Cargando…

Avian influenza and poultry workers, Peru, 2006

Background  Currently numerous countries in Asia, Africa and Europe are encountering highly pathogenic avian influenza (AI) infections in poultry and humans. In the Americas, home of the world’s largest poultry exporters, contingency plans are being developed and evaluated in preparation for the arr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortiz, Ernesto J., Kochel, Tadeusz J., Capuano, Ana W., Setterquist, Sharon F., Gray, Gregory C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2168588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18167521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2007.00009.x
_version_ 1782144847175483392
author Ortiz, Ernesto J.
Kochel, Tadeusz J.
Capuano, Ana W.
Setterquist, Sharon F.
Gray, Gregory C.
author_facet Ortiz, Ernesto J.
Kochel, Tadeusz J.
Capuano, Ana W.
Setterquist, Sharon F.
Gray, Gregory C.
author_sort Ortiz, Ernesto J.
collection PubMed
description Background  Currently numerous countries in Asia, Africa and Europe are encountering highly pathogenic avian influenza (AI) infections in poultry and humans. In the Americas, home of the world’s largest poultry exporters, contingency plans are being developed and evaluated in preparation for the arrival of these viral strains. Objectives  With this cross‐sectional study, to our knowledge the first in its kind in Central or South America, we sought to learn whether Peruvian poultry workers had evidence of previous AI infection and if so, to determine the risk factors for infection. Methods  We performed a cross‐sectional seroprevalence study among 149 workers on a Peruvian poultry farm (132 exposed to poultry and 17 non‐exposed controls), serum samples were tested for human influenza virus exposure using a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. Microneutralization assays were performed on all serum samples to detect antibodies against prototypic AI strains H4 through H12. Results  Using multivariate proportional odds modeling we found that the prevalence of elevated titers against AI viruses was low in both groups, exposed and non‐exposed controls. Conclusions  No evidence of previous AI infection among Peruvian poultry workers was found in this first cross‐sectional study performed in South America. This first occupational study of AI in Latin America was encouraging, but it likely reflects the sector of poultry production with higher biosecurity.
format Text
id pubmed-2168588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21685882007-12-28 Avian influenza and poultry workers, Peru, 2006 Ortiz, Ernesto J. Kochel, Tadeusz J. Capuano, Ana W. Setterquist, Sharon F. Gray, Gregory C. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles Background  Currently numerous countries in Asia, Africa and Europe are encountering highly pathogenic avian influenza (AI) infections in poultry and humans. In the Americas, home of the world’s largest poultry exporters, contingency plans are being developed and evaluated in preparation for the arrival of these viral strains. Objectives  With this cross‐sectional study, to our knowledge the first in its kind in Central or South America, we sought to learn whether Peruvian poultry workers had evidence of previous AI infection and if so, to determine the risk factors for infection. Methods  We performed a cross‐sectional seroprevalence study among 149 workers on a Peruvian poultry farm (132 exposed to poultry and 17 non‐exposed controls), serum samples were tested for human influenza virus exposure using a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. Microneutralization assays were performed on all serum samples to detect antibodies against prototypic AI strains H4 through H12. Results  Using multivariate proportional odds modeling we found that the prevalence of elevated titers against AI viruses was low in both groups, exposed and non‐exposed controls. Conclusions  No evidence of previous AI infection among Peruvian poultry workers was found in this first cross‐sectional study performed in South America. This first occupational study of AI in Latin America was encouraging, but it likely reflects the sector of poultry production with higher biosecurity. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007-05-25 2007-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2168588/ /pubmed/18167521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2007.00009.x Text en
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ortiz, Ernesto J.
Kochel, Tadeusz J.
Capuano, Ana W.
Setterquist, Sharon F.
Gray, Gregory C.
Avian influenza and poultry workers, Peru, 2006
title Avian influenza and poultry workers, Peru, 2006
title_full Avian influenza and poultry workers, Peru, 2006
title_fullStr Avian influenza and poultry workers, Peru, 2006
title_full_unstemmed Avian influenza and poultry workers, Peru, 2006
title_short Avian influenza and poultry workers, Peru, 2006
title_sort avian influenza and poultry workers, peru, 2006
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2168588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18167521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2007.00009.x
work_keys_str_mv AT ortizernestoj avianinfluenzaandpoultryworkersperu2006
AT kocheltadeuszj avianinfluenzaandpoultryworkersperu2006
AT capuanoanaw avianinfluenzaandpoultryworkersperu2006
AT setterquistsharonf avianinfluenzaandpoultryworkersperu2006
AT graygregoryc avianinfluenzaandpoultryworkersperu2006