Cargando…

Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is a potentially important prognostic factor in breast cancer for identifying patients at high risk of recurrence. This retrospective study assessed two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods measuring uPA antigen levels in 499 primary breast can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouchet, C., Spyratos, F., Hacène, K., Durcos, L., Bécette, V., Oglobine, J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2150205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9652768
_version_ 1782144596189380608
author Bouchet, C.
Spyratos, F.
Hacène, K.
Durcos, L.
Bécette, V.
Oglobine, J.
author_facet Bouchet, C.
Spyratos, F.
Hacène, K.
Durcos, L.
Bécette, V.
Oglobine, J.
author_sort Bouchet, C.
collection PubMed
description Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is a potentially important prognostic factor in breast cancer for identifying patients at high risk of recurrence. This retrospective study assessed two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods measuring uPA antigen levels in 499 primary breast cancer cytosols. Both uPA methods were applied to cytosols used routinely for oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor assays. uPA was determined using a classical ELISA method (Imubind; American Diagnostica) and a novel automatic immunoluminometric assay (Lia; Sangtec Medical). The uPA Imubind method revealed about twice as much uPA antigen (median 0.75 ng mg(-1) protein) as the uPA Lia method (median 0.38 ng mg(-1) protein). The correlation coefficient between the two methods was acceptable (r = 0.81), but the two techniques are not interchangeable. Univariate analyses confirmed the poor outcome of patients whose tumours contained large amounts of uPA, regardless of the technique used. Multivariate analyses showed that uPA Imubind and uPA Lia values were both strong independent prognostic factors.
format Text
id pubmed-2150205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1998
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21502052009-09-10 Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods. Bouchet, C. Spyratos, F. Hacène, K. Durcos, L. Bécette, V. Oglobine, J. Br J Cancer Research Article Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is a potentially important prognostic factor in breast cancer for identifying patients at high risk of recurrence. This retrospective study assessed two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods measuring uPA antigen levels in 499 primary breast cancer cytosols. Both uPA methods were applied to cytosols used routinely for oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor assays. uPA was determined using a classical ELISA method (Imubind; American Diagnostica) and a novel automatic immunoluminometric assay (Lia; Sangtec Medical). The uPA Imubind method revealed about twice as much uPA antigen (median 0.75 ng mg(-1) protein) as the uPA Lia method (median 0.38 ng mg(-1) protein). The correlation coefficient between the two methods was acceptable (r = 0.81), but the two techniques are not interchangeable. Univariate analyses confirmed the poor outcome of patients whose tumours contained large amounts of uPA, regardless of the technique used. Multivariate analyses showed that uPA Imubind and uPA Lia values were both strong independent prognostic factors. Nature Publishing Group 1998-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2150205/ /pubmed/9652768 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bouchet, C.
Spyratos, F.
Hacène, K.
Durcos, L.
Bécette, V.
Oglobine, J.
Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods.
title Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods.
title_full Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods.
title_fullStr Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods.
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods.
title_short Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods.
title_sort prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2150205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9652768
work_keys_str_mv AT bouchetc prognosticvalueofurokinaseplasminogenactivatorinprimarybreastcarcinomacomparisonoftwoimmunoassaymethods
AT spyratosf prognosticvalueofurokinaseplasminogenactivatorinprimarybreastcarcinomacomparisonoftwoimmunoassaymethods
AT hacanek prognosticvalueofurokinaseplasminogenactivatorinprimarybreastcarcinomacomparisonoftwoimmunoassaymethods
AT durcosl prognosticvalueofurokinaseplasminogenactivatorinprimarybreastcarcinomacomparisonoftwoimmunoassaymethods
AT bacettev prognosticvalueofurokinaseplasminogenactivatorinprimarybreastcarcinomacomparisonoftwoimmunoassaymethods
AT oglobinej prognosticvalueofurokinaseplasminogenactivatorinprimarybreastcarcinomacomparisonoftwoimmunoassaymethods