Cargando…

Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine

BACKGROUND: Movement control dysfunction [MCD] reduces active control of movements. Patients with MCD might form an important subgroup among patients with non specific low back pain. The diagnosis is based on the observation of active movements. Although widely used clinically, only a few studies ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luomajoki, Hannu, Kool, Jan, de Bruin, Eling D, Airaksinen, Olavi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2164955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17850669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-90
_version_ 1782144833185382400
author Luomajoki, Hannu
Kool, Jan
de Bruin, Eling D
Airaksinen, Olavi
author_facet Luomajoki, Hannu
Kool, Jan
de Bruin, Eling D
Airaksinen, Olavi
author_sort Luomajoki, Hannu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Movement control dysfunction [MCD] reduces active control of movements. Patients with MCD might form an important subgroup among patients with non specific low back pain. The diagnosis is based on the observation of active movements. Although widely used clinically, only a few studies have been performed to determine the test reliability. The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of movement control dysfunction tests of the lumbar spine. METHODS: We videoed patients performing a standardized test battery consisting of 10 active movement tests for motor control in 27 patients with non specific low back pain and 13 patients with other diagnoses but without back pain. Four physiotherapists independently rated test performances as correct or incorrect per observation, blinded to all other patient information and to each other. The study was conducted in a private physiotherapy outpatient practice in Reinach, Switzerland. Kappa coefficients, percentage agreements and confidence intervals for inter- and intra-rater results were calculated. RESULTS: The kappa values for inter-tester reliability ranged between 0.24 – 0.71. Six tests out of ten showed a substantial reliability [k > 0.6]. Intra-tester reliability was between 0.51 – 0.96, all tests but one showed substantial reliability [k > 0.6]. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists were able to reliably rate most of the tests in this series of motor control tasks as being performed correctly or not, by viewing films of patients with and without back pain performing the task.
format Text
id pubmed-2164955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21649552007-12-28 Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine Luomajoki, Hannu Kool, Jan de Bruin, Eling D Airaksinen, Olavi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Movement control dysfunction [MCD] reduces active control of movements. Patients with MCD might form an important subgroup among patients with non specific low back pain. The diagnosis is based on the observation of active movements. Although widely used clinically, only a few studies have been performed to determine the test reliability. The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of movement control dysfunction tests of the lumbar spine. METHODS: We videoed patients performing a standardized test battery consisting of 10 active movement tests for motor control in 27 patients with non specific low back pain and 13 patients with other diagnoses but without back pain. Four physiotherapists independently rated test performances as correct or incorrect per observation, blinded to all other patient information and to each other. The study was conducted in a private physiotherapy outpatient practice in Reinach, Switzerland. Kappa coefficients, percentage agreements and confidence intervals for inter- and intra-rater results were calculated. RESULTS: The kappa values for inter-tester reliability ranged between 0.24 – 0.71. Six tests out of ten showed a substantial reliability [k > 0.6]. Intra-tester reliability was between 0.51 – 0.96, all tests but one showed substantial reliability [k > 0.6]. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists were able to reliably rate most of the tests in this series of motor control tasks as being performed correctly or not, by viewing films of patients with and without back pain performing the task. BioMed Central 2007-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2164955/ /pubmed/17850669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-90 Text en Copyright © 2007 Luomajoki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Luomajoki, Hannu
Kool, Jan
de Bruin, Eling D
Airaksinen, Olavi
Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine
title Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine
title_full Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine
title_fullStr Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine
title_short Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine
title_sort reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2164955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17850669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-90
work_keys_str_mv AT luomajokihannu reliabilityofmovementcontroltestsinthelumbarspine
AT kooljan reliabilityofmovementcontroltestsinthelumbarspine
AT debruinelingd reliabilityofmovementcontroltestsinthelumbarspine
AT airaksinenolavi reliabilityofmovementcontroltestsinthelumbarspine