Cargando…

The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging

In April 2007, the American College of Radiology released the "White Paper on Radiation Dose in Medicine". The Blue Ribbon panel members included private practice and academic diagnostic radiologists, medical physicists, representatives of industry and regulatory groups, and a patient advo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Picano, Eugenio, Vano, Eliseo, Semelka, Richard, Regulla, Dieter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17974025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-5-37
_version_ 1782145912571691008
author Picano, Eugenio
Vano, Eliseo
Semelka, Richard
Regulla, Dieter
author_facet Picano, Eugenio
Vano, Eliseo
Semelka, Richard
Regulla, Dieter
author_sort Picano, Eugenio
collection PubMed
description In April 2007, the American College of Radiology released the "White Paper on Radiation Dose in Medicine". The Blue Ribbon panel members included private practice and academic diagnostic radiologists, medical physicists, representatives of industry and regulatory groups, and a patient advocate. The panel concluded that the expanding use of imaging modalities using ionizing radiations such as CT and nuclear medicine may result in an increased incidence of radiation-related cancer in the exposed population in the not-too-distant future, and this problem can likely be minimized by preventing the inappropriate use of such imaging and by optimizing studies that are performed to obtain the best image quality with the lowest radiation dose. The White Paper set forth practical suggestions to minimize radiation risk, including education for all stakeholders in the principles of radiation safety and preferential use of alternative (non-ionizing) imaging techniques, such as MRI and ultrasound. These recommendations are especially relevant for cardiologists, who prescribe and/or practice medical imaging examinations accounting for at least 50% of the total effective dose by radiation medicine, which amounts to an equivalent of about 160 chest x-rays per head per year in US. Were they be enacted, these simple recommendations would determine a revolution in the contemporary way of teaching, learning and practising cardiology.
format Text
id pubmed-2186301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21863012008-01-10 The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging Picano, Eugenio Vano, Eliseo Semelka, Richard Regulla, Dieter Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research In April 2007, the American College of Radiology released the "White Paper on Radiation Dose in Medicine". The Blue Ribbon panel members included private practice and academic diagnostic radiologists, medical physicists, representatives of industry and regulatory groups, and a patient advocate. The panel concluded that the expanding use of imaging modalities using ionizing radiations such as CT and nuclear medicine may result in an increased incidence of radiation-related cancer in the exposed population in the not-too-distant future, and this problem can likely be minimized by preventing the inappropriate use of such imaging and by optimizing studies that are performed to obtain the best image quality with the lowest radiation dose. The White Paper set forth practical suggestions to minimize radiation risk, including education for all stakeholders in the principles of radiation safety and preferential use of alternative (non-ionizing) imaging techniques, such as MRI and ultrasound. These recommendations are especially relevant for cardiologists, who prescribe and/or practice medical imaging examinations accounting for at least 50% of the total effective dose by radiation medicine, which amounts to an equivalent of about 160 chest x-rays per head per year in US. Were they be enacted, these simple recommendations would determine a revolution in the contemporary way of teaching, learning and practising cardiology. BioMed Central 2007-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2186301/ /pubmed/17974025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-5-37 Text en Copyright © 2007 Picano et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Picano, Eugenio
Vano, Eliseo
Semelka, Richard
Regulla, Dieter
The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging
title The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging
title_full The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging
title_fullStr The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging
title_full_unstemmed The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging
title_short The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging
title_sort american college of radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17974025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-5-37
work_keys_str_mv AT picanoeugenio theamericancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging
AT vanoeliseo theamericancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging
AT semelkarichard theamericancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging
AT regulladieter theamericancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging
AT picanoeugenio americancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging
AT vanoeliseo americancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging
AT semelkarichard americancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging
AT regulladieter americancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging