Cargando…

Chromosome Structuring Limits Genome Plasticity in Escherichia coli

Chromosome organizations of related bacterial genera are well conserved despite a very long divergence period. We have assessed the forces limiting bacterial genome plasticity in Escherichia coli by measuring the respective effect of altering different parameters, including DNA replication, composit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esnault, Emilie, Valens, Michèle, Espéli, Olivier, Boccard, Frédéric
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2134941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18085828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030226
_version_ 1782142784007831552
author Esnault, Emilie
Valens, Michèle
Espéli, Olivier
Boccard, Frédéric
author_facet Esnault, Emilie
Valens, Michèle
Espéli, Olivier
Boccard, Frédéric
author_sort Esnault, Emilie
collection PubMed
description Chromosome organizations of related bacterial genera are well conserved despite a very long divergence period. We have assessed the forces limiting bacterial genome plasticity in Escherichia coli by measuring the respective effect of altering different parameters, including DNA replication, compositional skew of replichores, coordination of gene expression with DNA replication, replication-associated gene dosage, and chromosome organization into macrodomains. Chromosomes were rearranged by large inversions. Changes in the compositional skew of replichores, in the coordination of gene expression with DNA replication or in the replication-associated gene dosage have only a moderate effect on cell physiology because large rearrangements inverting the orientation of several hundred genes inside a replichore are only slightly detrimental. By contrast, changing the balance between the two replication arms has a more drastic effect, and the recombinational rescue of replication forks is required for cell viability when one of the chromosome arms is less than half than the other one. Macrodomain organization also appears to be a major factor restricting chromosome plasticity, and two types of inverted configurations severely affect the cell cycle. First, the disruption of the Ter macrodomain with replication forks merging far from the normal replichore junction provoked chromosome segregation defects. The second major problematic configurations resulted from inversions between Ori and Right macrodomains, which perturb nucleoid distribution and early steps of cytokinesis. Consequences for the control of the bacterial cell cycle and for the evolution of bacterial chromosome configuration are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-2134941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21349412007-12-14 Chromosome Structuring Limits Genome Plasticity in Escherichia coli Esnault, Emilie Valens, Michèle Espéli, Olivier Boccard, Frédéric PLoS Genet Research Article Chromosome organizations of related bacterial genera are well conserved despite a very long divergence period. We have assessed the forces limiting bacterial genome plasticity in Escherichia coli by measuring the respective effect of altering different parameters, including DNA replication, compositional skew of replichores, coordination of gene expression with DNA replication, replication-associated gene dosage, and chromosome organization into macrodomains. Chromosomes were rearranged by large inversions. Changes in the compositional skew of replichores, in the coordination of gene expression with DNA replication or in the replication-associated gene dosage have only a moderate effect on cell physiology because large rearrangements inverting the orientation of several hundred genes inside a replichore are only slightly detrimental. By contrast, changing the balance between the two replication arms has a more drastic effect, and the recombinational rescue of replication forks is required for cell viability when one of the chromosome arms is less than half than the other one. Macrodomain organization also appears to be a major factor restricting chromosome plasticity, and two types of inverted configurations severely affect the cell cycle. First, the disruption of the Ter macrodomain with replication forks merging far from the normal replichore junction provoked chromosome segregation defects. The second major problematic configurations resulted from inversions between Ori and Right macrodomains, which perturb nucleoid distribution and early steps of cytokinesis. Consequences for the control of the bacterial cell cycle and for the evolution of bacterial chromosome configuration are discussed. Public Library of Science 2007-12 2007-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2134941/ /pubmed/18085828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030226 Text en © 2007 Esnault et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Esnault, Emilie
Valens, Michèle
Espéli, Olivier
Boccard, Frédéric
Chromosome Structuring Limits Genome Plasticity in Escherichia coli
title Chromosome Structuring Limits Genome Plasticity in Escherichia coli
title_full Chromosome Structuring Limits Genome Plasticity in Escherichia coli
title_fullStr Chromosome Structuring Limits Genome Plasticity in Escherichia coli
title_full_unstemmed Chromosome Structuring Limits Genome Plasticity in Escherichia coli
title_short Chromosome Structuring Limits Genome Plasticity in Escherichia coli
title_sort chromosome structuring limits genome plasticity in escherichia coli
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2134941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18085828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030226
work_keys_str_mv AT esnaultemilie chromosomestructuringlimitsgenomeplasticityinescherichiacoli
AT valensmichele chromosomestructuringlimitsgenomeplasticityinescherichiacoli
AT espeliolivier chromosomestructuringlimitsgenomeplasticityinescherichiacoli
AT boccardfrederic chromosomestructuringlimitsgenomeplasticityinescherichiacoli