Cargando…

BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION

Blair's recent theory of excitation is analysed with the following conclusions: 1. The theory is inapplicable to currents of long duration; i.e., slowly increasing currents and the opening excitation. 2. The theory is a modification of the condenser theory of excitation but the modification is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rushton, W. A. H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1934
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19872794
_version_ 1782144180781318144
author Rushton, W. A. H.
author_facet Rushton, W. A. H.
author_sort Rushton, W. A. H.
collection PubMed
description Blair's recent theory of excitation is analysed with the following conclusions: 1. The theory is inapplicable to currents of long duration; i.e., slowly increasing currents and the opening excitation. 2. The theory is a modification of the condenser theory of excitation but the modification is to be rejected on three grounds: (a) The modification has no obvious physical significance. (b) It does not in fact remedy the divergence between calculation and observation. (c) It leads to certain conclusions of a surprising kind which are contrary to observed fact. 3. The qualitative value of the condenser theory is demonstrated by the fairly close agreement between calculation and observation over a considerable field of enquiry.
format Text
id pubmed-2141294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1934
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21412942008-04-23 BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION Rushton, W. A. H. J Gen Physiol Article Blair's recent theory of excitation is analysed with the following conclusions: 1. The theory is inapplicable to currents of long duration; i.e., slowly increasing currents and the opening excitation. 2. The theory is a modification of the condenser theory of excitation but the modification is to be rejected on three grounds: (a) The modification has no obvious physical significance. (b) It does not in fact remedy the divergence between calculation and observation. (c) It leads to certain conclusions of a surprising kind which are contrary to observed fact. 3. The qualitative value of the condenser theory is demonstrated by the fairly close agreement between calculation and observation over a considerable field of enquiry. The Rockefeller University Press 1934-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2141294/ /pubmed/19872794 Text en Copyright © Copyright, 1934, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rushton, W. A. H.
BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION
title BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION
title_full BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION
title_fullStr BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION
title_full_unstemmed BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION
title_short BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION
title_sort blair's "condenser theory" of nerve excitation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19872794
work_keys_str_mv AT rushtonwah blairscondensertheoryofnerveexcitation