Cargando…
Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language
BACKGROUND: Recently several studies have shown that people use contextual information to make predictions about the rest of the sentence or story as the text unfolds. Using event related potentials (ERPs) we tested whether these on-line predictions are based on a message-level representation of the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17963486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-89 |
_version_ | 1782145922204958720 |
---|---|
author | Otten, Marte Nieuwland, Mante S Van Berkum, Jos JA |
author_facet | Otten, Marte Nieuwland, Mante S Van Berkum, Jos JA |
author_sort | Otten, Marte |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently several studies have shown that people use contextual information to make predictions about the rest of the sentence or story as the text unfolds. Using event related potentials (ERPs) we tested whether these on-line predictions are based on a message-level representation of the discourse or on simple automatic activation by individual words. Subjects heard short stories that were highly constraining for one specific noun, or stories that were not specifically predictive but contained the same prime words as the predictive stories. To test whether listeners make specific predictions critical nouns were preceded by an adjective that was inflected according to, or in contrast with, the gender of the expected noun. RESULTS: When the message of the preceding discourse was predictive, adjectives with an unexpected gender inflection evoked a negative deflection over right-frontal electrodes between 300 and 600 ms. This effect was not present in the prime control context, indicating that the prediction mismatch does not hinge on word-based priming but is based on the actual message of the discourse. CONCLUSION: When listening to a constraining discourse people rapidly make very specific predictions about the remainder of the story, as the story unfolds. These predictions are not simply based on word-based automatic activation, but take into account the actual message of the discourse. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2186342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21863422008-01-10 Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language Otten, Marte Nieuwland, Mante S Van Berkum, Jos JA BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Recently several studies have shown that people use contextual information to make predictions about the rest of the sentence or story as the text unfolds. Using event related potentials (ERPs) we tested whether these on-line predictions are based on a message-level representation of the discourse or on simple automatic activation by individual words. Subjects heard short stories that were highly constraining for one specific noun, or stories that were not specifically predictive but contained the same prime words as the predictive stories. To test whether listeners make specific predictions critical nouns were preceded by an adjective that was inflected according to, or in contrast with, the gender of the expected noun. RESULTS: When the message of the preceding discourse was predictive, adjectives with an unexpected gender inflection evoked a negative deflection over right-frontal electrodes between 300 and 600 ms. This effect was not present in the prime control context, indicating that the prediction mismatch does not hinge on word-based priming but is based on the actual message of the discourse. CONCLUSION: When listening to a constraining discourse people rapidly make very specific predictions about the remainder of the story, as the story unfolds. These predictions are not simply based on word-based automatic activation, but take into account the actual message of the discourse. BioMed Central 2007-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2186342/ /pubmed/17963486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-89 Text en Copyright © 2007 Otten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Otten, Marte Nieuwland, Mante S Van Berkum, Jos JA Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language |
title | Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language |
title_full | Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language |
title_fullStr | Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language |
title_full_unstemmed | Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language |
title_short | Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language |
title_sort | great expectations: specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17963486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-89 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ottenmarte greatexpectationsspecificlexicalanticipationinfluencestheprocessingofspokenlanguage AT nieuwlandmantes greatexpectationsspecificlexicalanticipationinfluencestheprocessingofspokenlanguage AT vanberkumjosja greatexpectationsspecificlexicalanticipationinfluencestheprocessingofspokenlanguage |