Cargando…

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)

BACKGROUND: Thousands of systematic reviews have been conducted in all areas of health care. However, the methodological quality of these reviews is variable and should routinely be appraised. AMSTAR is a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews. METHODOLOGY: AMSTAR was used to appraise 42 revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shea, Beverley J., Bouter, Lex M., Peterson, Joan, Boers, Maarten, Andersson, Neil, Ortiz, Zulma, Ramsay, Tim, Bai, Annie, Shukla, Vijay K., Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2131785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18159233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001350

Ejemplares similares

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
por: Shea, Beverley, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
por: Kang, Deying, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
por: Kim, Hye-Ryeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Reviews Using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement
por: Burda, Brittany U., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
por: Wegewitz, Uta, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools
por: Pereira, Alexandre-Godinho, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption
por: Bojcic, Ruzica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2
por: Perry, R., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano
Publicado: (2015)

Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines
por: Kelly, Shannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Editorial Perspective: Time for Another Grading System—From PRISMA to AMSTAR 2
por: Chapman, Jens R.
Publicado: (2020)

An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia using both AMSTAR and ROBIS as quality assessment tools
por: Perry, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Abstract: Assessing Quality in Systematic Reviews: Application of AMSTAR Criteria to Plastic Surgery Literature
por: Jenny, Hillary E., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR
por: Wu, Xinyu, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
por: Pollock, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study
por: Lu, Cuncun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

157: ASSESSING THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS) SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS BY AMSTAR CHECKLIST
por: Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Commentary on: Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Gould, Daniel J
Publicado: (2021)

User experience of applying AMSTAR 2 to appraise systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a commentary
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2
por: Guan, Xin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity
por: Bouter, Lex
Publicado: (2020)

Different Approaches to Appraising Systematic Reviews of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion Using AMSTAR 2 Tool: Cross-Sectional Study
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Invited Commentary on “Investigating the Reliability and Factor Structure of Kalichman’s ‘Survey 2: Research Misconduct’ Questionnaire”
por: Bouter, Lex M.
Publicado: (2017)

AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
por: Li, Lin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Increasing the demand for childhood vaccination in developing countries: a systematic review
por: Shea, Beverley, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
por: SEQUEIRA-BYRON, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study
por: Oh, Jae Hoon, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Impact and Treatment of Sarcopenia in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy: A Multidisciplinary, AMSTAR-2 Compliant Review of Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses
por: Medici, Federica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
por: de Vet, Henrica C. W., et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals
por: Dettori, Joseph R., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_8fo9tbprhv2lnvketf23750ls4