Cargando…
The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging
In April 2007, the American College of Radiology released the "White Paper on Radiation Dose in Medicine". The Blue Ribbon panel members included private practice and academic diagnostic radiologists, medical physicists, representatives of industry and regulatory groups, and a patient advo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17974025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-5-37 |
_version_ | 1782145912571691008 |
---|---|
author | Picano, Eugenio Vano, Eliseo Semelka, Richard Regulla, Dieter |
author_facet | Picano, Eugenio Vano, Eliseo Semelka, Richard Regulla, Dieter |
author_sort | Picano, Eugenio |
collection | PubMed |
description | In April 2007, the American College of Radiology released the "White Paper on Radiation Dose in Medicine". The Blue Ribbon panel members included private practice and academic diagnostic radiologists, medical physicists, representatives of industry and regulatory groups, and a patient advocate. The panel concluded that the expanding use of imaging modalities using ionizing radiations such as CT and nuclear medicine may result in an increased incidence of radiation-related cancer in the exposed population in the not-too-distant future, and this problem can likely be minimized by preventing the inappropriate use of such imaging and by optimizing studies that are performed to obtain the best image quality with the lowest radiation dose. The White Paper set forth practical suggestions to minimize radiation risk, including education for all stakeholders in the principles of radiation safety and preferential use of alternative (non-ionizing) imaging techniques, such as MRI and ultrasound. These recommendations are especially relevant for cardiologists, who prescribe and/or practice medical imaging examinations accounting for at least 50% of the total effective dose by radiation medicine, which amounts to an equivalent of about 160 chest x-rays per head per year in US. Were they be enacted, these simple recommendations would determine a revolution in the contemporary way of teaching, learning and practising cardiology. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2186301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21863012008-01-10 The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging Picano, Eugenio Vano, Eliseo Semelka, Richard Regulla, Dieter Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research In April 2007, the American College of Radiology released the "White Paper on Radiation Dose in Medicine". The Blue Ribbon panel members included private practice and academic diagnostic radiologists, medical physicists, representatives of industry and regulatory groups, and a patient advocate. The panel concluded that the expanding use of imaging modalities using ionizing radiations such as CT and nuclear medicine may result in an increased incidence of radiation-related cancer in the exposed population in the not-too-distant future, and this problem can likely be minimized by preventing the inappropriate use of such imaging and by optimizing studies that are performed to obtain the best image quality with the lowest radiation dose. The White Paper set forth practical suggestions to minimize radiation risk, including education for all stakeholders in the principles of radiation safety and preferential use of alternative (non-ionizing) imaging techniques, such as MRI and ultrasound. These recommendations are especially relevant for cardiologists, who prescribe and/or practice medical imaging examinations accounting for at least 50% of the total effective dose by radiation medicine, which amounts to an equivalent of about 160 chest x-rays per head per year in US. Were they be enacted, these simple recommendations would determine a revolution in the contemporary way of teaching, learning and practising cardiology. BioMed Central 2007-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2186301/ /pubmed/17974025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-5-37 Text en Copyright © 2007 Picano et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Picano, Eugenio Vano, Eliseo Semelka, Richard Regulla, Dieter The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging |
title | The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging |
title_full | The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging |
title_fullStr | The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging |
title_short | The American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging |
title_sort | american college of radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine:deep impact on the practice of cardiovascular imaging |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17974025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-5-37 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT picanoeugenio theamericancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging AT vanoeliseo theamericancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging AT semelkarichard theamericancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging AT regulladieter theamericancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging AT picanoeugenio americancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging AT vanoeliseo americancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging AT semelkarichard americancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging AT regulladieter americancollegeofradiologywhitepaperonradiationdoseinmedicinedeepimpactonthepracticeofcardiovascularimaging |