Cargando…

Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer

We have examined the ontogeny of BALB/c plaque-forming cell (PFC) responses to phosphorylcholine (PC) from fetal and neonatal liver by using the (CBA/N x BALB/c)F1 transplantation model. In this system, thymus-dependent (PC-keyhole limpet hemocyanin) and thymus-independent class 1 (PC-Brucella abort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1981
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6975348
_version_ 1782145958415433728
collection PubMed
description We have examined the ontogeny of BALB/c plaque-forming cell (PFC) responses to phosphorylcholine (PC) from fetal and neonatal liver by using the (CBA/N x BALB/c)F1 transplantation model. In this system, thymus-dependent (PC-keyhole limpet hemocyanin) and thymus-independent class 1 (PC-Brucella abortus, PC-lipopolysaccharide) PC antigens stimulate B cell subpopulations, which functionally emerge early after transfer. Responsiveness to a thymus-independent class 2 antigen, C- polysaccharide extract of a Streptococcus pneumoniae mutant, is acquired later. The response to PC antigens tested initially exhibited T15 dominance. Non-T15 clones, which are not expressed to a great degree in normal BALB/c mice, are inherently slow in their rate of maturation; in adoptive transfer, however, they eventually comprise much of the transplanted anti-PC PFC response. Obviously, the advantages the T15 subset has in ontogeny do not result in idiotypic dominance once the immature cells are removed from the intact BALB/c environment. We discuss possible regulatory mechanisms involved in the alteration of the T15+:T15- ratio.
format Text
id pubmed-2186510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1981
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21865102008-04-17 Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer J Exp Med Articles We have examined the ontogeny of BALB/c plaque-forming cell (PFC) responses to phosphorylcholine (PC) from fetal and neonatal liver by using the (CBA/N x BALB/c)F1 transplantation model. In this system, thymus-dependent (PC-keyhole limpet hemocyanin) and thymus-independent class 1 (PC-Brucella abortus, PC-lipopolysaccharide) PC antigens stimulate B cell subpopulations, which functionally emerge early after transfer. Responsiveness to a thymus-independent class 2 antigen, C- polysaccharide extract of a Streptococcus pneumoniae mutant, is acquired later. The response to PC antigens tested initially exhibited T15 dominance. Non-T15 clones, which are not expressed to a great degree in normal BALB/c mice, are inherently slow in their rate of maturation; in adoptive transfer, however, they eventually comprise much of the transplanted anti-PC PFC response. Obviously, the advantages the T15 subset has in ontogeny do not result in idiotypic dominance once the immature cells are removed from the intact BALB/c environment. We discuss possible regulatory mechanisms involved in the alteration of the T15+:T15- ratio. The Rockefeller University Press 1981-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2186510/ /pubmed/6975348 Text en This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer
title Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer
title_full Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer
title_fullStr Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer
title_full_unstemmed Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer
title_short Alteration of clonal profile. III. T15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer
title_sort alteration of clonal profile. iii. t15 ontogenetic advantages are not sufficient for establishing idiotypic dominance in adoptive transfer
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6975348