Cargando…

THE RELATIONS BETWEEN PREPOTENTIAL, RESTING POTENTIAL, AND LATENT PERIOD IN FROG MUSCLE FIBERS

1. Prepotentials and action potentials were recorded from amphibian striated muscle fibers. Intracellular electrodes were used for stimulating and recording. The resting potential was varied from 55 to 120 mv. by alterations of the KCl concentration of the Ringer's fluid. The magnitude of the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jenerick, Howard Peter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1956
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2147565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13319661
_version_ 1782144469353627648
author Jenerick, Howard Peter
author_facet Jenerick, Howard Peter
author_sort Jenerick, Howard Peter
collection PubMed
description 1. Prepotentials and action potentials were recorded from amphibian striated muscle fibers. Intracellular electrodes were used for stimulating and recording. The resting potential was varied from 55 to 120 mv. by alterations of the KCl concentration of the Ringer's fluid. The magnitude of the prepotential at the initiation of the spike potential was measured and compared to the resting potential and the latent period (time between stimulus "make" and excitation). The magnitude of this prepotential varied with the resting potential. 2. A large prepotential or cathodal depolarization was required to excite a fiber with a high resting potential. If a fiber with a high resting potential fired late (long latency), the adequate prepotential was larger than if the fiber fired early. Fibers with low resting potentials had smaller adequate prepotentials. Also, the adequate prepotential was independent of the latent period, in these depolarized fibers. 3. If the concentration of Ca(++) was increased tenfold, the adequate prepotential of depolarized fibers became strongly dependent upon the latency. 4. Fibers with large or normal resting potentials were prone to respond repetitively during the passage of long duration shock, whereas depolarized and Ca(++)-treated fibers were not. 5. The so-called critical membrane potential (which is defined as the transmembrane potential at the point of excitation) was not independent of the resting potential.
format Text
id pubmed-2147565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1956
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21475652008-04-23 THE RELATIONS BETWEEN PREPOTENTIAL, RESTING POTENTIAL, AND LATENT PERIOD IN FROG MUSCLE FIBERS Jenerick, Howard Peter J Gen Physiol Article 1. Prepotentials and action potentials were recorded from amphibian striated muscle fibers. Intracellular electrodes were used for stimulating and recording. The resting potential was varied from 55 to 120 mv. by alterations of the KCl concentration of the Ringer's fluid. The magnitude of the prepotential at the initiation of the spike potential was measured and compared to the resting potential and the latent period (time between stimulus "make" and excitation). The magnitude of this prepotential varied with the resting potential. 2. A large prepotential or cathodal depolarization was required to excite a fiber with a high resting potential. If a fiber with a high resting potential fired late (long latency), the adequate prepotential was larger than if the fiber fired early. Fibers with low resting potentials had smaller adequate prepotentials. Also, the adequate prepotential was independent of the latent period, in these depolarized fibers. 3. If the concentration of Ca(++) was increased tenfold, the adequate prepotential of depolarized fibers became strongly dependent upon the latency. 4. Fibers with large or normal resting potentials were prone to respond repetitively during the passage of long duration shock, whereas depolarized and Ca(++)-treated fibers were not. 5. The so-called critical membrane potential (which is defined as the transmembrane potential at the point of excitation) was not independent of the resting potential. The Rockefeller University Press 1956-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2147565/ /pubmed/13319661 Text en Copyright © Copyright, 1956, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jenerick, Howard Peter
THE RELATIONS BETWEEN PREPOTENTIAL, RESTING POTENTIAL, AND LATENT PERIOD IN FROG MUSCLE FIBERS
title THE RELATIONS BETWEEN PREPOTENTIAL, RESTING POTENTIAL, AND LATENT PERIOD IN FROG MUSCLE FIBERS
title_full THE RELATIONS BETWEEN PREPOTENTIAL, RESTING POTENTIAL, AND LATENT PERIOD IN FROG MUSCLE FIBERS
title_fullStr THE RELATIONS BETWEEN PREPOTENTIAL, RESTING POTENTIAL, AND LATENT PERIOD IN FROG MUSCLE FIBERS
title_full_unstemmed THE RELATIONS BETWEEN PREPOTENTIAL, RESTING POTENTIAL, AND LATENT PERIOD IN FROG MUSCLE FIBERS
title_short THE RELATIONS BETWEEN PREPOTENTIAL, RESTING POTENTIAL, AND LATENT PERIOD IN FROG MUSCLE FIBERS
title_sort relations between prepotential, resting potential, and latent period in frog muscle fibers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2147565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13319661
work_keys_str_mv AT jenerickhowardpeter therelationsbetweenprepotentialrestingpotentialandlatentperiodinfrogmusclefibers
AT jenerickhowardpeter relationsbetweenprepotentialrestingpotentialandlatentperiodinfrogmusclefibers