Cargando…
Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AIMS: To compare interferon monotherapy with its combination with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive hepatitis B treatment. METHODS: Two independent researchers identified pertinent randomized controlled trials. The trials were evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2156150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17919229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01580.x |
_version_ | 1782144816258220032 |
---|---|
author | Rudin, Dan Shah, Sooraj M Kiss, Alexander Wetz, Robert V Sottile, Vincent M |
author_facet | Rudin, Dan Shah, Sooraj M Kiss, Alexander Wetz, Robert V Sottile, Vincent M |
author_sort | Rudin, Dan |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To compare interferon monotherapy with its combination with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive hepatitis B treatment. METHODS: Two independent researchers identified pertinent randomized controlled trials. The trials were evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneity. Rates of sustained virological and biochemical responses, and HBeAg clearance and seroconversion were used as primary efficacy measures. Quantitative meta-analyses were conducted to assess differences between groups for conventional and pegylated interferon, and overall. RESULTS: Greater sustained virological, biochemical and seroconversion rates were observed with addition of lamivudine to conventional [odds ratio (OR)=3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.7–5.5), P<0.0001, OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.2–2.7), P=0.007 and OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.1–2.8), P=0.01 respectively], although not pegylated [OR=1.1, 95% CI (0.5–2.3), P=0.8, OR=1.0, 95% CI (0.7–1.3), P=0.94, and OR=0.9, 95% CI (0.6–1.2), P=0.34 respectively] interferon-α, with no significant affect on HBeAg clearance rates [OR=1.6, 95% CI (0.9–2.7), P=0.09, and OR=0.8, 95% CI (0.6–1.1), P=0.26 respectively]. Excluding virological response (P<0.001), pegylated interferon monotherapy and conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy were similarly efficacious (P>0.05), with the former studied in harder to treat patients, as evidenced by the superior virological response observed with conventional as compared with pegylated interferon monotherapy (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In comparable populations, pegylated interferon monotherapy is likely to be equally or more efficacious than conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy, thus constituting the treatment of choice, with no added benefit with lamivudine addition. However, when conventional interferon is used, its combination with lamivudine should be considered. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2156150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21561502008-01-03 Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Rudin, Dan Shah, Sooraj M Kiss, Alexander Wetz, Robert V Sottile, Vincent M Liver Int Clinical Studies AIMS: To compare interferon monotherapy with its combination with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive hepatitis B treatment. METHODS: Two independent researchers identified pertinent randomized controlled trials. The trials were evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneity. Rates of sustained virological and biochemical responses, and HBeAg clearance and seroconversion were used as primary efficacy measures. Quantitative meta-analyses were conducted to assess differences between groups for conventional and pegylated interferon, and overall. RESULTS: Greater sustained virological, biochemical and seroconversion rates were observed with addition of lamivudine to conventional [odds ratio (OR)=3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.7–5.5), P<0.0001, OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.2–2.7), P=0.007 and OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.1–2.8), P=0.01 respectively], although not pegylated [OR=1.1, 95% CI (0.5–2.3), P=0.8, OR=1.0, 95% CI (0.7–1.3), P=0.94, and OR=0.9, 95% CI (0.6–1.2), P=0.34 respectively] interferon-α, with no significant affect on HBeAg clearance rates [OR=1.6, 95% CI (0.9–2.7), P=0.09, and OR=0.8, 95% CI (0.6–1.1), P=0.26 respectively]. Excluding virological response (P<0.001), pegylated interferon monotherapy and conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy were similarly efficacious (P>0.05), with the former studied in harder to treat patients, as evidenced by the superior virological response observed with conventional as compared with pegylated interferon monotherapy (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In comparable populations, pegylated interferon monotherapy is likely to be equally or more efficacious than conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy, thus constituting the treatment of choice, with no added benefit with lamivudine addition. However, when conventional interferon is used, its combination with lamivudine should be considered. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2156150/ /pubmed/17919229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01580.x Text en © 2007 The Author. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Studies Rudin, Dan Shah, Sooraj M Kiss, Alexander Wetz, Robert V Sottile, Vincent M Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis b e antigen-positive hepatitis b treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Clinical Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2156150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17919229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01580.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudindan interferonandlamivudinevsinterferonforhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbtreatmentmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shahsoorajm interferonandlamivudinevsinterferonforhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbtreatmentmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kissalexander interferonandlamivudinevsinterferonforhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbtreatmentmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wetzrobertv interferonandlamivudinevsinterferonforhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbtreatmentmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sottilevincentm interferonandlamivudinevsinterferonforhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbtreatmentmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |