Cargando…
Dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent in an in vivo murine melanoma model
Many factors affect the sensitivity and reliability of tumor vasculature assessment at the small doses of contrast agent necessary for imaging mice. In this study we investigate the dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent for a minimal exposure power Doppler technique (minexPD) in a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
e-Med
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18083651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2007.0031 |
_version_ | 1782144723057639424 |
---|---|
author | Seiler, Gabriela S Ziemer, Lisa S Schultz, Susan Lee, William M.F Sehgal, Chandra M |
author_facet | Seiler, Gabriela S Ziemer, Lisa S Schultz, Susan Lee, William M.F Sehgal, Chandra M |
author_sort | Seiler, Gabriela S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many factors affect the sensitivity and reliability of tumor vasculature assessment at the small doses of contrast agent necessary for imaging mice. In this study we investigate the dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent for a minimal exposure power Doppler technique (minexPD) in a murine melanoma model. K1735 murine melanomas grown in 25 C3H/HeN mice were imaged by power Doppler ultrasound using different doses of contrast agents, Optison® and Definity®. Six mice were treated with an antivascular agent, combretastatin A4-phosphate (CA4P), and imaged before and after treatment. The color-weighted fractional area (CWFA) of the peak-enhanced image was measured to assess tumor perfusion on a relative scale of 0 to 100. CWFA increased logarithmically with dose (R(2)=0.97). Treatment with CA4P resulted in pronounced reduction in tumor perfusion 2 h after contrast injection, but perfusion recovered in the tumor periphery after 2 days. CWFA was significantly different between pre- and post-treatment for all doses at 2 h and 2 days (p < 0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference detectable between the two contrast agents, Optison® and Definity® (p = 0.46). In vivo tumor enhancement in mice increases as logarithmic function with dose. Although the extent of enhancement is dose dependent, the difference between pre- and post-therapy enhancement is relatively unchanged and uniform at varying doses. The two contrast agents tested in this study performed equally well. These results suggest that quantitative contrast-enhanced power Doppler imaging is an effective method for monitoring therapy response of tumors in mice. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2151329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | e-Med |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21513292009-12-17 Dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent in an in vivo murine melanoma model Seiler, Gabriela S Ziemer, Lisa S Schultz, Susan Lee, William M.F Sehgal, Chandra M Cancer Imaging Article Many factors affect the sensitivity and reliability of tumor vasculature assessment at the small doses of contrast agent necessary for imaging mice. In this study we investigate the dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent for a minimal exposure power Doppler technique (minexPD) in a murine melanoma model. K1735 murine melanomas grown in 25 C3H/HeN mice were imaged by power Doppler ultrasound using different doses of contrast agents, Optison® and Definity®. Six mice were treated with an antivascular agent, combretastatin A4-phosphate (CA4P), and imaged before and after treatment. The color-weighted fractional area (CWFA) of the peak-enhanced image was measured to assess tumor perfusion on a relative scale of 0 to 100. CWFA increased logarithmically with dose (R(2)=0.97). Treatment with CA4P resulted in pronounced reduction in tumor perfusion 2 h after contrast injection, but perfusion recovered in the tumor periphery after 2 days. CWFA was significantly different between pre- and post-treatment for all doses at 2 h and 2 days (p < 0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference detectable between the two contrast agents, Optison® and Definity® (p = 0.46). In vivo tumor enhancement in mice increases as logarithmic function with dose. Although the extent of enhancement is dose dependent, the difference between pre- and post-therapy enhancement is relatively unchanged and uniform at varying doses. The two contrast agents tested in this study performed equally well. These results suggest that quantitative contrast-enhanced power Doppler imaging is an effective method for monitoring therapy response of tumors in mice. e-Med 2007-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2151329/ /pubmed/18083651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2007.0031 Text en © 2007 International Cancer Imaging Society |
spellingShingle | Article Seiler, Gabriela S Ziemer, Lisa S Schultz, Susan Lee, William M.F Sehgal, Chandra M Dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent in an in vivo murine melanoma model |
title | Dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent in an in vivo murine melanoma model |
title_full | Dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent in an in vivo murine melanoma model |
title_fullStr | Dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent in an in vivo murine melanoma model |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent in an in vivo murine melanoma model |
title_short | Dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent in an in vivo murine melanoma model |
title_sort | dose–response relationship of ultrasound contrast agent in an in vivo murine melanoma model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18083651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2007.0031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seilergabrielas doseresponserelationshipofultrasoundcontrastagentinaninvivomurinemelanomamodel AT ziemerlisas doseresponserelationshipofultrasoundcontrastagentinaninvivomurinemelanomamodel AT schultzsusan doseresponserelationshipofultrasoundcontrastagentinaninvivomurinemelanomamodel AT leewilliammf doseresponserelationshipofultrasoundcontrastagentinaninvivomurinemelanomamodel AT sehgalchandram doseresponserelationshipofultrasoundcontrastagentinaninvivomurinemelanomamodel |