and recently developed in vitro culture systems point to members of the Delta family as being the physiological N1 ligands. We explored the ability of Delta1 (DL1) and DL4 to induce T cell lineage commitment and/or maturation in vitro and in vivo from bone marrow (BM) precursors conditionally gene targeted for N1 and/or N2. In vitro DL1 can trigger T cell lineage commitment via either N1 or N2. N1- or N2-mediated T cell lineage commitment can also occur in the spleen after short-term BM transplantation. However, N2–DL1–mediated signaling does not allow further T cell maturation beyond the CD25(+) stage due to a lack of T cell receptor β expression. In contrast to DL1, DL4 induces and supports T cell commitment and maturation in vitro and in vivo exclusively via specific interaction with N1. Moreover, comparative binding studies show preferential interaction of DL4 with N1, whereas binding of DL1 to N1 is weak. Interestingly, preferential N1–DL4 binding reflects reduced dependence of this interaction on Lunatic fringe, a glycosyl transferase that generally enhances the avidity of Notch receptors for Delta ligands. Collectively, our results establish a hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions in which N1–DL4 exhibits the greatest capacity to induce and support T cell development. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2118717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | The Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21187172007-12-13 Hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions promoting T cell lineage commitment and maturation Besseyrias, Valerie Fiorini, Emma Strobl, Lothar J. Zimber-Strobl, Ursula Dumortier, Alexis Koch, Ute Arcangeli, Marie-Laure Ezine, Sophie MacDonald, H. Robson Radtke, Freddy J Exp Med Articles Notch1 (N1) receptor signaling is essential and sufficient for T cell development, and recently developed in vitro culture systems point to members of the Delta family as being the physiological N1 ligands. We explored the ability of Delta1 (DL1) and DL4 to induce T cell lineage commitment and/or maturation in vitro and in vivo from bone marrow (BM) precursors conditionally gene targeted for N1 and/or N2. In vitro DL1 can trigger T cell lineage commitment via either N1 or N2. N1- or N2-mediated T cell lineage commitment can also occur in the spleen after short-term BM transplantation. However, N2–DL1–mediated signaling does not allow further T cell maturation beyond the CD25(+) stage due to a lack of T cell receptor β expression. In contrast to DL1, DL4 induces and supports T cell commitment and maturation in vitro and in vivo exclusively via specific interaction with N1. Moreover, comparative binding studies show preferential interaction of DL4 with N1, whereas binding of DL1 to N1 is weak. Interestingly, preferential N1–DL4 binding reflects reduced dependence of this interaction on Lunatic fringe, a glycosyl transferase that generally enhances the avidity of Notch receptors for Delta ligands. Collectively, our results establish a hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions in which N1–DL4 exhibits the greatest capacity to induce and support T cell development. The Rockefeller University Press 2007-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2118717/ /pubmed/17261636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20061442 Text en Copyright © 2007, The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Besseyrias, Valerie Fiorini, Emma Strobl, Lothar J. Zimber-Strobl, Ursula Dumortier, Alexis Koch, Ute Arcangeli, Marie-Laure Ezine, Sophie MacDonald, H. Robson Radtke, Freddy Hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions promoting T cell lineage commitment and maturation |
title | Hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions promoting T cell lineage commitment and maturation |
title_full | Hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions promoting T cell lineage commitment and maturation |
title_fullStr | Hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions promoting T cell lineage commitment and maturation |
title_full_unstemmed | Hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions promoting T cell lineage commitment and maturation |
title_short | Hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions promoting T cell lineage commitment and maturation |
title_sort | hierarchy of notch–delta interactions promoting t cell lineage commitment and maturation |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2118717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17261636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20061442 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT besseyriasvalerie hierarchyofnotchdeltainteractionspromotingtcelllineagecommitmentandmaturation AT fioriniemma hierarchyofnotchdeltainteractionspromotingtcelllineagecommitmentandmaturation AT strobllotharj hierarchyofnotchdeltainteractionspromotingtcelllineagecommitmentandmaturation AT zimberstroblursula hierarchyofnotchdeltainteractionspromotingtcelllineagecommitmentandmaturation AT dumortieralexis hierarchyofnotchdeltainteractionspromotingtcelllineagecommitmentandmaturation AT kochute hierarchyofnotchdeltainteractionspromotingtcelllineagecommitmentandmaturation AT arcangelimarielaure hierarchyofnotchdeltainteractionspromotingtcelllineagecommitmentandmaturation AT ezinesophie hierarchyofnotchdeltainteractionspromotingtcelllineagecommitmentandmaturation AT macdonaldhrobson hierarchyofnotchdeltainteractionspromotingtcelllineagecommitmentandmaturation AT radtkefreddy hierarchyofnotchdeltainteractionspromotingtcelllineagecommitmentandmaturation |