IS THE LOCAL VASODILATATION AFTER DIFFERENT TISSUE INJURIES REFERABLE TO A SINGLE CAUSE?

Experiment shows that the vascular contraction responsible for Bier's spotting prevails over the local vasodilatation due to mechanical injury of the skin, and causes the local reddening to blanch. It is without effect, however, upon the local vasodilatation caused by histamine pricked into the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rous, Peyton, Gilding, H. P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1930
Materias:
Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2131802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19869675
_version_ 1782142298203619328
author Rous, Peyton
Gilding, H. P.
author_facet Rous, Peyton
Gilding, H. P.
author_sort Rous, Peyton
collection PubMed
description Experiment shows that the vascular contraction responsible for Bier's spotting prevails over the local vasodilatation due to mechanical injury of the skin, and causes the local reddening to blanch. It is without effect, however, upon the local vasodilatation caused by histamine pricked into the skin. The results raise doubts concerning the validity of the hypothesis referring all local vasodilatations to the action of a single chemical substance or set of substances ("H substance"), liberated within the tissues.
format Text
id pubmed-2131802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1930
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21318022008-04-18 IS THE LOCAL VASODILATATION AFTER DIFFERENT TISSUE INJURIES REFERABLE TO A SINGLE CAUSE? Rous, Peyton Gilding, H. P. J Exp Med Article Experiment shows that the vascular contraction responsible for Bier's spotting prevails over the local vasodilatation due to mechanical injury of the skin, and causes the local reddening to blanch. It is without effect, however, upon the local vasodilatation caused by histamine pricked into the skin. The results raise doubts concerning the validity of the hypothesis referring all local vasodilatations to the action of a single chemical substance or set of substances ("H substance"), liberated within the tissues. The Rockefeller University Press 1930-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2131802/ /pubmed/19869675 Text en Copyright © Copyright, 1930, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research New York This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rous, Peyton
Gilding, H. P.
IS THE LOCAL VASODILATATION AFTER DIFFERENT TISSUE INJURIES REFERABLE TO A SINGLE CAUSE?
title IS THE LOCAL VASODILATATION AFTER DIFFERENT TISSUE INJURIES REFERABLE TO A SINGLE CAUSE?
title_full IS THE LOCAL VASODILATATION AFTER DIFFERENT TISSUE INJURIES REFERABLE TO A SINGLE CAUSE?
title_fullStr IS THE LOCAL VASODILATATION AFTER DIFFERENT TISSUE INJURIES REFERABLE TO A SINGLE CAUSE?
title_full_unstemmed IS THE LOCAL VASODILATATION AFTER DIFFERENT TISSUE INJURIES REFERABLE TO A SINGLE CAUSE?
title_short IS THE LOCAL VASODILATATION AFTER DIFFERENT TISSUE INJURIES REFERABLE TO A SINGLE CAUSE?
title_sort is the local vasodilatation after different tissue injuries referable to a single cause?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2131802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19869675
work_keys_str_mv AT rouspeyton isthelocalvasodilatationafterdifferenttissueinjuriesreferabletoasinglecause
AT gildinghp isthelocalvasodilatationafterdifferenttissueinjuriesreferabletoasinglecause

Ejemplares similares