Cargando…

Abrogation by subsequent feeding of antibody response including IgE, in parenterally immunized mice

We have investigated the possibility of oral administration of ovalbumin (OVA) to prevent a secondary antibody response and interrupt reaginic antibody production. Repeated feeding seems necessary for both. Quality of results was dependent on the number of ingestions. Differences in abrogation of an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 1982
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7069374
_version_ 1782145997099499520
collection PubMed
description We have investigated the possibility of oral administration of ovalbumin (OVA) to prevent a secondary antibody response and interrupt reaginic antibody production. Repeated feeding seems necessary for both. Quality of results was dependent on the number of ingestions. Differences in abrogation of antibody response between mice strains were observed. Best results were obtained with AKR mice, good suppression was seen in C3H strain, and inconsistent results were obtained with DBA/2. 10 OVA oral doses were necessary to prevent a secondary antibody response in parenterally immunized mice, but 4 doses interrupted reaginic production in sensitized AKR mice. These results demonstrate that antigen feeding can prevent a secondary antibody response and interrupt reaginic antibody production.
format Text
id pubmed-2186674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1982
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-21866742008-04-17 Abrogation by subsequent feeding of antibody response including IgE, in parenterally immunized mice J Exp Med Articles We have investigated the possibility of oral administration of ovalbumin (OVA) to prevent a secondary antibody response and interrupt reaginic antibody production. Repeated feeding seems necessary for both. Quality of results was dependent on the number of ingestions. Differences in abrogation of antibody response between mice strains were observed. Best results were obtained with AKR mice, good suppression was seen in C3H strain, and inconsistent results were obtained with DBA/2. 10 OVA oral doses were necessary to prevent a secondary antibody response in parenterally immunized mice, but 4 doses interrupted reaginic production in sensitized AKR mice. These results demonstrate that antigen feeding can prevent a secondary antibody response and interrupt reaginic antibody production. The Rockefeller University Press 1982-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2186674/ /pubmed/7069374 Text en This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Abrogation by subsequent feeding of antibody response including IgE, in parenterally immunized mice
title Abrogation by subsequent feeding of antibody response including IgE, in parenterally immunized mice
title_full Abrogation by subsequent feeding of antibody response including IgE, in parenterally immunized mice
title_fullStr Abrogation by subsequent feeding of antibody response including IgE, in parenterally immunized mice
title_full_unstemmed Abrogation by subsequent feeding of antibody response including IgE, in parenterally immunized mice
title_short Abrogation by subsequent feeding of antibody response including IgE, in parenterally immunized mice
title_sort abrogation by subsequent feeding of antibody response including ige, in parenterally immunized mice
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2186674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7069374