Cargando…

Accessibility of Targeted DHPR Sites to Streptavidin and Functional Effects of Binding on EC Coupling

In skeletal muscle, the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the plasma membrane (PM) serves as a Ca(2+) channel and as the voltage sensor for excitation–contraction (EC coupling), triggering Ca(2+) release via the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) membrane. In additi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenzon, Nancy M., Beam, Kurt G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17893191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200609730
Descripción
Sumario:In skeletal muscle, the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the plasma membrane (PM) serves as a Ca(2+) channel and as the voltage sensor for excitation–contraction (EC coupling), triggering Ca(2+) release via the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) membrane. In addition to being functionally linked, these two proteins are also structurally linked to one another, but the identity of these links remains unknown. As an approach to address this issue, we have expressed DHPR α(1S) or β(1a) subunits, with a biotin acceptor domain fused to targeted sites, in myotubes null for the corresponding, endogenous DHPR subunit. After saponin permeabilization, the ∼60-kD streptavidin molecule had access to the β(1a) N and C termini and to the α(1S) N terminus and proximal II–III loop (residues 671–686). Steptavidin also had access to these sites after injection into living myotubes. However, sites of the α(1S) C terminus were either inaccessible or conditionally accessible in saponin- permeabilized myotubes, suggesting that these C-terminal regions may exist in conformations that are occluded by other proteins in PM/SR junction (e.g., RyR1). The binding of injected streptavidin to the β(1a) N or C terminus, or to the α(1S) N terminus, had no effect on electrically evoked contractions. By contrast, binding of streptavidin to the proximal α(1S) II–III loop abolished such contractions, without affecting agonist-induced Ca(2+) release via RyR1. Moreover, the block of EC coupling did not appear to result from global distortion of the DHPR and supports the hypothesis that conformational changes of the α(1S) II–III loop are necessary for EC coupling in skeletal muscle.