Cargando…

High-Protein Weight Loss Diets and Purported Adverse Effects: Where is the Evidence?

Results of several recent studies show that high-protein, low-carbohydrate weight loss diets indeed have their benefits. However, agencies such as the American Heart Association (AHA) have some concerns about possible health risks. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the scientific validity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Manninen, Anssi H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2129142/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-1-1-45
_version_ 1782142120885223424
author Manninen, Anssi H
author_facet Manninen, Anssi H
author_sort Manninen, Anssi H
collection PubMed
description Results of several recent studies show that high-protein, low-carbohydrate weight loss diets indeed have their benefits. However, agencies such as the American Heart Association (AHA) have some concerns about possible health risks. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the scientific validity of AHA Nutrition Committee's statement on dietary protein and weight reduction (St. Jeor ST et al. Circulation 2001;104:1869–1874), which states: "Individuals who follow these [high-protein] diets are risk for ... potential cardiac, renal, bone, and liver abnormalities overall. Simply stated, there is no scientific evidence whatsoever that high-protein intake has adverse effects on liver function. Relative to renal function, there are no data in the scientific literature demonstrating that healthy kidneys are damaged by the increased demands of protein consumed in quantities 2–3 times above the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA). In contrast with the earlier hypothesis that high-protein intake promotes osteoporosis, some epidemiological studies found a positive association between protein intake and bone mineral density. Further, recent studies studies suggest, at least in the short term, that RDA for protein (0.8 g/kg) does not support normal calcium homeostasis. Finally, a negative correlation has been shown between protein intake and systolic and diastolic blood pressures in several epidemiological surveys. In conclusion, there is little if any scientific evidence supporting above mentioned statement. Certainly, such public warnings should be based on a thorough analysis of the scientific literature, not unsubstantiated fears and misrepresentations. For individuals with normal renal function, the risks are minimal and must be balanced against the real and established risk of continued obesity.
format Text
id pubmed-2129142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21291422007-12-12 High-Protein Weight Loss Diets and Purported Adverse Effects: Where is the Evidence? Manninen, Anssi H J Int Soc Sports Nutr Review Results of several recent studies show that high-protein, low-carbohydrate weight loss diets indeed have their benefits. However, agencies such as the American Heart Association (AHA) have some concerns about possible health risks. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the scientific validity of AHA Nutrition Committee's statement on dietary protein and weight reduction (St. Jeor ST et al. Circulation 2001;104:1869–1874), which states: "Individuals who follow these [high-protein] diets are risk for ... potential cardiac, renal, bone, and liver abnormalities overall. Simply stated, there is no scientific evidence whatsoever that high-protein intake has adverse effects on liver function. Relative to renal function, there are no data in the scientific literature demonstrating that healthy kidneys are damaged by the increased demands of protein consumed in quantities 2–3 times above the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA). In contrast with the earlier hypothesis that high-protein intake promotes osteoporosis, some epidemiological studies found a positive association between protein intake and bone mineral density. Further, recent studies studies suggest, at least in the short term, that RDA for protein (0.8 g/kg) does not support normal calcium homeostasis. Finally, a negative correlation has been shown between protein intake and systolic and diastolic blood pressures in several epidemiological surveys. In conclusion, there is little if any scientific evidence supporting above mentioned statement. Certainly, such public warnings should be based on a thorough analysis of the scientific literature, not unsubstantiated fears and misrepresentations. For individuals with normal renal function, the risks are minimal and must be balanced against the real and established risk of continued obesity. BioMed Central 2004-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2129142/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-1-1-45 Text en Copyright © 2004 A National Library of Congress Indexed Journal
spellingShingle Review
Manninen, Anssi H
High-Protein Weight Loss Diets and Purported Adverse Effects: Where is the Evidence?
title High-Protein Weight Loss Diets and Purported Adverse Effects: Where is the Evidence?
title_full High-Protein Weight Loss Diets and Purported Adverse Effects: Where is the Evidence?
title_fullStr High-Protein Weight Loss Diets and Purported Adverse Effects: Where is the Evidence?
title_full_unstemmed High-Protein Weight Loss Diets and Purported Adverse Effects: Where is the Evidence?
title_short High-Protein Weight Loss Diets and Purported Adverse Effects: Where is the Evidence?
title_sort high-protein weight loss diets and purported adverse effects: where is the evidence?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2129142/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-1-1-45
work_keys_str_mv AT manninenanssih highproteinweightlossdietsandpurportedadverseeffectswhereistheevidence