Cargando…

A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire

BACKGROUND: There is no validated gold-standard diagnostic support tool for LSS, and therefore an accurate diagnosis depends on clinical assessment. Assessment of the diagnostic value of the history of the patient requires an evaluation of the differences and overlap of symptoms of the radicular and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konno, Shin-ichi, Kikuchi, Shin-ichi, Tanaka, Yasuhisa, Yamazaki, Ken, Shimada, You-ichi, Takei, Hiroshi, Yokoyama, Toru, Okada, Masahiro, Kokubun, Shou-ichi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2176057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17967201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-102
_version_ 1782145481516777472
author Konno, Shin-ichi
Kikuchi, Shin-ichi
Tanaka, Yasuhisa
Yamazaki, Ken
Shimada, You-ichi
Takei, Hiroshi
Yokoyama, Toru
Okada, Masahiro
Kokubun, Shou-ichi
author_facet Konno, Shin-ichi
Kikuchi, Shin-ichi
Tanaka, Yasuhisa
Yamazaki, Ken
Shimada, You-ichi
Takei, Hiroshi
Yokoyama, Toru
Okada, Masahiro
Kokubun, Shou-ichi
author_sort Konno, Shin-ichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no validated gold-standard diagnostic support tool for LSS, and therefore an accurate diagnosis depends on clinical assessment. Assessment of the diagnostic value of the history of the patient requires an evaluation of the differences and overlap of symptoms of the radicular and cauda equina types; however, no tool is available for evaluation of the LSS category. We attempted to develop a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire as a diagnostic support tool for LSS using a clinical epidemiological approach. The aim of the present study was to use this tool to assess the diagnostic value of the history of the patient for categorization of LSS. METHODS: The initial derivation study included 137 patients with LSS and 97 with lumbar disc herniation who successfully recovered following surgical treatment. The LSS patients were categorized into radicular and cauda equina types based on history, physical examinations, and MRI. Predictive factors for overlapping symptoms between the two types and for cauda equina symptoms in LSS were derived by univariate analysis. A self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire (SSHQ) was developed based on these findings. A prospective derivation study was then performed in a series of 115 patients with LSS who completed the SSHQ before surgery. All these patients recovered following surgical treatment. The sensitivity of the SSHQ was calculated and clinical prediction rules for LSS were developed. A validation study was subsequently performed on 250 outpatients who complained of lower back pain with or without leg symptoms. The sensitivity and specificity of the SSHQ were calculated, and the test-retest reliability over two weeks was investigated in 217 patients whose symptoms remained unchanged. RESULTS: The key predictive factors for overlapping symptoms between the two categories of LSS were age > 50, lower-extremity pain or numbness, increased pain when walking, increased pain when standing, and relief of symptoms on bending forward (odds ratio ≥ 2, p < 0.05). The key predictive factors for cauda equina type symptoms were numbness around the buttocks, walking almost causes urination, a burning sensation around the buttocks, numbness in the soles of both feet, numbness in both legs, and numbness without pain (odds ratio ≥ 2, p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of the SSHQ were 84% and 78%, respectively, in the validation data set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.797 in the derivation set and 0.782 in the validation data set. In the test-retest analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the first and second tests was 85%. CONCLUSION: A new self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire was developed successfully as a diagnostic support tool for LSS.
format Text
id pubmed-2176057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21760572008-01-09 A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire Konno, Shin-ichi Kikuchi, Shin-ichi Tanaka, Yasuhisa Yamazaki, Ken Shimada, You-ichi Takei, Hiroshi Yokoyama, Toru Okada, Masahiro Kokubun, Shou-ichi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: There is no validated gold-standard diagnostic support tool for LSS, and therefore an accurate diagnosis depends on clinical assessment. Assessment of the diagnostic value of the history of the patient requires an evaluation of the differences and overlap of symptoms of the radicular and cauda equina types; however, no tool is available for evaluation of the LSS category. We attempted to develop a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire as a diagnostic support tool for LSS using a clinical epidemiological approach. The aim of the present study was to use this tool to assess the diagnostic value of the history of the patient for categorization of LSS. METHODS: The initial derivation study included 137 patients with LSS and 97 with lumbar disc herniation who successfully recovered following surgical treatment. The LSS patients were categorized into radicular and cauda equina types based on history, physical examinations, and MRI. Predictive factors for overlapping symptoms between the two types and for cauda equina symptoms in LSS were derived by univariate analysis. A self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire (SSHQ) was developed based on these findings. A prospective derivation study was then performed in a series of 115 patients with LSS who completed the SSHQ before surgery. All these patients recovered following surgical treatment. The sensitivity of the SSHQ was calculated and clinical prediction rules for LSS were developed. A validation study was subsequently performed on 250 outpatients who complained of lower back pain with or without leg symptoms. The sensitivity and specificity of the SSHQ were calculated, and the test-retest reliability over two weeks was investigated in 217 patients whose symptoms remained unchanged. RESULTS: The key predictive factors for overlapping symptoms between the two categories of LSS were age > 50, lower-extremity pain or numbness, increased pain when walking, increased pain when standing, and relief of symptoms on bending forward (odds ratio ≥ 2, p < 0.05). The key predictive factors for cauda equina type symptoms were numbness around the buttocks, walking almost causes urination, a burning sensation around the buttocks, numbness in the soles of both feet, numbness in both legs, and numbness without pain (odds ratio ≥ 2, p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of the SSHQ were 84% and 78%, respectively, in the validation data set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.797 in the derivation set and 0.782 in the validation data set. In the test-retest analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the first and second tests was 85%. CONCLUSION: A new self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire was developed successfully as a diagnostic support tool for LSS. BioMed Central 2007-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2176057/ /pubmed/17967201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-102 Text en Copyright © 2007 Konno et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Konno, Shin-ichi
Kikuchi, Shin-ichi
Tanaka, Yasuhisa
Yamazaki, Ken
Shimada, You-ichi
Takei, Hiroshi
Yokoyama, Toru
Okada, Masahiro
Kokubun, Shou-ichi
A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire
title A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire
title_full A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire
title_fullStr A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire
title_short A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire
title_sort diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2176057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17967201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-102
work_keys_str_mv AT konnoshinichi adiagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT kikuchishinichi adiagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT tanakayasuhisa adiagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT yamazakiken adiagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT shimadayouichi adiagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT takeihiroshi adiagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT yokoyamatoru adiagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT okadamasahiro adiagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT kokubunshouichi adiagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT konnoshinichi diagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT kikuchishinichi diagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT tanakayasuhisa diagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT yamazakiken diagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT shimadayouichi diagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT takeihiroshi diagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT yokoyamatoru diagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT okadamasahiro diagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire
AT kokubunshouichi diagnosticsupporttoolforlumbarspinalstenosisaselfadministeredselfreportedhistoryquestionnaire