Cargando…

Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population

BACKGROUND: The 12-item Health Survey (SF-12) was developed as a shorter alternative to the SF-36 for use in large-scale studies, particularly when overall physical and mental health are the outcomes of interest instead of the typical eight-scale profile. The main purpose of this study was to assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kontodimopoulos, Nick, Pappa, Evelina, Niakas, Dimitris, Tountas, Yannis
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2140054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17900374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-55
_version_ 1782143921948721152
author Kontodimopoulos, Nick
Pappa, Evelina
Niakas, Dimitris
Tountas, Yannis
author_facet Kontodimopoulos, Nick
Pappa, Evelina
Niakas, Dimitris
Tountas, Yannis
author_sort Kontodimopoulos, Nick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 12-item Health Survey (SF-12) was developed as a shorter alternative to the SF-36 for use in large-scale studies, particularly when overall physical and mental health are the outcomes of interest instead of the typical eight-scale profile. The main purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the Greek version of the SF-12. METHODS: A stratified representative sample (N = 1005) of the Greek general population was interviewed. The survey included the SF-36, the EQ-5D and questions on socio-demographic and health-related characteristics. SF-12 summary scores were derived using the standard US algorithm. Factor analysis was used to confirm the hypothesized component structure of the SF-12 items. Construct validity was investigated with "known groups" validity testing and via convergent and divergent validity, which in turn were assessed by the correlations with the EQ-5D dimensions. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparisons with SF-36 summary scores. RESULTS: SF-12 summary scores distinguished well, and in the expected manner, between groups of respondents on the basis of gender, age, education, socio-economic status, self-reported health problems and health services utilization, thus providing evidence of construct validity. Effect size differences between SF-36 and SF-12 summary scores were generally small (<0.2), supporting concurrent (criterion) validity. Significantly lower mean PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores were observed for respondents reporting chronic conditions compared to those without (P < 0.001). Convergent and divergent validity were supported by expected relationships with the EQ-5D. Reporting a problem in an EQ dimension was associated with lower SF-12 summary scores, supporting concurrent validity. Sensitivity of the Greek SF-12 and replication of the original measurement and conceptual model were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The results provide evidence on the validity of the Greek SF-12 and, in conjunction to future studies addressing test-retest reliability and responsiveness, support its use in Greek health status studies as a brief, yet valid, alternative to the SF-36.
format Text
id pubmed-2140054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21400542007-12-15 Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population Kontodimopoulos, Nick Pappa, Evelina Niakas, Dimitris Tountas, Yannis Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The 12-item Health Survey (SF-12) was developed as a shorter alternative to the SF-36 for use in large-scale studies, particularly when overall physical and mental health are the outcomes of interest instead of the typical eight-scale profile. The main purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the Greek version of the SF-12. METHODS: A stratified representative sample (N = 1005) of the Greek general population was interviewed. The survey included the SF-36, the EQ-5D and questions on socio-demographic and health-related characteristics. SF-12 summary scores were derived using the standard US algorithm. Factor analysis was used to confirm the hypothesized component structure of the SF-12 items. Construct validity was investigated with "known groups" validity testing and via convergent and divergent validity, which in turn were assessed by the correlations with the EQ-5D dimensions. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparisons with SF-36 summary scores. RESULTS: SF-12 summary scores distinguished well, and in the expected manner, between groups of respondents on the basis of gender, age, education, socio-economic status, self-reported health problems and health services utilization, thus providing evidence of construct validity. Effect size differences between SF-36 and SF-12 summary scores were generally small (<0.2), supporting concurrent (criterion) validity. Significantly lower mean PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores were observed for respondents reporting chronic conditions compared to those without (P < 0.001). Convergent and divergent validity were supported by expected relationships with the EQ-5D. Reporting a problem in an EQ dimension was associated with lower SF-12 summary scores, supporting concurrent validity. Sensitivity of the Greek SF-12 and replication of the original measurement and conceptual model were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The results provide evidence on the validity of the Greek SF-12 and, in conjunction to future studies addressing test-retest reliability and responsiveness, support its use in Greek health status studies as a brief, yet valid, alternative to the SF-36. BioMed Central 2007-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2140054/ /pubmed/17900374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-55 Text en Copyright © 2007 Kontodimopoulos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kontodimopoulos, Nick
Pappa, Evelina
Niakas, Dimitris
Tountas, Yannis
Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population
title Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population
title_full Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population
title_fullStr Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population
title_full_unstemmed Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population
title_short Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population
title_sort validity of sf-12 summary scores in a greek general population
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2140054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17900374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-55
work_keys_str_mv AT kontodimopoulosnick validityofsf12summaryscoresinagreekgeneralpopulation
AT pappaevelina validityofsf12summaryscoresinagreekgeneralpopulation
AT niakasdimitris validityofsf12summaryscoresinagreekgeneralpopulation
AT tountasyannis validityofsf12summaryscoresinagreekgeneralpopulation