Cargando…

Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS: To compare interferon monotherapy with its combination with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive hepatitis B treatment. METHODS: Two independent researchers identified pertinent randomized controlled trials. The trials were evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudin, Dan, Shah, Sooraj M, Kiss, Alexander, Wetz, Robert V, Sottile, Vincent M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2156150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17919229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01580.x
_version_ 1782144816258220032
author Rudin, Dan
Shah, Sooraj M
Kiss, Alexander
Wetz, Robert V
Sottile, Vincent M
author_facet Rudin, Dan
Shah, Sooraj M
Kiss, Alexander
Wetz, Robert V
Sottile, Vincent M
author_sort Rudin, Dan
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To compare interferon monotherapy with its combination with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive hepatitis B treatment. METHODS: Two independent researchers identified pertinent randomized controlled trials. The trials were evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneity. Rates of sustained virological and biochemical responses, and HBeAg clearance and seroconversion were used as primary efficacy measures. Quantitative meta-analyses were conducted to assess differences between groups for conventional and pegylated interferon, and overall. RESULTS: Greater sustained virological, biochemical and seroconversion rates were observed with addition of lamivudine to conventional [odds ratio (OR)=3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.7–5.5), P<0.0001, OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.2–2.7), P=0.007 and OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.1–2.8), P=0.01 respectively], although not pegylated [OR=1.1, 95% CI (0.5–2.3), P=0.8, OR=1.0, 95% CI (0.7–1.3), P=0.94, and OR=0.9, 95% CI (0.6–1.2), P=0.34 respectively] interferon-α, with no significant affect on HBeAg clearance rates [OR=1.6, 95% CI (0.9–2.7), P=0.09, and OR=0.8, 95% CI (0.6–1.1), P=0.26 respectively]. Excluding virological response (P<0.001), pegylated interferon monotherapy and conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy were similarly efficacious (P>0.05), with the former studied in harder to treat patients, as evidenced by the superior virological response observed with conventional as compared with pegylated interferon monotherapy (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In comparable populations, pegylated interferon monotherapy is likely to be equally or more efficacious than conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy, thus constituting the treatment of choice, with no added benefit with lamivudine addition. However, when conventional interferon is used, its combination with lamivudine should be considered.
format Text
id pubmed-2156150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21561502008-01-03 Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Rudin, Dan Shah, Sooraj M Kiss, Alexander Wetz, Robert V Sottile, Vincent M Liver Int Clinical Studies AIMS: To compare interferon monotherapy with its combination with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive hepatitis B treatment. METHODS: Two independent researchers identified pertinent randomized controlled trials. The trials were evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneity. Rates of sustained virological and biochemical responses, and HBeAg clearance and seroconversion were used as primary efficacy measures. Quantitative meta-analyses were conducted to assess differences between groups for conventional and pegylated interferon, and overall. RESULTS: Greater sustained virological, biochemical and seroconversion rates were observed with addition of lamivudine to conventional [odds ratio (OR)=3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.7–5.5), P<0.0001, OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.2–2.7), P=0.007 and OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.1–2.8), P=0.01 respectively], although not pegylated [OR=1.1, 95% CI (0.5–2.3), P=0.8, OR=1.0, 95% CI (0.7–1.3), P=0.94, and OR=0.9, 95% CI (0.6–1.2), P=0.34 respectively] interferon-α, with no significant affect on HBeAg clearance rates [OR=1.6, 95% CI (0.9–2.7), P=0.09, and OR=0.8, 95% CI (0.6–1.1), P=0.26 respectively]. Excluding virological response (P<0.001), pegylated interferon monotherapy and conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy were similarly efficacious (P>0.05), with the former studied in harder to treat patients, as evidenced by the superior virological response observed with conventional as compared with pegylated interferon monotherapy (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In comparable populations, pegylated interferon monotherapy is likely to be equally or more efficacious than conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy, thus constituting the treatment of choice, with no added benefit with lamivudine addition. However, when conventional interferon is used, its combination with lamivudine should be considered. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2156150/ /pubmed/17919229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01580.x Text en © 2007 The Author. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Clinical Studies
Rudin, Dan
Shah, Sooraj M
Kiss, Alexander
Wetz, Robert V
Sottile, Vincent M
Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis b e antigen-positive hepatitis b treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2156150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17919229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01580.x
work_keys_str_mv AT rudindan interferonandlamivudinevsinterferonforhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbtreatmentmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shahsoorajm interferonandlamivudinevsinterferonforhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbtreatmentmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kissalexander interferonandlamivudinevsinterferonforhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbtreatmentmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wetzrobertv interferonandlamivudinevsinterferonforhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbtreatmentmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sottilevincentm interferonandlamivudinevsinterferonforhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbtreatmentmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials