Cargando…

THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MICE AND RATS TO INFECTION WITH BACILLUS ABORTUS

1. White mice are highly susceptible to infection by inoculation with Bacillus abortus. The susceptibility appears to be as great as that of the guinea pig, and this animal probably can be substituted satisfactorily for guinea pigs in diagnostic work. 2. Both mice and rats are very refractory to fee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hagan, William A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1922
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2128389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19868705
_version_ 1782142059290820608
author Hagan, William A.
author_facet Hagan, William A.
author_sort Hagan, William A.
collection PubMed
description 1. White mice are highly susceptible to infection by inoculation with Bacillus abortus. The susceptibility appears to be as great as that of the guinea pig, and this animal probably can be substituted satisfactorily for guinea pigs in diagnostic work. 2. Both mice and rats are very refractory to feeding infection with Bacillus aborlus. The failure to infect mice in this way was complete, but the feeding of large amounts of culture gave infection in rats. Subcutaneous inoculation resulted in infection of all the animals. The difficulty of infecting rats and mice with Bacillus abortus by feeding makes it very doubtful whether these animals can have any rôle in the propagation and spread of infectious abortion in cattle.
format Text
id pubmed-2128389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1922
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21283892008-04-18 THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MICE AND RATS TO INFECTION WITH BACILLUS ABORTUS Hagan, William A. J Exp Med Article 1. White mice are highly susceptible to infection by inoculation with Bacillus abortus. The susceptibility appears to be as great as that of the guinea pig, and this animal probably can be substituted satisfactorily for guinea pigs in diagnostic work. 2. Both mice and rats are very refractory to feeding infection with Bacillus aborlus. The failure to infect mice in this way was complete, but the feeding of large amounts of culture gave infection in rats. Subcutaneous inoculation resulted in infection of all the animals. The difficulty of infecting rats and mice with Bacillus abortus by feeding makes it very doubtful whether these animals can have any rôle in the propagation and spread of infectious abortion in cattle. The Rockefeller University Press 1922-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2128389/ /pubmed/19868705 Text en Copyright © Copyright, 1922, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research New York This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hagan, William A.
THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MICE AND RATS TO INFECTION WITH BACILLUS ABORTUS
title THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MICE AND RATS TO INFECTION WITH BACILLUS ABORTUS
title_full THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MICE AND RATS TO INFECTION WITH BACILLUS ABORTUS
title_fullStr THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MICE AND RATS TO INFECTION WITH BACILLUS ABORTUS
title_full_unstemmed THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MICE AND RATS TO INFECTION WITH BACILLUS ABORTUS
title_short THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MICE AND RATS TO INFECTION WITH BACILLUS ABORTUS
title_sort susceptibility of mice and rats to infection with bacillus abortus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2128389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19868705
work_keys_str_mv AT haganwilliama thesusceptibilityofmiceandratstoinfectionwithbacillusabortus
AT haganwilliama susceptibilityofmiceandratstoinfectionwithbacillusabortus