Cargando…

Physiological Properties of Rod Photoreceptor Cells in Green-sensitive Cone Pigment Knock-in Mice

Rod and cone photoreceptor cells that are responsible for scotopic and photopic vision, respectively, exhibit photoresponses different from each other and contain similar phototransduction proteins with distinctive molecular properties. To investigate the contribution of the different molecular prop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakurai, Keisuke, Onishi, Akishi, Imai, Hiroo, Chisaka, Osamu, Ueda, Yoshiki, Usukura, Jiro, Nakatani, Kei, Shichida, Yoshinori
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2154367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17591985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200609729
_version_ 1782144797501292544
author Sakurai, Keisuke
Onishi, Akishi
Imai, Hiroo
Chisaka, Osamu
Ueda, Yoshiki
Usukura, Jiro
Nakatani, Kei
Shichida, Yoshinori
author_facet Sakurai, Keisuke
Onishi, Akishi
Imai, Hiroo
Chisaka, Osamu
Ueda, Yoshiki
Usukura, Jiro
Nakatani, Kei
Shichida, Yoshinori
author_sort Sakurai, Keisuke
collection PubMed
description Rod and cone photoreceptor cells that are responsible for scotopic and photopic vision, respectively, exhibit photoresponses different from each other and contain similar phototransduction proteins with distinctive molecular properties. To investigate the contribution of the different molecular properties of visual pigments to the responses of the photoreceptor cells, we have generated knock-in mice in which rod visual pigment (rhodopsin) was replaced with mouse green-sensitive cone visual pigment (mouse green). The mouse green was successfully transported to the rod outer segments, though the expression of mouse green in homozygous retina was ∼11% of rhodopsin in wild-type retina. Single-cell recordings of wild-type and homozygous rods suggested that the flash sensitivity and the single-photon responses from mouse green were three to fourfold lower than those from rhodopsin after correction for the differences in cell volume and levels of several signal transduction proteins. Subsequent measurements using heterozygous rods expressing both mouse green and rhodopsin E122Q mutant, where these pigments in the same rod cells can be selectively irradiated due to their distinctive absorption maxima, clearly showed that the photoresponse of mouse green was threefold lower than that of rhodopsin. Noise analysis indicated that the rate of thermal activations of mouse green was 1.7 × 10(−7) s(−1), about 860-fold higher than that of rhodopsin. The increase in thermal activation of mouse green relative to that of rhodopsin results in only 4% reduction of rod photosensitivity for bright lights, but would instead be expected to severely affect the visual threshold under dim-light conditions. Therefore, the abilities of rhodopsin to generate a large single photon response and to retain high thermal stability in darkness are factors that have been necessary for the evolution of scotopic vision.
format Text
id pubmed-2154367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21543672008-01-17 Physiological Properties of Rod Photoreceptor Cells in Green-sensitive Cone Pigment Knock-in Mice Sakurai, Keisuke Onishi, Akishi Imai, Hiroo Chisaka, Osamu Ueda, Yoshiki Usukura, Jiro Nakatani, Kei Shichida, Yoshinori J Gen Physiol Articles Rod and cone photoreceptor cells that are responsible for scotopic and photopic vision, respectively, exhibit photoresponses different from each other and contain similar phototransduction proteins with distinctive molecular properties. To investigate the contribution of the different molecular properties of visual pigments to the responses of the photoreceptor cells, we have generated knock-in mice in which rod visual pigment (rhodopsin) was replaced with mouse green-sensitive cone visual pigment (mouse green). The mouse green was successfully transported to the rod outer segments, though the expression of mouse green in homozygous retina was ∼11% of rhodopsin in wild-type retina. Single-cell recordings of wild-type and homozygous rods suggested that the flash sensitivity and the single-photon responses from mouse green were three to fourfold lower than those from rhodopsin after correction for the differences in cell volume and levels of several signal transduction proteins. Subsequent measurements using heterozygous rods expressing both mouse green and rhodopsin E122Q mutant, where these pigments in the same rod cells can be selectively irradiated due to their distinctive absorption maxima, clearly showed that the photoresponse of mouse green was threefold lower than that of rhodopsin. Noise analysis indicated that the rate of thermal activations of mouse green was 1.7 × 10(−7) s(−1), about 860-fold higher than that of rhodopsin. The increase in thermal activation of mouse green relative to that of rhodopsin results in only 4% reduction of rod photosensitivity for bright lights, but would instead be expected to severely affect the visual threshold under dim-light conditions. Therefore, the abilities of rhodopsin to generate a large single photon response and to retain high thermal stability in darkness are factors that have been necessary for the evolution of scotopic vision. The Rockefeller University Press 2007-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2154367/ /pubmed/17591985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200609729 Text en Copyright © 2007, The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Sakurai, Keisuke
Onishi, Akishi
Imai, Hiroo
Chisaka, Osamu
Ueda, Yoshiki
Usukura, Jiro
Nakatani, Kei
Shichida, Yoshinori
Physiological Properties of Rod Photoreceptor Cells in Green-sensitive Cone Pigment Knock-in Mice
title Physiological Properties of Rod Photoreceptor Cells in Green-sensitive Cone Pigment Knock-in Mice
title_full Physiological Properties of Rod Photoreceptor Cells in Green-sensitive Cone Pigment Knock-in Mice
title_fullStr Physiological Properties of Rod Photoreceptor Cells in Green-sensitive Cone Pigment Knock-in Mice
title_full_unstemmed Physiological Properties of Rod Photoreceptor Cells in Green-sensitive Cone Pigment Knock-in Mice
title_short Physiological Properties of Rod Photoreceptor Cells in Green-sensitive Cone Pigment Knock-in Mice
title_sort physiological properties of rod photoreceptor cells in green-sensitive cone pigment knock-in mice
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2154367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17591985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200609729
work_keys_str_mv AT sakuraikeisuke physiologicalpropertiesofrodphotoreceptorcellsingreensensitiveconepigmentknockinmice
AT onishiakishi physiologicalpropertiesofrodphotoreceptorcellsingreensensitiveconepigmentknockinmice
AT imaihiroo physiologicalpropertiesofrodphotoreceptorcellsingreensensitiveconepigmentknockinmice
AT chisakaosamu physiologicalpropertiesofrodphotoreceptorcellsingreensensitiveconepigmentknockinmice
AT uedayoshiki physiologicalpropertiesofrodphotoreceptorcellsingreensensitiveconepigmentknockinmice
AT usukurajiro physiologicalpropertiesofrodphotoreceptorcellsingreensensitiveconepigmentknockinmice
AT nakatanikei physiologicalpropertiesofrodphotoreceptorcellsingreensensitiveconepigmentknockinmice
AT shichidayoshinori physiologicalpropertiesofrodphotoreceptorcellsingreensensitiveconepigmentknockinmice