Cargando…

Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language

BACKGROUND: Recently several studies have shown that people use contextual information to make predictions about the rest of the sentence or story as the text unfolds. Using event related potentials (ERPs) we tested whether these on-line predictions are based on a message-level representation of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otten, Marte, Nieuwland, Mante S, Van Berkum, Jos JA
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17963486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-89
_version_ 1782145922204958720
author Otten, Marte
Nieuwland, Mante S
Van Berkum, Jos JA
author_facet Otten, Marte
Nieuwland, Mante S
Van Berkum, Jos JA
author_sort Otten, Marte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently several studies have shown that people use contextual information to make predictions about the rest of the sentence or story as the text unfolds. Using event related potentials (ERPs) we tested whether these on-line predictions are based on a message-level representation of the discourse or on simple automatic activation by individual words. Subjects heard short stories that were highly constraining for one specific noun, or stories that were not specifically predictive but contained the same prime words as the predictive stories. To test whether listeners make specific predictions critical nouns were preceded by an adjective that was inflected according to, or in contrast with, the gender of the expected noun. RESULTS: When the message of the preceding discourse was predictive, adjectives with an unexpected gender inflection evoked a negative deflection over right-frontal electrodes between 300 and 600 ms. This effect was not present in the prime control context, indicating that the prediction mismatch does not hinge on word-based priming but is based on the actual message of the discourse. CONCLUSION: When listening to a constraining discourse people rapidly make very specific predictions about the remainder of the story, as the story unfolds. These predictions are not simply based on word-based automatic activation, but take into account the actual message of the discourse.
format Text
id pubmed-2186342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21863422008-01-10 Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language Otten, Marte Nieuwland, Mante S Van Berkum, Jos JA BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Recently several studies have shown that people use contextual information to make predictions about the rest of the sentence or story as the text unfolds. Using event related potentials (ERPs) we tested whether these on-line predictions are based on a message-level representation of the discourse or on simple automatic activation by individual words. Subjects heard short stories that were highly constraining for one specific noun, or stories that were not specifically predictive but contained the same prime words as the predictive stories. To test whether listeners make specific predictions critical nouns were preceded by an adjective that was inflected according to, or in contrast with, the gender of the expected noun. RESULTS: When the message of the preceding discourse was predictive, adjectives with an unexpected gender inflection evoked a negative deflection over right-frontal electrodes between 300 and 600 ms. This effect was not present in the prime control context, indicating that the prediction mismatch does not hinge on word-based priming but is based on the actual message of the discourse. CONCLUSION: When listening to a constraining discourse people rapidly make very specific predictions about the remainder of the story, as the story unfolds. These predictions are not simply based on word-based automatic activation, but take into account the actual message of the discourse. BioMed Central 2007-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2186342/ /pubmed/17963486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-89 Text en Copyright © 2007 Otten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Otten, Marte
Nieuwland, Mante S
Van Berkum, Jos JA
Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language
title Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language
title_full Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language
title_fullStr Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language
title_full_unstemmed Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language
title_short Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language
title_sort great expectations: specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17963486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-89
work_keys_str_mv AT ottenmarte greatexpectationsspecificlexicalanticipationinfluencestheprocessingofspokenlanguage
AT nieuwlandmantes greatexpectationsspecificlexicalanticipationinfluencestheprocessingofspokenlanguage
AT vanberkumjosja greatexpectationsspecificlexicalanticipationinfluencestheprocessingofspokenlanguage