Cargando…

THE ACTION OF THE LEVADITI STRAIN OF HERPES VIRUS, AND OF VACCINE VIRUS IN THE GUINEA PIG : SINGLE AND COMBINED EFFECTS.

A number of methods have been employed in attempts to induce encephalitis in guinea pigs with the Levaditi C strain of herpes virus. Some of these consisted of different modes of inoculation of the virus itself and others of different ways of combining it with vesicular stomatitis and neurovaccine v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olitsky, Peter K., Long, Perrin H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1928
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2131474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19869492
_version_ 1782142243508846592
author Olitsky, Peter K.
Long, Perrin H.
author_facet Olitsky, Peter K.
Long, Perrin H.
author_sort Olitsky, Peter K.
collection PubMed
description A number of methods have been employed in attempts to induce encephalitis in guinea pigs with the Levaditi C strain of herpes virus. Some of these consisted of different modes of inoculation of the virus itself and others of different ways of combining it with vesicular stomatitis and neurovaccine viruses so as to obtain the concomitant effects of both. In still another test the Levaditi virus was combined with the neurovaccine in a manner calculated to bring about the maximum action of each at the same time. By all these methods, the Levaditi virus failed to evoke the characteristic encephalitis which this specimen is capable of inducing uniformly in rabbits. On the other hand, when the Levaditi herpes virus is inoculated into the brain of guinea pigs in conjunction with suitably timed corneal injections, it acquires active encephalitogenic properties. The results just noted suggest several considerations: 1. The possibility of increasing the virulence of a filtrable virus by animal passage in a special manner. It is not likely that the increase as observed was due to dosage, for after the virus acquired its encephalitogenic property for guinea pigs, the usual amounts of virus suspensions sufficed to induce, in a uniform way, typical encephalitis. 2. The opinion previously expressed by Flexner that the guinea pig serves merely to separate weak from strong strains of herpes virus is supported: for only according to the particular method described, could the encephalitogenic power of the Levaditi virus be developed and the weak be converted into a strong herpes strain. With the acquisition of this power, the Levaditi virus acted in precisely the same manner as strong herpes strains both in the guinea pig and the rabbit. Moreover, it was shown in guinea pigs that cross-immunity occurs between weak and strong strains. 3. The two samples of neurovaccine virus employed were incapable of inducing encephalitis in guinea pigs after intracutaneous, intratesticular, corneal, or intracerebral inoculation, although they were actively encephalitogenic in rabbits. In spite of the fact that the vaccine virus and herpes virus are different, as shown by the histopathology and absence of cross-immunity, they behave in the same way when injected into the brain of the guinea pig. The failure of the concomitant action of both viruses to induce encephalitis in the guinea pig suggests that the association of two viruses, under the experimental conditions outlined, is incapable of inducing encephalitis, if either, by itself, is non-encephalitogenic. 4. The serum from normal guinea pigs may neutralize a weak (Levaditi C) but not a strong (H.F.) strain of herpes virus; but the neutralizing action of the serum on Levaditi C virus is not uniform. 5. The Levaditi strain of virus can increase in quantity in the brain of the guinea pig to a degree which permits detection and yet fails to evoke any distinctive clinical picture or definite histopathological changes. 6. Repeated intraperitoneal injections of Levaditi virus in guinea pigs elicit no signs of infection, yet they induce a solid immunity to strong strains of herpes virus.
