Cargando…
BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION
Blair's recent theory of excitation is analysed with the following conclusions: 1. The theory is inapplicable to currents of long duration; i.e., slowly increasing currents and the opening excitation. 2. The theory is a modification of the condenser theory of excitation but the modification is...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
1934
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19872794 |
_version_ | 1782144180781318144 |
---|---|
author | Rushton, W. A. H. |
author_facet | Rushton, W. A. H. |
author_sort | Rushton, W. A. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blair's recent theory of excitation is analysed with the following conclusions: 1. The theory is inapplicable to currents of long duration; i.e., slowly increasing currents and the opening excitation. 2. The theory is a modification of the condenser theory of excitation but the modification is to be rejected on three grounds: (a) The modification has no obvious physical significance. (b) It does not in fact remedy the divergence between calculation and observation. (c) It leads to certain conclusions of a surprising kind which are contrary to observed fact. 3. The qualitative value of the condenser theory is demonstrated by the fairly close agreement between calculation and observation over a considerable field of enquiry. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2141294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1934 |
publisher | The Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21412942008-04-23 BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION Rushton, W. A. H. J Gen Physiol Article Blair's recent theory of excitation is analysed with the following conclusions: 1. The theory is inapplicable to currents of long duration; i.e., slowly increasing currents and the opening excitation. 2. The theory is a modification of the condenser theory of excitation but the modification is to be rejected on three grounds: (a) The modification has no obvious physical significance. (b) It does not in fact remedy the divergence between calculation and observation. (c) It leads to certain conclusions of a surprising kind which are contrary to observed fact. 3. The qualitative value of the condenser theory is demonstrated by the fairly close agreement between calculation and observation over a considerable field of enquiry. The Rockefeller University Press 1934-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2141294/ /pubmed/19872794 Text en Copyright © Copyright, 1934, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rushton, W. A. H. BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION |
title | BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION |
title_full | BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION |
title_fullStr | BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION |
title_full_unstemmed | BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION |
title_short | BLAIR'S "CONDENSER THEORY" OF NERVE EXCITATION |
title_sort | blair's "condenser theory" of nerve excitation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19872794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rushtonwah blairscondensertheoryofnerveexcitation |