Cargando…

Regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. A case control study with 10 years follow up

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of the axilla in breast cancer used to be an axillary lymph node dissection. An axillary lymph node dissection is known to give substantial risks of morbidity. In recent years the sentinel node biopsy has become common practice. Future randomized study results will...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spruit, Patty H, Siesling, Sabine, Elferink, Marloes AG, Vonk, Ernest JA, Hoekstra, Carel JM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2173900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17971196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-2-40
_version_ 1782145269528264704
author Spruit, Patty H
Siesling, Sabine
Elferink, Marloes AG
Vonk, Ernest JA
Hoekstra, Carel JM
author_facet Spruit, Patty H
Siesling, Sabine
Elferink, Marloes AG
Vonk, Ernest JA
Hoekstra, Carel JM
author_sort Spruit, Patty H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of the axilla in breast cancer used to be an axillary lymph node dissection. An axillary lymph node dissection is known to give substantial risks of morbidity. In recent years the sentinel node biopsy has become common practice. Future randomized study results will determine whether the expected decrease in morbidity can be proven. METHODS: Before the introduction of the sentinel node biopsy, we conducted a study in which 180 women of 50 years and older with T1/T2 cN0 breast cancer were treated with breast conserving therapy. Instead of an axillary lymph node dissection regional radiotherapy was given in combination with tamoxifen (RT-group). The study group was compared with 341 patients, with the same patient and tumour characteristics, treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (S-group). RESULTS: The treatment groups were comparable, except for age. The RT-group was significantly older than the S-group. The median follow up was 7.2 years. The regional relapse rates were low and equal in both treatment groups, 1.1% in RT-group versus 1.5% in S-group at 5 years. The overall survival was similar; the disease free survival was significant better in the RT-group. CONCLUSION: Regional recurrence rates after regional radiotherapy are very low and equal to an axillary lymphnode dissection.
format Text
id pubmed-2173900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21739002008-01-03 Regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. A case control study with 10 years follow up Spruit, Patty H Siesling, Sabine Elferink, Marloes AG Vonk, Ernest JA Hoekstra, Carel JM Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of the axilla in breast cancer used to be an axillary lymph node dissection. An axillary lymph node dissection is known to give substantial risks of morbidity. In recent years the sentinel node biopsy has become common practice. Future randomized study results will determine whether the expected decrease in morbidity can be proven. METHODS: Before the introduction of the sentinel node biopsy, we conducted a study in which 180 women of 50 years and older with T1/T2 cN0 breast cancer were treated with breast conserving therapy. Instead of an axillary lymph node dissection regional radiotherapy was given in combination with tamoxifen (RT-group). The study group was compared with 341 patients, with the same patient and tumour characteristics, treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (S-group). RESULTS: The treatment groups were comparable, except for age. The RT-group was significantly older than the S-group. The median follow up was 7.2 years. The regional relapse rates were low and equal in both treatment groups, 1.1% in RT-group versus 1.5% in S-group at 5 years. The overall survival was similar; the disease free survival was significant better in the RT-group. CONCLUSION: Regional recurrence rates after regional radiotherapy are very low and equal to an axillary lymphnode dissection. BioMed Central 2007-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2173900/ /pubmed/17971196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-2-40 Text en Copyright © 2007 Spruit et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Spruit, Patty H
Siesling, Sabine
Elferink, Marloes AG
Vonk, Ernest JA
Hoekstra, Carel JM
Regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. A case control study with 10 years follow up
title Regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. A case control study with 10 years follow up
title_full Regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. A case control study with 10 years follow up
title_fullStr Regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. A case control study with 10 years follow up
title_full_unstemmed Regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. A case control study with 10 years follow up
title_short Regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. A case control study with 10 years follow up
title_sort regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. a case control study with 10 years follow up
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2173900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17971196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-2-40
work_keys_str_mv AT spruitpattyh regionalradiotherapyversusanaxillarylymphnodedissectionafterlumpectomyasafealternativeforanaxillarylymphnodedissectioninaclinicallyuninvolvedaxillainbreastcanceracasecontrolstudywith10yearsfollowup
AT sieslingsabine regionalradiotherapyversusanaxillarylymphnodedissectionafterlumpectomyasafealternativeforanaxillarylymphnodedissectioninaclinicallyuninvolvedaxillainbreastcanceracasecontrolstudywith10yearsfollowup
AT elferinkmarloesag regionalradiotherapyversusanaxillarylymphnodedissectionafterlumpectomyasafealternativeforanaxillarylymphnodedissectioninaclinicallyuninvolvedaxillainbreastcanceracasecontrolstudywith10yearsfollowup
AT vonkernestja regionalradiotherapyversusanaxillarylymphnodedissectionafterlumpectomyasafealternativeforanaxillarylymphnodedissectioninaclinicallyuninvolvedaxillainbreastcanceracasecontrolstudywith10yearsfollowup
AT hoekstracareljm regionalradiotherapyversusanaxillarylymphnodedissectionafterlumpectomyasafealternativeforanaxillarylymphnodedissectioninaclinicallyuninvolvedaxillainbreastcanceracasecontrolstudywith10yearsfollowup