Cargando…
THE RATE OF DIVISION OF ANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS DURING THE EARLY PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE
Mitotic blocking agents, colchicine or Velban, were used to estimate cycle times of spleen cells which release hemolysin for sheep erythrocytes (plaque-forming cells). The cells were obtained either from rats immunized with sheep erythrocytes or from cultures of mouse spleen cells immunized in vitro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
1968
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2138483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5655106 |
_version_ | 1782143573775351808 |
---|---|
author | Rowley, Donald A. Fitch, Frank W. Mosier, Donald E. Solliday, Susan Coppleson, Lionel W. Brown, Barry W. |
author_facet | Rowley, Donald A. Fitch, Frank W. Mosier, Donald E. Solliday, Susan Coppleson, Lionel W. Brown, Barry W. |
author_sort | Rowley, Donald A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mitotic blocking agents, colchicine or Velban, were used to estimate cycle times of spleen cells which release hemolysin for sheep erythrocytes (plaque-forming cells). The cells were obtained either from rats immunized with sheep erythrocytes or from cultures of mouse spleen cells immunized in vitro with the same antigen. 2, 3, or 4 days after immunization, animals or cell cultures were treated with mitotic blocking agents for periods of time ranging from 2.5 to 7 hr; plaque-forming cells were then enumerated. Decreased numbers of plaque-forming cells were found after such treatment. The extent of reduction was a function of duration of the drug treatment and the method of immunization, but was independent of the time after immunization. The evidence presented is consistent with premises that: (a) plaque-forming cells in mitosis do not release sufficient antibody to be detected, (b) mitotic blocking agents, by arresting plaque-forming cells in metaphase, prevent not only detection of these cells but also the increase in number of plaque-forming cells which would have resulted from cell division, (c) mitotic blocking agents do not affect release of antibody by cells in interphase. Cell cycle times, based on the extent of reduction of plaque-forming cells per unit time of drug treatment, were estimated using a mathematical model appropriate for an exponentially increasing population of cells. Cell cycle times estimated using the mitotic blocking agents agreed well with cell doubling times calculated from the increase in plaque-forming cells occurring 1–4 days after immunization. Increased responses produced by higher antigen doses or treatment of immunized animals with an adjuvant resulted from an increased rate of division of responding cells and their progeny. The results are consistent with a cell selection theory of antibody formation. Antigenic stimulation causes relatively few cells to proliferate and to synthesize antibody; apparently the magnitude of the response is dependent primarily on the rate of division of responding cells. It is suggested on the basis of observations of in vitro-immunized cell cultures that the rate of division of responding cells may be dependent on the rate of interaction between two cell types, both of which are essential for the in vitro plaque-forming cell response. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2138483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1968 |
publisher | The Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21384832008-04-17 THE RATE OF DIVISION OF ANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS DURING THE EARLY PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE Rowley, Donald A. Fitch, Frank W. Mosier, Donald E. Solliday, Susan Coppleson, Lionel W. Brown, Barry W. J Exp Med Article Mitotic blocking agents, colchicine or Velban, were used to estimate cycle times of spleen cells which release hemolysin for sheep erythrocytes (plaque-forming cells). The cells were obtained either from rats immunized with sheep erythrocytes or from cultures of mouse spleen cells immunized in vitro with the same antigen. 2, 3, or 4 days after immunization, animals or cell cultures were treated with mitotic blocking agents for periods of time ranging from 2.5 to 7 hr; plaque-forming cells were then enumerated. Decreased numbers of plaque-forming cells were found after such treatment. The extent of reduction was a function of duration of the drug treatment and the method of immunization, but was independent of the time after immunization. The evidence presented is consistent with premises that: (a) plaque-forming cells in mitosis do not release sufficient antibody to be detected, (b) mitotic blocking agents, by arresting plaque-forming cells in metaphase, prevent not only detection of these cells but also the increase in number of plaque-forming cells which would have resulted from cell division, (c) mitotic blocking agents do not affect release of antibody by cells in interphase. Cell cycle times, based on the extent of reduction of plaque-forming cells per unit time of drug treatment, were estimated using a mathematical model appropriate for an exponentially increasing population of cells. Cell cycle times estimated using the mitotic blocking agents agreed well with cell doubling times calculated from the increase in plaque-forming cells occurring 1–4 days after immunization. Increased responses produced by higher antigen doses or treatment of immunized animals with an adjuvant resulted from an increased rate of division of responding cells and their progeny. The results are consistent with a cell selection theory of antibody formation. Antigenic stimulation causes relatively few cells to proliferate and to synthesize antibody; apparently the magnitude of the response is dependent primarily on the rate of division of responding cells. It is suggested on the basis of observations of in vitro-immunized cell cultures that the rate of division of responding cells may be dependent on the rate of interaction between two cell types, both of which are essential for the in vitro plaque-forming cell response. The Rockefeller University Press 1968-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2138483/ /pubmed/5655106 Text en Copyright © 1968 by The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rowley, Donald A. Fitch, Frank W. Mosier, Donald E. Solliday, Susan Coppleson, Lionel W. Brown, Barry W. THE RATE OF DIVISION OF ANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS DURING THE EARLY PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE |
title | THE RATE OF DIVISION OF ANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS DURING THE EARLY PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE |
title_full | THE RATE OF DIVISION OF ANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS DURING THE EARLY PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE |
title_fullStr | THE RATE OF DIVISION OF ANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS DURING THE EARLY PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE |
title_full_unstemmed | THE RATE OF DIVISION OF ANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS DURING THE EARLY PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE |
title_short | THE RATE OF DIVISION OF ANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS DURING THE EARLY PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE |
title_sort | rate of division of antibody-forming cells during the early primary immune response |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2138483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5655106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rowleydonalda therateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT fitchfrankw therateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT mosierdonalde therateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT sollidaysusan therateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT copplesonlionelw therateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT brownbarryw therateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT rowleydonalda rateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT fitchfrankw rateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT mosierdonalde rateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT sollidaysusan rateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT copplesonlionelw rateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse AT brownbarryw rateofdivisionofantibodyformingcellsduringtheearlyprimaryimmuneresponse |