Cargando…

VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The standard care in patients with a painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is conservative therapy. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV), a minimally invasive technique, is gaining popularity as a new treatment option. Many prospective and retrospective studies have repor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klazen, CAH, Verhaar, HJJ, Lampmann, LEH, Juttmann, JR, Blonk, MC, Jansen, FH, Tielbeek, AV, Schoemaker, MC, Buskens, E, van der Graaf, Y, Janssens, X, Fransen, H, van Everdingen, KJ, Muller, AF, Mali, WPThM, Lohle, PNM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2169262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17973983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-33
_version_ 1782144860343500800
author Klazen, CAH
Verhaar, HJJ
Lampmann, LEH
Juttmann, JR
Blonk, MC
Jansen, FH
Tielbeek, AV
Schoemaker, MC
Buskens, E
van der Graaf, Y
Janssens, X
Fransen, H
van Everdingen, KJ
Muller, AF
Mali, WPThM
Lohle, PNM
author_facet Klazen, CAH
Verhaar, HJJ
Lampmann, LEH
Juttmann, JR
Blonk, MC
Jansen, FH
Tielbeek, AV
Schoemaker, MC
Buskens, E
van der Graaf, Y
Janssens, X
Fransen, H
van Everdingen, KJ
Muller, AF
Mali, WPThM
Lohle, PNM
author_sort Klazen, CAH
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The standard care in patients with a painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is conservative therapy. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV), a minimally invasive technique, is gaining popularity as a new treatment option. Many prospective and retrospective studies have reported on the effectiveness and safety of PV, but no large randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been published. OBJECTIVE: To estimate cost-effectiveness of PV compared to conservative therapy in terms of: pain reduction, quality of life, complications, secondary fractures and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VERTOS II study is designed as a prospective, multicenter RCT. Patients with a painful VCF with bone edema on MR imaging, local back pain for 6 weeks or less, osteopenia and aged 50 years or older, after obtaining informed consent are included and randomized for PV or conservative therapy. In total 200 patients will be enrolled. Follow-up is at regular intervals during a 1-year period with standard questionnaires, addressing: clinical symptoms, pain medication, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Secondary fractures, necessary additional therapies and complications are recorded. CONCLUSION: The VERTOS II study is the first methodologically sound RCT designed to assess the cost-effectiveness of PV compared to conservative therapy in patients with an acute osteoporotic VCF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: , NCT00232466
format Text
id pubmed-2169262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21692622007-12-29 VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial Klazen, CAH Verhaar, HJJ Lampmann, LEH Juttmann, JR Blonk, MC Jansen, FH Tielbeek, AV Schoemaker, MC Buskens, E van der Graaf, Y Janssens, X Fransen, H van Everdingen, KJ Muller, AF Mali, WPThM Lohle, PNM Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The standard care in patients with a painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is conservative therapy. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV), a minimally invasive technique, is gaining popularity as a new treatment option. Many prospective and retrospective studies have reported on the effectiveness and safety of PV, but no large randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been published. OBJECTIVE: To estimate cost-effectiveness of PV compared to conservative therapy in terms of: pain reduction, quality of life, complications, secondary fractures and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VERTOS II study is designed as a prospective, multicenter RCT. Patients with a painful VCF with bone edema on MR imaging, local back pain for 6 weeks or less, osteopenia and aged 50 years or older, after obtaining informed consent are included and randomized for PV or conservative therapy. In total 200 patients will be enrolled. Follow-up is at regular intervals during a 1-year period with standard questionnaires, addressing: clinical symptoms, pain medication, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Secondary fractures, necessary additional therapies and complications are recorded. CONCLUSION: The VERTOS II study is the first methodologically sound RCT designed to assess the cost-effectiveness of PV compared to conservative therapy in patients with an acute osteoporotic VCF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: , NCT00232466 BioMed Central 2007-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2169262/ /pubmed/17973983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-33 Text en Copyright © 2007 Klazen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Klazen, CAH
Verhaar, HJJ
Lampmann, LEH
Juttmann, JR
Blonk, MC
Jansen, FH
Tielbeek, AV
Schoemaker, MC
Buskens, E
van der Graaf, Y
Janssens, X
Fransen, H
van Everdingen, KJ
Muller, AF
Mali, WPThM
Lohle, PNM
VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_short VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_sort vertos ii: percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2169262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17973983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-33
work_keys_str_mv AT klazencah vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT verhaarhjj vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lampmannleh vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT juttmannjr vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT blonkmc vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jansenfh vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tielbeekav vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schoemakermc vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT buskense vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandergraafy vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT janssensx vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fransenh vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vaneverdingenkj vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mulleraf vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maliwpthm vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lohlepnm vertosiipercutaneousvertebroplastyversusconservativetherapyinpatientswithpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesrationaleobjectivesanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial