Cargando…

Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI)

The Cancer Vaccine Consortium of the Sabin Vaccine Institute (CVC/SVI) is conducting an ongoing large-scale immune monitoring harmonization program through its members and affiliated associations. This effort was brought to life as an external validation program by conducting an international Elispo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janetzki, Sylvia, Panageas, Katherine S., Ben-Porat, Leah, Boyer, Jean, Britten, Cedrik M., Clay, Timothy M., Kalos, Michael, Maecker, Holden T., Romero, Pedro, Yuan, Jianda, Martin Kast, W., Hoos, Axel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2150634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17721781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00262-007-0380-6
_version_ 1782144637042950144
author Janetzki, Sylvia
Panageas, Katherine S.
Ben-Porat, Leah
Boyer, Jean
Britten, Cedrik M.
Clay, Timothy M.
Kalos, Michael
Maecker, Holden T.
Romero, Pedro
Yuan, Jianda
Martin Kast, W.
Hoos, Axel
author_facet Janetzki, Sylvia
Panageas, Katherine S.
Ben-Porat, Leah
Boyer, Jean
Britten, Cedrik M.
Clay, Timothy M.
Kalos, Michael
Maecker, Holden T.
Romero, Pedro
Yuan, Jianda
Martin Kast, W.
Hoos, Axel
author_sort Janetzki, Sylvia
collection PubMed
description The Cancer Vaccine Consortium of the Sabin Vaccine Institute (CVC/SVI) is conducting an ongoing large-scale immune monitoring harmonization program through its members and affiliated associations. This effort was brought to life as an external validation program by conducting an international Elispot proficiency panel with 36 laboratories in 2005, and was followed by a second panel with 29 participating laboratories in 2006 allowing for application of learnings from the first panel. Critical protocol choices, as well as standardization and validation practices among laboratories were assessed through detailed surveys. Although panel participants had to follow general guidelines in order to allow comparison of results, each laboratory was able to use its own protocols, materials and reagents. The second panel recorded an overall significantly improved performance, as measured by the ability to detect all predefined responses correctly. Protocol choices and laboratory practices, which can have a dramatic effect on the overall assay outcome, were identified and lead to the following recommendations: (A) Establish a laboratory SOP for Elispot testing procedures including (A1) a counting method for apoptotic cells for determining adequate cell dilution for plating, and (A2) overnight rest of cells prior to plating and incubation, (B) Use only pre-tested serum optimized for low background: high signal ratio, (C) Establish a laboratory SOP for plate reading including (C1) human auditing during the reading process and (C2) adequate adjustments for technical artifacts, and (D) Only allow trained personnel, which is certified per laboratory SOPs to conduct assays. Recommendations described under (A) were found to make a statistically significant difference in assay performance, while the remaining recommendations are based on practical experiences confirmed by the panel results, which could not be statistically tested. These results provide initial harmonization guidelines to optimize Elispot assay performance to the immunotherapy community. Further optimization is in process with ongoing panels.
format Text
id pubmed-2150634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21506342007-12-20 Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI) Janetzki, Sylvia Panageas, Katherine S. Ben-Porat, Leah Boyer, Jean Britten, Cedrik M. Clay, Timothy M. Kalos, Michael Maecker, Holden T. Romero, Pedro Yuan, Jianda Martin Kast, W. Hoos, Axel Cancer Immunol Immunother Original Article The Cancer Vaccine Consortium of the Sabin Vaccine Institute (CVC/SVI) is conducting an ongoing large-scale immune monitoring harmonization program through its members and affiliated associations. This effort was brought to life as an external validation program by conducting an international Elispot proficiency panel with 36 laboratories in 2005, and was followed by a second panel with 29 participating laboratories in 2006 allowing for application of learnings from the first panel. Critical protocol choices, as well as standardization and validation practices among laboratories were assessed through detailed surveys. Although panel participants had to follow general guidelines in order to allow comparison of results, each laboratory was able to use its own protocols, materials and reagents. The second panel recorded an overall significantly improved performance, as measured by the ability to detect all predefined responses correctly. Protocol choices and laboratory practices, which can have a dramatic effect on the overall assay outcome, were identified and lead to the following recommendations: (A) Establish a laboratory SOP for Elispot testing procedures including (A1) a counting method for apoptotic cells for determining adequate cell dilution for plating, and (A2) overnight rest of cells prior to plating and incubation, (B) Use only pre-tested serum optimized for low background: high signal ratio, (C) Establish a laboratory SOP for plate reading including (C1) human auditing during the reading process and (C2) adequate adjustments for technical artifacts, and (D) Only allow trained personnel, which is certified per laboratory SOPs to conduct assays. Recommendations described under (A) were found to make a statistically significant difference in assay performance, while the remaining recommendations are based on practical experiences confirmed by the panel results, which could not be statistically tested. These results provide initial harmonization guidelines to optimize Elispot assay performance to the immunotherapy community. Further optimization is in process with ongoing panels. Springer-Verlag 2007-08-25 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2150634/ /pubmed/17721781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00262-007-0380-6 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Janetzki, Sylvia
Panageas, Katherine S.
Ben-Porat, Leah
Boyer, Jean
Britten, Cedrik M.
Clay, Timothy M.
Kalos, Michael
Maecker, Holden T.
Romero, Pedro
Yuan, Jianda
Martin Kast, W.
Hoos, Axel
Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI)
title Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI)
title_full Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI)
title_fullStr Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI)
title_full_unstemmed Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI)
title_short Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI)
title_sort results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international elispot proficiency panels conducted by the cancer vaccine consortium (cvc/svi)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2150634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17721781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00262-007-0380-6
work_keys_str_mv AT janetzkisylvia resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT panageaskatherines resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT benporatleah resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT boyerjean resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT brittencedrikm resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT claytimothym resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT kalosmichael resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT maeckerholdent resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT romeropedro resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT yuanjianda resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT martinkastw resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT hoosaxel resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi
AT resultsandharmonizationguidelinesfromtwolargescaleinternationalelispotproficiencypanelsconductedbythecancervaccineconsortiumcvcsvi