Cargando…

MECHANISMS OF RECOVERY FROM A GENERALIZED VIRAL INFECTION: MOUSEPOX : III. REGRESSION OF INFECTIOUS FOCI

Histological and immunofluorescence techniques showed that mononuclear cells invaded virus-infected foci in the livers of passively immunized mice within 10 hr of the receipt of immune spleen cells or hyperimmune serum; by 24 hr, marked destruction of virus antigens had occurred in these lesions. Im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Blanden, R. V.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1971
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2138910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4324301
_version_ 1782143673119539200
author Blanden, R. V.
author_facet Blanden, R. V.
author_sort Blanden, R. V.
collection PubMed
description Histological and immunofluorescence techniques showed that mononuclear cells invaded virus-infected foci in the livers of passively immunized mice within 10 hr of the receipt of immune spleen cells or hyperimmune serum; by 24 hr, marked destruction of virus antigens had occurred in these lesions. Immune cell transfer promoted denser packing of mononuclear cells in the foci and more efficient destruction of infectious material than immune serum. Similar liver lesions developed by the 6th day after sublethal, primary, subcutaneous infection in normal mice. In contrast, in mice with GVHR which were immunosuppressed but possessed hyperactive macrophages and unimpaired splenic interferon response, mononuclear cells did not invade liver lesions and the animals died. These results, together with data reported previously, indicated that mononuclear cell invasion of infected liver foci, triggered by CMI, was of key importance in recovery from primary mousepox. The roles of specifically sensitized lymphocytes and macrophages within lesions were not directly evaluated, but indirect evidence suggested that lymphocytes could cause no more than a halt in virus multiplication, and that macrophages were required for the inactivation of preformed virions. Possible augmentation of the efficiency of macrophages by locally-produced lymphocyte interferon, neutralizing antibody, or stimulation of their phagocytic and intracellular digestive capacity cannot be excluded.
format Text
id pubmed-2138910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1971
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21389102008-04-17 MECHANISMS OF RECOVERY FROM A GENERALIZED VIRAL INFECTION: MOUSEPOX : III. REGRESSION OF INFECTIOUS FOCI Blanden, R. V. J Exp Med Article Histological and immunofluorescence techniques showed that mononuclear cells invaded virus-infected foci in the livers of passively immunized mice within 10 hr of the receipt of immune spleen cells or hyperimmune serum; by 24 hr, marked destruction of virus antigens had occurred in these lesions. Immune cell transfer promoted denser packing of mononuclear cells in the foci and more efficient destruction of infectious material than immune serum. Similar liver lesions developed by the 6th day after sublethal, primary, subcutaneous infection in normal mice. In contrast, in mice with GVHR which were immunosuppressed but possessed hyperactive macrophages and unimpaired splenic interferon response, mononuclear cells did not invade liver lesions and the animals died. These results, together with data reported previously, indicated that mononuclear cell invasion of infected liver foci, triggered by CMI, was of key importance in recovery from primary mousepox. The roles of specifically sensitized lymphocytes and macrophages within lesions were not directly evaluated, but indirect evidence suggested that lymphocytes could cause no more than a halt in virus multiplication, and that macrophages were required for the inactivation of preformed virions. Possible augmentation of the efficiency of macrophages by locally-produced lymphocyte interferon, neutralizing antibody, or stimulation of their phagocytic and intracellular digestive capacity cannot be excluded. The Rockefeller University Press 1971-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2138910/ /pubmed/4324301 Text en Copyright © 1971 by The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Blanden, R. V.
MECHANISMS OF RECOVERY FROM A GENERALIZED VIRAL INFECTION: MOUSEPOX : III. REGRESSION OF INFECTIOUS FOCI
title MECHANISMS OF RECOVERY FROM A GENERALIZED VIRAL INFECTION: MOUSEPOX : III. REGRESSION OF INFECTIOUS FOCI
title_full MECHANISMS OF RECOVERY FROM A GENERALIZED VIRAL INFECTION: MOUSEPOX : III. REGRESSION OF INFECTIOUS FOCI
title_fullStr MECHANISMS OF RECOVERY FROM A GENERALIZED VIRAL INFECTION: MOUSEPOX : III. REGRESSION OF INFECTIOUS FOCI
title_full_unstemmed MECHANISMS OF RECOVERY FROM A GENERALIZED VIRAL INFECTION: MOUSEPOX : III. REGRESSION OF INFECTIOUS FOCI
title_short MECHANISMS OF RECOVERY FROM A GENERALIZED VIRAL INFECTION: MOUSEPOX : III. REGRESSION OF INFECTIOUS FOCI
title_sort mechanisms of recovery from a generalized viral infection: mousepox : iii. regression of infectious foci
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2138910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4324301
work_keys_str_mv AT blandenrv mechanismsofrecoveryfromageneralizedviralinfectionmousepoxiiiregressionofinfectiousfoci