Cargando…

SIGNIFICANCE OF BIVALENCE OF ANTIBODY IN VIRAL NEUTRALIZATION

The role of bivalence of antibody in its capacity to neutralize virus was studied with rabbit antibodies to the bacteriophage, φX174. Univalent Fab or Fab' fragments of IgG isolated from antiviral antisera obtained early in the immunization schedule had virtually no activity compared to that of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenstein, Robert W., Nisonoff, Alfred, Uhr, Jonathan W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1971
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2139105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5166611
_version_ 1782143718597328896
author Rosenstein, Robert W.
Nisonoff, Alfred
Uhr, Jonathan W.
author_facet Rosenstein, Robert W.
Nisonoff, Alfred
Uhr, Jonathan W.
author_sort Rosenstein, Robert W.
collection PubMed
description The role of bivalence of antibody in its capacity to neutralize virus was studied with rabbit antibodies to the bacteriophage, φX174. Univalent Fab or Fab' fragments of IgG isolated from antiviral antisera obtained early in the immunization schedule had virtually no activity compared to that of the intact IgG. When the antibodies were isolated from antisera of the same rabbits several months later, the univalent fragments and IgG were essentially equal in activity. The results are interpreted on the basis that an IgG molecule, because of its bivalence, has a higher effective combining affinity (avidity) than a univalent fragment. After prolonged immunization, however, the affinity of univalent antibody becomes sufficiently high that it exceeds a threshold value, above which further increase in affinity, through bivalence, is no longer significant. The results could explain the variability in relative effectiveness of univalent antibodies observed in previous studies. These data, and the fact that F(ab')(2) fragments from either "early" or "late" antisera were as effective as IgG, indicate that fragment Fc is not a significant factor in neutralization. No differences in dissociation from the virus of univalent antibody from early and late antisera could be demonstrated by dilution at temperatures up to 47°C. The attachment at sites of neutralization on the virus appears to be functionally almost irreversible in this system.
format Text
id pubmed-2139105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1971
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21391052008-04-17 SIGNIFICANCE OF BIVALENCE OF ANTIBODY IN VIRAL NEUTRALIZATION Rosenstein, Robert W. Nisonoff, Alfred Uhr, Jonathan W. J Exp Med Article The role of bivalence of antibody in its capacity to neutralize virus was studied with rabbit antibodies to the bacteriophage, φX174. Univalent Fab or Fab' fragments of IgG isolated from antiviral antisera obtained early in the immunization schedule had virtually no activity compared to that of the intact IgG. When the antibodies were isolated from antisera of the same rabbits several months later, the univalent fragments and IgG were essentially equal in activity. The results are interpreted on the basis that an IgG molecule, because of its bivalence, has a higher effective combining affinity (avidity) than a univalent fragment. After prolonged immunization, however, the affinity of univalent antibody becomes sufficiently high that it exceeds a threshold value, above which further increase in affinity, through bivalence, is no longer significant. The results could explain the variability in relative effectiveness of univalent antibodies observed in previous studies. These data, and the fact that F(ab')(2) fragments from either "early" or "late" antisera were as effective as IgG, indicate that fragment Fc is not a significant factor in neutralization. No differences in dissociation from the virus of univalent antibody from early and late antisera could be demonstrated by dilution at temperatures up to 47°C. The attachment at sites of neutralization on the virus appears to be functionally almost irreversible in this system. The Rockefeller University Press 1971-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2139105/ /pubmed/5166611 Text en Copyright © 1971 by The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rosenstein, Robert W.
Nisonoff, Alfred
Uhr, Jonathan W.
SIGNIFICANCE OF BIVALENCE OF ANTIBODY IN VIRAL NEUTRALIZATION
title SIGNIFICANCE OF BIVALENCE OF ANTIBODY IN VIRAL NEUTRALIZATION
title_full SIGNIFICANCE OF BIVALENCE OF ANTIBODY IN VIRAL NEUTRALIZATION
title_fullStr SIGNIFICANCE OF BIVALENCE OF ANTIBODY IN VIRAL NEUTRALIZATION
title_full_unstemmed SIGNIFICANCE OF BIVALENCE OF ANTIBODY IN VIRAL NEUTRALIZATION
title_short SIGNIFICANCE OF BIVALENCE OF ANTIBODY IN VIRAL NEUTRALIZATION
title_sort significance of bivalence of antibody in viral neutralization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2139105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5166611
work_keys_str_mv AT rosensteinrobertw significanceofbivalenceofantibodyinviralneutralization
AT nisonoffalfred significanceofbivalenceofantibodyinviralneutralization
AT uhrjonathanw significanceofbivalenceofantibodyinviralneutralization