Cargando…

Comparative gene expression profiling in two congenic mouse strains following Bordetella pertussis infection

BACKGROUND: Susceptibility to Bordetella pertussis infection varies widely. These differences can partly be explained by genetic host factors. HcB-28 mice are more resistant to B. pertussis infection than C3H mice, which could partially be ascribed to the B. pertussis susceptibility locus-1 (Bps1) o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banus, Sander, Vandebriel, Rob J, Pennings, Jeroen LA, Gremmer, Eric R, Wester, Piet W, van Kranen, Henk J, Breit, Timo M, Demant, Peter, Mooi, Frits R, Hoebee, Barbara, Kimman, Tjeerd G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2174938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17935610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-88
_version_ 1782145392774742016
author Banus, Sander
Vandebriel, Rob J
Pennings, Jeroen LA
Gremmer, Eric R
Wester, Piet W
van Kranen, Henk J
Breit, Timo M
Demant, Peter
Mooi, Frits R
Hoebee, Barbara
Kimman, Tjeerd G
author_facet Banus, Sander
Vandebriel, Rob J
Pennings, Jeroen LA
Gremmer, Eric R
Wester, Piet W
van Kranen, Henk J
Breit, Timo M
Demant, Peter
Mooi, Frits R
Hoebee, Barbara
Kimman, Tjeerd G
author_sort Banus, Sander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Susceptibility to Bordetella pertussis infection varies widely. These differences can partly be explained by genetic host factors. HcB-28 mice are more resistant to B. pertussis infection than C3H mice, which could partially be ascribed to the B. pertussis susceptibility locus-1 (Bps1) on chromosome 12. The presence of C57BL/10 genome on this locus instead of C3H genome resulted in a decreased number of bacteria in the lung. To further elucidate the role of host genetic factors, in particular in the Bps1 locus, in B. pertussis infection, and to identify candidate genes within in this region, we compared expression profiles in the lungs of the C3H and HcB-28 mouse strains following B. pertussis inoculation. Twelve and a half percent of the genomes of these mice are from a different genetic background. RESULTS: Upon B. pertussis inoculation 2,353 genes were differentially expressed in the lungs of both mouse strains. Two hundred and six genes were differentially expressed between the two mouse strains, but, remarkably, none of these were up- or down-regulated upon B. pertussis infection. Of these 206 genes, 17 were located in the Bps1 region. Eight of these genes, which showed a strong difference in gene expression between the two mouse strains, map to the immunoglobulin heavy chain complex (Igh). CONCLUSION: Gene expression changes upon B. pertussis infection are highly identical between the two mouse strains despite the differences in the course of B. pertussis infection. Because the genes that were differentially regulated between the mouse strains only showed differences in expression before infection, it appears likely that such intrinsic differences in gene regulation are involved in determining differences in susceptibility to B. pertussis infection. Alternatively, such genetic differences in susceptibility may be explained by genes that are not differentially regulated between these two mouse strains. Genes in the Igh complex, among which Igh-1a/b, are likely candidates to explain differences in susceptibility to B. pertussis. Thus, by microarray analysis we significantly reduced the number of candidate susceptibility genes within the Bps1 locus. Further work should establish the role of the Igh complex in B. pertussis infection.
format Text
id pubmed-2174938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21749382008-01-05 Comparative gene expression profiling in two congenic mouse strains following Bordetella pertussis infection Banus, Sander Vandebriel, Rob J Pennings, Jeroen LA Gremmer, Eric R Wester, Piet W van Kranen, Henk J Breit, Timo M Demant, Peter Mooi, Frits R Hoebee, Barbara Kimman, Tjeerd G BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Susceptibility to Bordetella pertussis infection varies widely. These differences can partly be explained by genetic host factors. HcB-28 mice are more resistant to B. pertussis infection than C3H mice, which could partially be ascribed to the B. pertussis susceptibility locus-1 (Bps1) on chromosome 12. The presence of C57BL/10 genome on this locus instead of C3H genome resulted in a decreased number of bacteria in the lung. To further elucidate the role of host genetic factors, in particular in the Bps1 locus, in B. pertussis infection, and to identify candidate genes within in this region, we compared expression profiles in the lungs of the C3H and HcB-28 mouse strains following B. pertussis inoculation. Twelve and a half percent of the genomes of these mice are from a different genetic background. RESULTS: Upon B. pertussis inoculation 2,353 genes were differentially expressed in the lungs of both mouse strains. Two hundred and six genes were differentially expressed between the two mouse strains, but, remarkably, none of these were up- or down-regulated upon B. pertussis infection. Of these 206 genes, 17 were located in the Bps1 region. Eight of these genes, which showed a strong difference in gene expression between the two mouse strains, map to the immunoglobulin heavy chain complex (Igh). CONCLUSION: Gene expression changes upon B. pertussis infection are highly identical between the two mouse strains despite the differences in the course of B. pertussis infection. Because the genes that were differentially regulated between the mouse strains only showed differences in expression before infection, it appears likely that such intrinsic differences in gene regulation are involved in determining differences in susceptibility to B. pertussis infection. Alternatively, such genetic differences in susceptibility may be explained by genes that are not differentially regulated between these two mouse strains. Genes in the Igh complex, among which Igh-1a/b, are likely candidates to explain differences in susceptibility to B. pertussis. Thus, by microarray analysis we significantly reduced the number of candidate susceptibility genes within the Bps1 locus. Further work should establish the role of the Igh complex in B. pertussis infection. BioMed Central 2007-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2174938/ /pubmed/17935610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-88 Text en Copyright © 2007 Banus et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Banus, Sander
Vandebriel, Rob J
Pennings, Jeroen LA
Gremmer, Eric R
Wester, Piet W
van Kranen, Henk J
Breit, Timo M
Demant, Peter
Mooi, Frits R
Hoebee, Barbara
Kimman, Tjeerd G
Comparative gene expression profiling in two congenic mouse strains following Bordetella pertussis infection
title Comparative gene expression profiling in two congenic mouse strains following Bordetella pertussis infection
title_full Comparative gene expression profiling in two congenic mouse strains following Bordetella pertussis infection
title_fullStr Comparative gene expression profiling in two congenic mouse strains following Bordetella pertussis infection
title_full_unstemmed Comparative gene expression profiling in two congenic mouse strains following Bordetella pertussis infection
title_short Comparative gene expression profiling in two congenic mouse strains following Bordetella pertussis infection
title_sort comparative gene expression profiling in two congenic mouse strains following bordetella pertussis infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2174938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17935610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-88
work_keys_str_mv AT banussander comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection
AT vandebrielrobj comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection
AT penningsjeroenla comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection
AT gremmerericr comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection
AT westerpietw comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection
AT vankranenhenkj comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection
AT breittimom comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection
AT demantpeter comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection
AT mooifritsr comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection
AT hoebeebarbara comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection
AT kimmantjeerdg comparativegeneexpressionprofilingintwocongenicmousestrainsfollowingbordetellapertussisinfection