Cargando…
Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer
We have examined the ontogeny of BALB/c plaque-forming cell (PFC) responses to phosphorylcholine (PC) from fetal and neonatal liver by using the (CBA/N x BALB/c)F1 transplantation model. In this system, thymus-dependent (PC-keyhole limpet hemocyanin) and thymus-independent class 1 (PC-Brucella abort...
Formato: | Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
1981
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6975348 |
_version_ | 1782145958415433728 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | We have examined the ontogeny of BALB/c plaque-forming cell (PFC) responses to phosphorylcholine (PC) from fetal and neonatal liver by using the (CBA/N x BALB/c)F1 transplantation model. In this system, thymus-dependent (PC-keyhole limpet hemocyanin) and thymus-independent class 1 (PC-Brucella abortus, PC-lipopolysaccharide) PC antigens stimulate B cell subpopulations, which functionally emerge early after transfer. Responsiveness to a thymus-independent class 2 antigen, C- polysaccharide extract of a Streptococcus pneumoniae mutant, is acquired later. The response to PC antigens tested initially exhibited T15 dominance. Non-T15 clones, which are not expressed to a great degree in normal BALB/c mice, are inherently slow in their rate of maturation; in adoptive transfer, however, they eventually comprise much of the transplanted anti-PC PFC response. Obviously, the advantages the T15 subset has in ontogeny do not result in idiotypic dominance once the immature cells are removed from the intact BALB/c environment. We discuss possible regulatory mechanisms involved in the alteration of the T15+:T15- ratio. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2186510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1981 |
publisher | The Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-21865102008-04-17 Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer J Exp Med Articles We have examined the ontogeny of BALB/c plaque-forming cell (PFC) responses to phosphorylcholine (PC) from fetal and neonatal liver by using the (CBA/N x BALB/c)F1 transplantation model. In this system, thymus-dependent (PC-keyhole limpet hemocyanin) and thymus-independent class 1 (PC-Brucella abortus, PC-lipopolysaccharide) PC antigens stimulate B cell subpopulations, which functionally emerge early after transfer. Responsiveness to a thymus-independent class 2 antigen, C- polysaccharide extract of a Streptococcus pneumoniae mutant, is acquired later. The response to PC antigens tested initially exhibited T15 dominance. Non-T15 clones, which are not expressed to a great degree in normal BALB/c mice, are inherently slow in their rate of maturation; in adoptive transfer, however, they eventually comprise much of the transplanted anti-PC PFC response. Obviously, the advantages the T15 subset has in ontogeny do not result in idiotypic dominance once the immature cells are removed from the intact BALB/c environment. We discuss possible regulatory mechanisms involved in the alteration of the T15+:T15- ratio. The Rockefeller University Press 1981-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2186510/ /pubmed/6975348 Text en This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer |
title | Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer |
title_full | Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer |
title_fullStr | Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer |
title_full_unstemmed | Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer |
title_short | Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer |
title_sort | alteration of clonal profile. iii. t15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6975348 |