format Text
id pubmed-2131474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1928
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21314742008-04-18 THE ACTION OF THE LEVADITI STRAIN OF HERPES VIRUS, AND OF VACCINE VIRUS IN THE GUINEA PIG : SINGLE AND COMBINED EFFECTS. Olitsky, Peter K. Long, Perrin H. J Exp Med Article A number of methods have been employed in attempts to induce encephalitis in guinea pigs with the Levaditi C strain of herpes virus. Some of these consisted of different modes of inoculation of the virus itself and others of different ways of combining it with vesicular stomatitis and neurovaccine viruses so as to obtain the concomitant effects of both. In still another test the Levaditi virus was combined with the neurovaccine in a manner calculated to bring about the maximum action of each at the same time. By all these methods, the Levaditi virus failed to evoke the characteristic encephalitis which this specimen is capable of inducing uniformly in rabbits. On the other hand, when the Levaditi herpes virus is inoculated into the brain of guinea pigs in conjunction with suitably timed corneal injections, it acquires active encephalitogenic properties. The results just noted suggest several considerations: 1. The possibility of increasing the virulence of a filtrable virus by animal passage in a special manner. It is not likely that the increase as observed was due to dosage, for after the virus acquired its encephalitogenic property for guinea pigs, the usual amounts of virus suspensions sufficed to induce, in a uniform way, typical encephalitis. 2. The opinion previously expressed by Flexner that the guinea pig serves merely to separate weak from strong strains of herpes virus is supported: for only according to the particular method described, could the encephalitogenic power of the Levaditi virus be developed and the weak be converted into a strong herpes strain. With the acquisition of this power, the Levaditi virus acted in precisely the same manner as strong herpes strains both in the guinea pig and the rabbit. Moreover, it was shown in guinea pigs that cross-immunity occurs between weak and strong strains. 3. The two samples of neurovaccine virus employed were incapable of inducing encephalitis in guinea pigs after intracutaneous, intratesticular, corneal, or intracerebral inoculation, although they were actively encephalitogenic in rabbits. In spite of the fact that the vaccine virus and herpes virus are different, as shown by the histopathology and absence of cross-immunity, they behave in the same way when injected into the brain of the guinea pig. The failure of the concomitant action of both viruses to induce encephalitis in the guinea pig suggests that the association of two viruses, under the experimental conditions outlined, is incapable of inducing encephalitis, if either, by itself, is non-encephalitogenic. 4. The serum from normal guinea pigs may neutralize a weak (Levaditi C) but not a strong (H.F.) strain of herpes virus; but the neutralizing action of the serum on Levaditi C virus is not uniform. 5. The Levaditi strain of virus can increase in quantity in the brain of the guinea pig to a degree which permits detection and yet fails to evoke any distinctive clinical picture or definite histopathological changes. 6. Repeated intraperitoneal injections of Levaditi virus in guinea pigs elicit no signs of infection, yet they induce a solid immunity to strong strains of herpes virus. The Rockefeller University Press 1928-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2131474/ /pubmed/19869492 Text en Copyright © Copyright, 1928, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research New York This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Olitsky, Peter K.
Long, Perrin H.
THE ACTION OF THE LEVADITI STRAIN OF HERPES VIRUS, AND OF VACCINE VIRUS IN THE GUINEA PIG : SINGLE AND COMBINED EFFECTS.
title THE ACTION OF THE LEVADITI STRAIN OF HERPES VIRUS, AND OF VACCINE VIRUS IN THE GUINEA PIG : SINGLE AND COMBINED EFFECTS.
title_full THE ACTION OF THE LEVADITI STRAIN OF HERPES VIRUS, AND OF VACCINE VIRUS IN THE GUINEA PIG : SINGLE AND COMBINED EFFECTS.
title_fullStr THE ACTION OF THE LEVADITI STRAIN OF HERPES VIRUS, AND OF VACCINE VIRUS IN THE GUINEA PIG : SINGLE AND COMBINED EFFECTS.
title_full_unstemmed THE ACTION OF THE LEVADITI STRAIN OF HERPES VIRUS, AND OF VACCINE VIRUS IN THE GUINEA PIG : SINGLE AND COMBINED EFFECTS.
title_short THE ACTION OF THE LEVADITI STRAIN OF HERPES VIRUS, AND OF VACCINE VIRUS IN THE GUINEA PIG : SINGLE AND COMBINED EFFECTS.
title_sort action of the levaditi strain of herpes virus, and of vaccine virus in the guinea pig : single and combined effects.
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2131474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19869492
work_keys_str_mv AT olitskypeterk theactionofthelevaditistrainofherpesvirusandofvaccinevirusintheguineapigsingleandcombinedeffects
AT longperrinh theactionofthelevaditistrainofherpesvirusandofvaccinevirusintheguineapigsingleandcombinedeffects
AT olitskypeterk actionofthelevaditistrainofherpesvirusandofvaccinevirusintheguineapigsingleandcombinedeffects
AT longperrinh actionofthelevaditistrainofherpesvirusandofvaccinevirusintheguineapigsingleandcombinedeffects