Cargando…
VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The standard care in patients with a painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is conservative therapy. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV), a minimally invasive technique, is gaining popularity as a new treatment option. Many prospective and retrospective studies have repor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2169262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17973983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-33 |
_version_ | 1782144860343500800 |
---|---|
author | Klazen, CAH Verhaar, HJJ Lampmann, LEH Juttmann, JR Blonk, MC Jansen, FH Tielbeek, AV Schoemaker, MC Buskens, E van der Graaf, Y Janssens, X Fransen, H van Everdingen, KJ Muller, AF Mali, WPThM Lohle, PNM |
author_facet | Klazen, CAH Verhaar, HJJ Lampmann, LEH Juttmann, JR Blonk, MC Jansen, FH Tielbeek, AV Schoemaker, MC Buskens, E van der Graaf, Y Janssens, X Fransen, H van Everdingen, KJ Muller, AF Mali, WPThM Lohle, PNM |
author_sort | Klazen, CAH |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The standard care in patients with a painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is conservative therapy. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV), a minimally invasive technique, is gaining popularity as a new treatment option. Many prospective and retrospective studies have reported on the effectiveness and safety of PV, but no large randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been published. OBJECTIVE: To estimate cost-effectiveness of PV compared to conservative therapy in terms of: pain reduction, quality of life, complications, secondary fractures and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VERTOS II study is designed as a prospective, multicenter RCT. Patients with a painful VCF with bone edema on MR imaging, local back pain for 6 weeks or less, osteopenia and aged 50 years or older, after obtaining informed consent are included and randomized for PV or conservative therapy. In total 200 patients will be enrolled. Follow-up is at regular intervals during a 1-year period with standard questionnaires, addressing: clinical symptoms, pain medication, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Secondary fractures, necessary additional therapies and complications are recorded. CONCLUSION: The VERTOS II study is the first methodologically sound RCT designed to assess the cost-effectiveness of PV compared to conservative therapy in patients with an acute osteoporotic VCF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: , NCT00232466 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2169262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21692622007-12-29 VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial Klazen, CAH Verhaar, HJJ Lampmann, LEH Juttmann, JR Blonk, MC Jansen, FH Tielbeek, AV Schoemaker, MC Buskens, E van der Graaf, Y Janssens, X Fransen, H van Everdingen, KJ Muller, AF Mali, WPThM Lohle, PNM Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The standard care in patients with a painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is conservative therapy. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV), a minimally invasive technique, is gaining popularity as a new treatment option. Many prospective and retrospective studies have reported on the effectiveness and safety of PV, but no large randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been published. OBJECTIVE: To estimate cost-effectiveness of PV compared to conservative therapy in terms of: pain reduction, quality of life, complications, secondary fractures and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VERTOS II study is designed as a prospective, multicenter RCT. Patients with a painful VCF with bone edema on MR imaging, local back pain for 6 weeks or less, osteopenia and aged 50 years or older, after obtaining informed consent are included and randomized for PV or conservative therapy. In total 200 patients will be enrolled. Follow-up is at regular intervals during a 1-year period with standard questionnaires, addressing: clinical symptoms, pain medication, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Secondary fractures, necessary additional therapies and complications are recorded. CONCLUSION: The VERTOS II study is the first methodologically sound RCT designed to assess the cost-effectiveness of PV compared to conservative therapy in patients with an acute osteoporotic VCF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: , NCT00232466 BioMed Central 2007-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2169262/ /pubmed/17973983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-33 Text en Copyright © 2007 Klazen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Klazen, CAH Verhaar, HJJ Lampmann, LEH Juttmann, JR Blonk, MC Jansen, FH Tielbeek, AV Schoemaker, MC Buskens, E van der Graaf, Y Janssens, X Fransen, H van Everdingen, KJ Muller, AF Mali, WPThM Lohle, PNM VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title | VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_full | VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_short | VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | vertos ii: percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2169262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17973983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-33 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klazencah vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT verhaarhjj vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lampmannleh vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT juttmannjr vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT blonkmc vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jansenfh vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tielbeekav vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schoemakermc vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT buskense vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandergraafy vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT janssensx vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fransenh vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vaneverdingenkj vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mulleraf vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maliwpthm vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lohlepnm vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |