Cargando…

A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research

BACKGROUND: Placebo needles that can mask acupuncture practitioners to the type of needle used have been considered almost impossible to develop until now. METHODS: We designed a double-blind non-penetrating placebo needle, the needle tip of which simply presses against the skin, and a matched penet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takakura, Nobuari, Yajima, Hiroyoshi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2176062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17925042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-7-31
_version_ 1782145482676502528
author Takakura, Nobuari
Yajima, Hiroyoshi
author_facet Takakura, Nobuari
Yajima, Hiroyoshi
author_sort Takakura, Nobuari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Placebo needles that can mask acupuncture practitioners to the type of needle used have been considered almost impossible to develop until now. METHODS: We designed a double-blind non-penetrating placebo needle, the needle tip of which simply presses against the skin, and a matched penetrating needle. The needles are encased inside an opaque guide tube and the appearance and feel of the pair are designed to be indistinguishable. To validate the masking effect for the practitioner, 10 acupuncturists each applied 23 non-penetrating needles and 17 penetrating needles to the Large Intestine-4 point. After removing each needle, they judged whether the needle was 'penetrating', 'non-penetrating' or 'unidentifiable'. For the validation of patient masking, an acupuncturist randomly applied a non-penetrating/penetrating needle pair to the bilateral Sanjiao-5 points in 60 volunteers. When both applications were completed, we asked them to write down anything that they noticed regarding the needle application and associated sensations. RESULTS: The mean ± SD of correct/unidentifiable/incorrect answers given by the 10 acupuncturists were 17.0 ± 4.1/6.4 ± 3.6/16.6 ± 3.0, respectively. Regarding patient masking, none of the subjects commented in the questionnaire that they had received a non-penetrating needle. Of 60 penetrating and 60 non-penetrating needle applications, 48 (80.0%) and 25 (41.7%) applications elicited skin penetration sensation and 48 (80.0%) and 20 (33.3%) applications elicited de qi, respectively. CONCLUSION: These needles have the potential to mask both practitioners and patients from the type of needle used in acupuncture research.
format Text
id pubmed-2176062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21760622008-01-09 A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research Takakura, Nobuari Yajima, Hiroyoshi BMC Complement Altern Med Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Placebo needles that can mask acupuncture practitioners to the type of needle used have been considered almost impossible to develop until now. METHODS: We designed a double-blind non-penetrating placebo needle, the needle tip of which simply presses against the skin, and a matched penetrating needle. The needles are encased inside an opaque guide tube and the appearance and feel of the pair are designed to be indistinguishable. To validate the masking effect for the practitioner, 10 acupuncturists each applied 23 non-penetrating needles and 17 penetrating needles to the Large Intestine-4 point. After removing each needle, they judged whether the needle was 'penetrating', 'non-penetrating' or 'unidentifiable'. For the validation of patient masking, an acupuncturist randomly applied a non-penetrating/penetrating needle pair to the bilateral Sanjiao-5 points in 60 volunteers. When both applications were completed, we asked them to write down anything that they noticed regarding the needle application and associated sensations. RESULTS: The mean ± SD of correct/unidentifiable/incorrect answers given by the 10 acupuncturists were 17.0 ± 4.1/6.4 ± 3.6/16.6 ± 3.0, respectively. Regarding patient masking, none of the subjects commented in the questionnaire that they had received a non-penetrating needle. Of 60 penetrating and 60 non-penetrating needle applications, 48 (80.0%) and 25 (41.7%) applications elicited skin penetration sensation and 48 (80.0%) and 20 (33.3%) applications elicited de qi, respectively. CONCLUSION: These needles have the potential to mask both practitioners and patients from the type of needle used in acupuncture research. BioMed Central 2007-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2176062/ /pubmed/17925042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-7-31 Text en Copyright © 2007 Takakura and Yajima; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Takakura, Nobuari
Yajima, Hiroyoshi
A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research
title A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research
title_full A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research
title_fullStr A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research
title_full_unstemmed A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research
title_short A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research
title_sort double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2176062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17925042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-7-31
work_keys_str_mv AT takakuranobuari adoubleblindplaceboneedleforacupunctureresearch
AT yajimahiroyoshi adoubleblindplaceboneedleforacupunctureresearch
AT takakuranobuari doubleblindplaceboneedleforacupunctureresearch
AT yajimahiroyoshi doubleblindplaceboneedleforacupunctureresearch