THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO OPTIMUM PROPORTIONS FLOCCULATION RATIOS

The fact that the optimum proportion flocculation ratio is different when determined by the α (Dean and Webb) and β (Ramon) procedures is pointed out. It is demonstrated that this difference is a consequence of the difference in the two methods, and that the two optima, though they may in certain ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyd, William C., Purnell, Marjorie A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1944
Materias:
Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2135473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19871416
_version_ 1782142904987287552
author Boyd, William C.
Purnell, Marjorie A.
author_facet Boyd, William C.
Purnell, Marjorie A.
author_sort Boyd, William C.
collection PubMed
description The fact that the optimum proportion flocculation ratio is different when determined by the α (Dean and Webb) and β (Ramon) procedures is pointed out. It is demonstrated that this difference is a consequence of the difference in the two methods, and that the two optima, though they may in certain cases lie near together, can never coincide. A new ratio (the ε ratio), intermediate between the α and β ratios, and having theoretical advantages over both of them, is defined.
format Text
id pubmed-2135473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1944
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21354732008-04-18 THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO OPTIMUM PROPORTIONS FLOCCULATION RATIOS Boyd, William C. Purnell, Marjorie A. J Exp Med Article The fact that the optimum proportion flocculation ratio is different when determined by the α (Dean and Webb) and β (Ramon) procedures is pointed out. It is demonstrated that this difference is a consequence of the difference in the two methods, and that the two optima, though they may in certain cases lie near together, can never coincide. A new ratio (the ε ratio), intermediate between the α and β ratios, and having theoretical advantages over both of them, is defined. The Rockefeller University Press 1944-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2135473/ /pubmed/19871416 Text en Copyright © Copyright, 1944, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research New York This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Boyd, William C.
Purnell, Marjorie A.
THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO OPTIMUM PROPORTIONS FLOCCULATION RATIOS
title THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO OPTIMUM PROPORTIONS FLOCCULATION RATIOS
title_full THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO OPTIMUM PROPORTIONS FLOCCULATION RATIOS
title_fullStr THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO OPTIMUM PROPORTIONS FLOCCULATION RATIOS
title_full_unstemmed THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO OPTIMUM PROPORTIONS FLOCCULATION RATIOS
title_short THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO OPTIMUM PROPORTIONS FLOCCULATION RATIOS
title_sort essential difference between the two optimum proportions flocculation ratios
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2135473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19871416
work_keys_str_mv AT boydwilliamc theessentialdifferencebetweenthetwooptimumproportionsflocculationratios
AT purnellmarjoriea theessentialdifferencebetweenthetwooptimumproportionsflocculationratios
AT boydwilliamc essentialdifferencebetweenthetwooptimumproportionsflocculationratios
AT purnellmarjoriea essentialdifferencebetweenthetwooptimumproportionsflocculationratios

Ejemplares similares